1 / 11

Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality:

Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality:. how augmented Kuznets hypothesis could explain ICT diffusion?. Miguel Torres Preto. 30 May 2005. Motivation: Technology and Inequality.

jeb
Download Presentation

Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality: how augmented Kuznets hypothesis could explain ICT diffusion? Miguel Torres Preto 30 May 2005

  2. Motivation: Technology and Inequality • This study aims at making a contribution towards widening the understanding of the relationships between income inequality and technology diffusion • Previous research traditionally conceptualized as a one-way relationship and from the production side: new technologies contribute to increase economic inequality • (Schmitt 1995, Krussell 1997, Bound and Johnson 1992, Card and Lemieux 2000, Acemoglu and Pisckhe 2000, Vindigni 2002) • Recent increase in economic inequality in most advanced countries has been attributed to the diffusion of ICTs, raising the skill premium for computer literates • (Acemoglu 2002) • The issue of how inequality influences the adoption of technology is seldom studied and there is a clear lack of models and empirical studies to illustrate it • Exceptions include a few studies on the “digital divide” issue • (Castells 1998, Hargittai 1999, Norris 2001, Sachs 2002)

  3. Research Hypothesis • Inequality negatively influences the demand conditions for consumption technologies considering ICTs as consumption goods that end-users acquire and use • ICTs • Computers designed to be used by a single individual • People with Internet access to the worldwide network • Users of portable telephones subscribing service providing access to the public switched telephone network • Time period: 1981-2002 • Sample: 25 OECD countries • Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark • Finland France Germany Greece Hungary • Ireland Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg • Netherlands New Zeal. Norway Poland Portugal • Slovakia Spain Sweden UK USA

  4. Kuznets 1955 Models and Methodology Data source: World Bank WDI 2003 • Kuznets Models dif τ – rate of adoption • Diffusion Models dif τ (c,t) = X(c,t).βτ + μτc c – country t – year τ– technology Personal computers Internet users Mobile phones Endogeneity between inequality and income X – explanatory variables inequality income GDP per capita (log) secondary school tertiary school services sector weight foreign direct investment telephone main lines Kuznets Hypothesis I – inequality y – income GDP per capita (log)

  5. Inequality Database • Data Source: STAN (STructural ANalisys) • Sample: 25 OECD countries • Time period: 1981-2002 • Theil index (Conceição and Galbraith 2001) • Wage – labor costs (include supplements) • Labor - number engaged (total employment) • Construction of a database of income inequality consistent over time and comparable across countries N – no. of people in the population yi – income of the ith person ŷ – average income Main outcome: IST-STAN Theil data set

  6. Results: Income and Inequality Specification problem of ICT diffusion model Endogenous relationship between inequality and income Identifying this relationship the endogeneity problem is overcome Inequality as a cubic polynomial of income GDP per capita calculated for 25 OECD countries for 1970-2000 Augmented Augmented Kuznets curve emerges in most of the models Kuznets Hypothesis

  7. Results: ICT Diffusion and Inequality Panel Data Regression Results for PCs Diffusion Model (Fixed Effects) Proxy of Inequality Level of inequality important for ICT diffusion Hypothesis: inequality hinders ICT diffusion is rejected Note: Standard errors are in brackets. Estimates significant below the 1% level are in bold.

  8. Results: ICT Diffusion and Inequality Panel Data Regression Results for PCs Diffusion Model (Fixed Effects) Education is relevant in most of the models (specially for PCs) FDI is a positive determinant of the ICT diffusion Note: Standard errors are in brackets. Estimates significant below the 1% level are in bold.

  9. Conclusions • Empirical evidence of the augmented Kuznets hypothesis • Existence of inequalities does not hinder the diffusion of technologies at least for the countries considered • Our proxy of inequality (cubic polynomial of income GDP) has a positive correlation with the ICT adoption rate coefficients • “New commodities diffuse from the rich to the masses” • (Galbraith 1998) • Relevance of the variables concerning human capital and foreign direct investment as drivers of ICT diffusion

  10. Further Work • Introduction of new independent and controlling variables • Monopoly power • Public/private telecommunications providers • Hedonic model of prices of technologies • Relationships among technologies • Widen sample • Developing countries • Cases studies • Unit of analysis: region

  11. Technology Diffusion and Income Inequality: How augmented Kuznets hypothesis could explain ICT diffusion? Miguel Torres Preto 30 May 2005

More Related