1 / 17

Solar Powered Charging Station: Mid-Term Presentation

Solar Powered Charging Station: Mid-Term Presentation. Sponsors: Conn Center for Renewable Energy Dr. James Graham, PhD Dr. Chris Foreman, PhD. Design Team: Ben Hemp Jahmai Turner Rob Wolf, PE. Revision A, 10/3/11. Background.

jbyers
Download Presentation

Solar Powered Charging Station: Mid-Term Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solar Powered Charging Station:Mid-Term Presentation Sponsors: Conn Center for Renewable Energy Dr. James Graham, PhD Dr. Chris Foreman, PhD Design Team: Ben Hemp Jahmai Turner Rob Wolf, PE Revision A, 10/3/11

  2. Background • The design, fabrication, assembly and integration / testing of a solar powered charging station • Our Tasks: • Size and Specify Panels Supplied By the Conn Center • Research Various Technologies (panel, inverters, etc.) • Work with Sponsors to Select Final Design Criteria

  3. Solar Data for Louisville, KY Source: PVWatts

  4. Electric Vehicle SpecificationsNoGas Vintage Scooter • 50 MPH Top Speed • 50 Mile Range • 72 VDC, 40 Ah Lithium-Ion Batteries with BMS • Regenerative Braking • 340 lb. capacity • Built-in Charger • 110V Charging with 1-8 hr. max charge time • regenerative braking • Front and rear hydraulic disk brakes • Hydraulic shocks front and rear

  5. Charging Requirements • Fundementals AH = Power / Battery Voltage Power = Vehicle Efficiency * Range • Scooter • 72 VDC, 40 Ah Batteries Power = AH * Battery Voltage = 40 Ah * 72 VDC = 2.88 kW Efficiency = Power / Range = 2.88 kW / 50 miles = 57.6 W / mile

  6. Charging Requirements (Cont.) • Assume Driven 20 Miles Per Day: Power = Efficiency * Range = (57.6 W/mile) * (20 miles) = 1152 W AH Required to Charge = Power / Battery Voltage = (1152 W) / (72 V) = 16 Ah • Assume 8 Hour Charging / Day Requires 2Ah to Batteries

  7. Charging Requirements (Cont.) • Requirements Based on Solar Study DC Rating: 500W AC to DC Derate Factor: 77% AC Rating: 385W Solar Hours / Day: 2.96 (December) & 4.71 (Average for Year) December Output 500W System = 385W * 2.96 Hours = 1140 Wh / Day Yearly Average Output 500W System = 385W * 4.71 Hours = 1813 Wh / Day

  8. Charging Station Components • Solar Panels • Inverter • Battery Bank • Charging Station • Remote Monitoring and Control • Data Logging

  9. Solar Panel Technologies • Solar Panels (SP’s) convert photons (light) into DC current. This technology is called photovoltaic (PV). • Maximum efficiencies for most commercial SP’s is around ~20%. • Three major types of PV technology: mono-crystalline, poly-crystalline, and thin-films. These are listed in order from most to least efficient. • To create equivalent power, a lower efficiency SP needs more surface area than a high efficiency SP. • Common output powers for large SP’s are 50-300W per panel. • SP’s may be combined in series to increase voltage, or parallel to increase current.

  10. Solar Panel Technologies Mono-crystalline • Most efficient style (least surface area needed) • Best performance during low light and shading • Usually most expensive $/watt Poly-crystalline • Mid-grade efficiency • Tend to be less expensive than • mono-crystalline for $/watt Thin-Film • Least efficient style • May be the least expensive, or similar to others for $/watt. • Styles capable of roll-up panel mats and artificial shingles.

  11. Solar Panel Technologies *Values determined using Voc and Isc temperature coefficients from manufacturers

  12. Inverters • Centralized versus Distributed • Grid-tied versus Off-grid • Off-grid means batteries required • Grid-tied: Requirements for net-metering • This project would be tied in W.S. Speed Hall building infrastructure (i.e. – solar panels would power building and charging station would be powered by building) • Need instrumentation to compare power into building versus power supplied to charging station

  13. Distributed Inverters / Microinverters

  14. Centralized Inverters

  15. Comparison of Inverter Technologies Microinverters Centralized Inverters DC Voltages Up to 600 V Not Easily Expanded Higher Initial Cost Lowest Output Panel is Weakest Link of System Standard Wiring Methods Typically Requires More Integration for SCADA • Lower DC Voltages (30-50V) • Modular & Expandable • Lower Initial Cost • Compensates for Shading • Connectorized Cables • Remote SCADA Interface

  16. What to Do with Excess Power Grid-tied Off-grid Using Batteries Limited by Battery capacity Only requires DC to DC battery charger Batteries Need Conditioned Room, which will require building wiring • More efficient use of power • Requires two branch circuits • No Additional Space Required

  17. Questions?http://solarmaxdirect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/product-solar-panel-monocrytalline-mono-crystalline-thumbnail-150x150.jpgQuestions?http://solarmaxdirect.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/product-solar-panel-monocrytalline-mono-crystalline-thumbnail-150x150.jpg

More Related