440 likes | 546 Views
This interim facilities report for Quincy Public School District #172 assesses building capacity, operating costs, renewal schedules, and their impact on student performance. The report includes data gathering, defining capacity metrics for elementary, junior high, and high schools, facility conditions, and an appraisal instrument to evaluate educational adequacy. Initial findings highlight the correlation between facility conditions and student performance. The report emphasizes the need to improve infrastructure to support optimal learning environments.
E N D
Interim Facilities Report Quincy Public School District #172 September 25, 2013
Data Gathering • Demographic Info • Enrollment Projections • Capacity Analysis • Building Data Record • Operating Costs • Renewal & Replacement Schedule • Research on Facilities Condition & Student Performance
Defining Capacity • Building Planning Capacity • student enrollment that a school can best serve while fully utilizing its physical facilities. • combination of factors: • the number of teaching stations available, • the area of auxiliary spaces, and • the adopted program for a school of that level. • Capacity number is used for planning proposes, • enrollment boundaries • building utilization levels. • Each individually facility may be capable of handling physically many more students than its planning capacity, • The Planning Capacity is a practical capacity that provides for an easily understood and comparable number between facilities, as well as, providing an optimal operating size.
Defining Capacity - Elementary • Defined simply as 25 students per classroom multiplied by the number of classrooms • Classroom Size Factor • Reduced by 2 students with an average classroom size below 750 square feet • Reduced another 1 student if the average classroom size is below 650 square feet. • For example, building has 15 classrooms; the Planning Capacity would be 375, (25 x 15). If the room sizes were 725 sq. ft, the capacity would be 345, (23 x 15).
Defining Capacity – Junior High School • The Junior High capacity is defined utilizing 150 students for every four classrooms and one science lab. • Additionally, there is a minimum of one Art and Life Skills labs for every 750 students. • Each Junior High will have a band room, general music/vocal room, • Three rooms for special service programs
Defining Capacity – High School • High School capacity is defined as 175 Students for every four classrooms and one science lab. • One Art, Life Skills and Tech Arts Areas/Labs per 800 students. • Other areas are required and are determined by the curriculum and extra-curricular activities. • band and vocal music facilities • performing arts areas • athletic facilities. • Six classrooms for special service programs.
Building Information • Building Data Record • Building Age & Square Footage • Construction Timeline • Demographic Information • Enrollment • Free and Reduced Lunch • Information on Program Spaces • Information on Building Systems • Technology • Major Projects • Floor Plans • Aerial Site Plan • Attendance Map
Facilities Conditions and Student Performance • Studies support educators common sense - Students do better when they: • Hear well • See well • Are not packed into small spaces • Noise is not distracting • Lighting is good • Air Quality is good • Heat and cooling are balanced
Facilities Conditions and Student Performance • Educational Delivery • Milwaukee study suggest facility conditions have stronger affect on performance than other factors, such as family background, socio-economic status, attendance and behavior • Indoor Air Quality • About 40% of schools report unsatisfactory environmental conditions
Facilities Conditions and Student Performance • Temperature & Ventilation • Good ventilation systems are effective in keeping toxic and nuisance materials out of the air. • Acoustics • Studies have linked student hearing problems with being held back a grade • Lighting • The visual environment is one of the most important factors in learning, affecting mental attitude, class attendance, and performance
Appraisal Instrument • An Appraisal Guide for Older & Historic School Facilities • Developed by The Council of Educational Facility Planners International • A tool to evaluate the physical condition and educational adequacy of older and historic school facilities, and is designed to engage a broad audience in the appraisal process.
Appraisal Criteria • Educational Adequacy • Educational Environment • The School Site • Building Safety and Security • Structural Condition and Electrical & Mechanical Systems • Plant Maintainability
Appraisal Team • Team Members • Bill Sanders – QHS • Mike Carter – Klinger & Assoc. • Todd Moore – Architechnics, Inc. • Dave Schlembach - Poepping, Stone, Bach & Associates, Inc. • Dan Nutt – QPS MaintDept • Dane Barnes – QPS MaintDept • Dennis Peters – QPS MaintDept • Rick Selsor – QPS MaintDept • Rick Owsley – QJHS • Joel Murphy, Facilitator – QPS
Initial Findings • “Great Schools”, not so Great Facilities • “A good teacher can teach anywhere” • Physical Structure is limiting the learning experience • No Facility Rated higher than Satisfactory • Only one Elementary was rated Satisfactory • 7 out of 12 of our active facilities were rated Borderline • Grade Alignment out of sync with current practices
Initial Findings • Smaller Elementary Schools generate some operational inefficiencies • Large Intermediate School causes logistical and operational issues • Small Elementary & Intermediate Classrooms – Avg 750 Sq Ft • Undersized Gym & Cafeterias • Multiple Lunch Periods • Limited PE Activities • Relationship between spaces limiting • Restrooms located only on one floor • Movement restricted by Multi-Leveled buildings • Old and outdated Building designs limiting programs • Lack of Specialized Learning Areas • No Art Rooms • Music taught in converted classrooms or other spaces
Initial Findings • Library well undersized • Technology Access Limited • Computer Labs small or lacking • Low computer to student ratios • Space for teacher resource areas limited • Administrative Spaces very limited
Initial Findings • Most Elementary sites too small, lack adequate open space and parking • Most Elementary sites too small to allow for expansion of building • Vehicular & Pedestrian Traffic patterns not separated • Site Ingress/Egress Issue at Elementary sites • Bus Drop Off Areas • Parent Drop Off Areas • Staff/Visitor Parking
Initial Findings • Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive work • Deterioration due to ages of facilities • HVAC Inadequate • Fresh air exchange • Individual AC Units • Efficiency of older equipment • Poor Energy efficiency • Electrical system is unable to accommodate additional technology in classrooms • Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings • Maintaining “temporary” facilities • Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades
Initial Findings • Inability to meet ADA Requirements w/o extensive work • Deterioration due to ages of facilities • HVAC Inadequate • Fresh air exchange • Individual AC Units • Efficiency of older equipment • Poor Energy efficiency • Electrical system is unable to accommodate additional technology in classrooms • Trying to maintain 100+ year old buildings • Maintaining “temporary” facilities • Building systems “tired”, needed major upgrades
Educational Adequacy • District Average – 60% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate - 56% -Borderline • Berrian, Ellington & Baldwin –Poor • Quincy Jr High School - 67% - Borderline • Quincy High School - 64% - Borderline • ACRSS & ABC Academy - 67% Borderline • ECFC - 80% - Satisfactory
Educational Environment • District Average – 67% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate - 65% -Borderline • Quincy Jr High School – 75% - Satisfactory • Quincy High School – 81% - Satisfactory • ACRSS & ABC Academy – 75% - Satisfactory • ECFC - 79% - Satisfactory
The School Site • District Average – 69% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate - 67% -Borderline • Quincy Jr High School - 77% - Satisfactory • Quincy High School - 82% - Satisfactory • ACRSS & ABC Academy - 76% - Satisfactory • ECFC – 75% - Satisfactory
Building Safety & Safety • District Average – 66% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate – 64% -Borderline • Quincy Jr High School – 70% - Satisfactory • Quincy High School – 75% - Satisfactory • ACRSS & ABC Academy – 79% - Satisfactory • ECFC – 82% - Satisfactory
Structural Condition and Electrical & Mechanical Systems • District Average – 65% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline • Quincy Jr High School – 74% - Satisfactory • Quincy High School - 81% - Satisfactory • ACRSS & ABC Academy - 84% Satisfactory • ECFC - 83% - Satisfactory
Plant Maintainability • District Average – 64% - Borderline • Elementary & Intermediate - 61% -Borderline • Dewey - Poor • Quincy Jr High School - 64% - Borderline • Quincy High School - 78% - Satisfactory • ACRSS & ABC Academy - 80% Satisfactory • ECFC - 81% - Satisfactory
Next Steps Planning Parameters/Guidance Needed to Develop Recommendations Options to Address Finds Community Input Refining Options Develop Recommendations
Planning Parameters • Limiting Transitions/Grade Level Configurations • Current, 3 Transitions: K-3, 4-6, 7-9, 10-12 • Other Models • K-5, 6-8, 9-12 – 3 Transitions • K-8, 9-12 – 2 Transitions • Historical Preservation
Planning Parameters • Site Ingress/Egress • Bus Drop Off Areas • Parent Drop Off Areas • Staff/Visitor Parking • ADA Compliance • Need for Specialized Spaces • Cafeteria • Gym • Library • Music • Art • Other
Planning Parameters • Technology • Infrastructure • Devices • Size of School • Small schools – More Buildings • Larger Schools – Less Buildings • Neighborhood Schools • Sustainability/Energy Efficiency – “Green Bldgs” • Alternate Use for Buildings
Options to Correct Findings • New Construction • Additions • Renovations • Building Replacements • Cost Estimates? • Tax Impact?
Next Steps • Community Dialog 1 • School Size • Grade Configuration • Neighborhood schools • Historic Preservation • Refine Facility Options • Community Dialog 2 • Rate/Rank Facility Options • Gauge Support • Final Report & Recommendation to Board