1 / 26

Asian Institute of Technology Center in Vietnam

Asian Institute of Technology Center in Vietnam. Leadership Skills Workshop Nov. 18 to 20, 2002. Workshop Objectives. This seminar is designed as an interactive workshop The Course Leader’s responsibilities are to present (1) the latest developments in the field of Leadership and Change

janine
Download Presentation

Asian Institute of Technology Center in Vietnam

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Asian Institute of TechnologyCenter in Vietnam Leadership Skills Workshop Nov. 18 to 20, 2002

  2. Workshop Objectives • This seminar is designed as an interactive workshop • The Course Leader’s responsibilities are to present (1) the latest developments in the field of Leadership and Change • This will come from both theoretical research and the result of practical examples

  3. Participants’ Role • Participants’ responsibilities are to: • Contribute to the learning process by giving examples of the processes of leadership and change as practised in Viet Nam today • Evaluate the Course Leader’s theories and examples in the light of their own experience

  4. Outsider’s Perspective • From the viewpoint of a foreigner, the working environment in Viet Nam is changing e.g.: • The ruling Party is allowing members to participate in business • The Republic will join AFTA by 2010 • Opening to WTO and U.S. trade

  5. Forces of Change • The Republic will therefore be subjected to the same forces of change that impact the world trading community from the U.S. to Singapore • The ruling forces in world business today: • Technology • Globalisation • Education • Deregulation

  6. Historical Waves of Change • Leadership and change have evolved in tune with the tides of history: • In hunter-gatherer society, strength was the basis for leadership • In agricultural society, experience • In industrial age, knowledge & the logic of reductionism • In today’s knowledge economy, it is inductive and holistic reasoning

  7. Metaphor metamorphosis • Typical metaphor of the industrial age was to cast leader of a organisation as (1) driver (of a train) or (2) pilot (of a plane) • Today’s leadership metaphor are more organic, acknowledging that neither the head nor heart can exist without the rest of the body • The result is terms like DNA, nature/nurture, the holistic or systems approach have come into use

  8. East-West Convergence • As eastern philosophy has always been based on a holistic and not reductionist approach, the new way is leading to a merging of East-West paradigm • Globalisation has helped along the process as even conservative companies in U.S. and EU recognise the need to recruit talent from all over the world

  9. The Battle for Talent • U.S. recognises that its technical advances owe much to the thousands of talented IT professionals who go to Silicon Valley from East and South Asia • To close the gap between developing and developed countries, developing countries need to retain the talent it already has even if it does not recruit from outside

  10. Organisational Climate/Culture • According to management guru, Charles Handy, all organisations could be broadly categorised as four types: • Zeus (Greek Father-God) or Authoritarian • Apollo – a culture based or rules and regulations • Athena – a culture based on consultation with subordinates • Dionysius – a laissez faire culture

  11. Leadership Styles • The leadership style that prevails in organisations follow the culture: • Command and control for Zeus • Control and direct for Apollo • Consult for Athena • Participative Management for Dionysius • We’ll look into leadership styles later

  12. Leadership & Management • Leadership has a longer history than management • Even hunter-gatherer societies has their leaders, based upon strength and expertise in the hunt. Hence leaders were young • In agricultural societies, because experience was critical, older leaders prevailed

  13. Changing Leadership Traits • In the industrial age, leaders were those who knew more than their followers • In the knowledge economy, leadership roles are evolving again • While wisdom still counts, the IT savvy young has a clear advantage • The dot-com collapse reinforces the view that while IT is critical, it is still a supporting devise for strategy

  14. Genesis of Management • Management grew out of the need to construct order out of chaos • Its first practitioners were the military because they were the first to employ large numbers of people • Business corporations followed in the early 20th Century • Now business recognises that management is inadequate to deal with the rapidly changing environment today

  15. Management Tasks aim to simplify work for subordinates who do not have full picture: Planning Organising Controlling Leadership Tasks recognise that followers can help to achieve goals because they may know as much as leader: Setting Objectives Aligning Resources Motivating Followers Complexity and Change

  16. Ancient Wisdom of East & West • From ancient Greece, Socrates advised leaders to “Know Thyself” • From ancient China, Sun Tzu in his “The Art of War” advised military commanders that to win, they need to • Know Thyself • Know Thy Enemy • Know the Terrain

  17. Modern Sociological Studies • Modern sociological studies on the factors influencing the development of leaders confirm the ancient wisdom: • Cooley and the Looking Glass Theory • Mead on the interactive nature of personal development • Goffman on Impression Management

  18. Comparing 2 East-West Leaders • Study the early history of Lee Kuan Yew and Jack Welch to identify similarities and differences in their upbringing • How do you think their early experiences contribute to their later emergence as leaders? • What lessons do they hold for you?

  19. East-West Culture • Geert Hofstede studied differences in the thinking of East-West leaders and identified four primary dimensions: • Power Distance • Individualism-Communitarianism • Masculinity-Femininity • Uncertain Avoidance

  20. Other Divisions • Other identifiable differences: • Reductionism-Holistic Thinking • Guilt-Shame • Love-Justice • Nurture-Nature

  21. Organisational Culture • Edgar H Schein pursued the study of organisational culture in the 80s and defined three levels • Artefacts (the symbols that everyone recognises) • Espoused Values (what company says they are) • Underlying Assumptions (the real beliefs that determine the behaviour of members)

  22. Multiple Intelligences • In 1995, the concept of Emotional Intelligence (EI) propounded by Daniel Goleman jolted the world to a new reality • IQ or logical or mathematical intelligence was not the mainspring to success • IQ may be the necessary entry requirement but success belonged to those with high EI

  23. Multiple Intelligence • Goleman’s work led Prof Howard Gardner of Harvard to study other intelligences and he recognised seven: • Linguistics • Logical/mathematical • Musical • Kinesthetic • Spatial • Interpersonal • Intrapersonal

  24. Values and Performance • Further studies reveal more interesting observations • Intelligence of all varieties are randomly distributed • Still, some peoples perform better than others consistently in some activities • This led some observers to conclude that values (embedded in culture) affect performance

  25. Resolution of Conflicts • Conflicts in organisations are inevitable • They could be functional or dysfunctional • To achieve harmony, useful to teach the process of negotiations • Only 3 results: win-lose; lose-lose; win-win • To achieve win-win, need to seek common interest or supraordinate goal • But first, know your own negotiating style

More Related