400 likes | 586 Views
1. Question 1. Who popularized the term
E N D
2. 1 Question 1 Who popularized the term “Can we talk” during the 1980s?
a) Barry Manilow
b) Joan Rivers
Walter Mondale
AT&T Commercial
3. 2 Guidelines to Listening
4. 3 Agenda
5. 4 A Miscommunication in Romania BD-700 Global Express (by Bombardier’s Canadair Division)
6. 5 What do you think? “Reports of communication challenges between pilots and mechanics may have been greatly exaggerated”
7. 6 Question 2 The “Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated” can be attributed to:
Wiley Post
Johnny Cash
Samuel Clemens
Thomas Jefferson 1897 Samuel Clemens was living in London. His cousin ,Dr. John Ross Clemens came and visited him.
The Doctor got sick and it made the local paper. The names got confused and the New York Journal surmised Mark Twain was ill. They sent a reporter. Twain told him:
“The report of my illness grew out of his illness; the report of my death was an exaggeration.”
Reporter wrote:
“…the report of my death was an exaggeration….”
Has become:
“…the reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”
1897 Samuel Clemens was living in London. His cousin ,Dr. John Ross Clemens came and visited him.
The Doctor got sick and it made the local paper. The names got confused and the New York Journal surmised Mark Twain was ill. They sent a reporter. Twain told him:
“The report of my illness grew out of his illness; the report of my death was an exaggeration.”
Reporter wrote:
“…the report of my death was an exaggeration….”
Has become:
“…the reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”
8. 7 Communication Model - Simple
9. 8 Question 3 Your opinion on pilot to mechanic communication:
Not a problem
A challenge that is improving
A challenge that has not changed much
A significant safety issue
No opinion
10. 9 Sources of Information for this Presentation “Asking Around” Research
My Experience from an HF Class
Pilots
Mechanics
Cabin Crews
Gate Agents
Chief Pilot/Director of Aviation
Manager of Aircraft Maintenance
Directors of Operations, Engineering, and Safety
Director of Maintenance Control Center
FAA Airworthiness Inspectors
Accident Investigators
Professors and Researchers
11. 10 Hand Signals in China – Be Careful A Human Factors train-the-trainer in Frankfurt
Each participant must tell an HF story
The story
Incorrect hand signals can be a good thing! But don’t count on it!
12. 11 Guidelines for Transmitting
13. 12 A Few Interview Comments Gate agents on mechanics. Are you sure you are a mechanic?
Cabin Crew on mechanics
What mechanics had to say about that.
A 121 Pilot just transitioned from 135 and commented about maintenance.
14. 13 Director of Aviation Leadership (Management) must set the tone for the importance of write ups.
“You get the behavior that you reinforce.”
Formal debriefs with maintenance must be a final step in the trip. Before the APU is turned off!
Built a new facility and gave the maintenance personnel just as nice offices as the flight department, even bigger.
Tie financial EOY bonus pool to safety goals.
15. 14 Senior Captain Flight crews must see the importance of debriefing with maintenance crews.
Must be corporate motivation to debrief and document properly
Technical training is diminished for flight crews.
Military attitude: Air Force vs. Navy
Pilots must take ownership for the write-up. Follow-up & communicate to others
Be the Manager of Safety, even if you are not
16. 15 Guidelines for Decoding
17. 16 Director of Operations “Feed the ramp guys, hold a flashlight/umbrella for maintenance, and don’t enrage (aka, PO) the cabin crew!”
“To get respect, give respect.”
The pizza party challenge
Here is a significant questions:
18. 17 Question 4 How many mechanics that work on your aircraft can you say their full name?
1
2
3
>3
Not applicable
19. 18 Airline Maintenance Instructor Mechanic bias about pilot pay.
Pilots don’t give respect to pilots.
Pilot’s job ends when the segment is done.
Pilot’s ask good questions in type classes, but only at break.
When MCC does a poor communication job the mechanics have a problem.
Formalize reporting, like maintenance shift change
20. 19 Manager of Aircraft Maintenance Sees increasing growing atmosphere of teamwork/cooperation.
Pilot’s must try harder to get the “right information in the log, flagged, or in the debrief conversation.
In the corporate aviation world there is a lot of back and forth discussion.
Our mechanics have the pilot’s mobile phone numbers.
The “old days” are history.
21. 20 Question 4 “History repeats itself. That’s one of the things wrong with history.”
Yogi Berea
Clarence Darrow
Winston Churchill
Carl Hiaasen
22. 21 Director – Maintenance Control Center There is good communication in our company
FRM codes really help!
Verbal information gets lost! Write it up!
Teamwork is essential. Maintenance and Ops cannot afford poor communication.
Poor communication costs money!
23. 22 If you want excuses for Communication Challenges Culture
Language
Education
Earnings
Hierarchical Issues
Personality Traits
Corporate Processes
24. 23 The 3 Cs of Communication
25. 24 Question 5 Which is not part of the Communication Model?
a) Transmitting
b) Receiving
c) Decoding
d) Feedback
e) Broadcasting
26. 25 Written Communication
27. 26 Agenda
28. 27 Your Actions Build Post Flight Maintenance briefings into your SMS
Remind yourself of the simple communication model
The 3 “Cs”
Watch your “Transmit Key”
Strive for quality logbook entries
Make the effort, and make it formal
Pilot - Mechanic Communication – Can we talk?
29. 28 Question 6 Which statement best describes the pace of this presentation
a) Almost perfect
b) Seem like you just started
c) Precision approach
d) Keep Talking Dr.Bill
30. 29 Agenda
31. 30 Selected FAA Activities International Survey of HF
Completion of 2 Operator’s Manuals for HF
Maintenance
Airport Services
Aviation Safety Action Program Support
Action on HF Rulemaking
Future Considerations
Training Initiatives for Aviation Safety Inspectors
32. 31 Respondent Country and Experience Distribution: Online survey (80 items) 630 addresses.
Returns: 414 respondents (66%) from 54 countries.
Experience: 65% had more than 20 years aviation maintenance experience.
Each country could have had multiple respondents—for example, 160 respondents indicated USA, 35 for Canada.
Though it is obvious that we have a world-wide sample, because we were unable to systematically sample respondents, our conclusions are limited to a descriptive nature and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or practices of the entire aviation maintenance population. The following provides a general overview of the results.
So who answered the survey-some in the audience?
Next I will describe basic characteristics of the sample.
Distribution: Online survey (80 items) 630 addresses.
Returns: 414 respondents (66%) from 54 countries.
Experience: 65% had more than 20 years aviation maintenance experience.
Each country could have had multiple respondents—for example, 160 respondents indicated USA, 35 for Canada.
Though it is obvious that we have a world-wide sample, because we were unable to systematically sample respondents, our conclusions are limited to a descriptive nature and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or practices of the entire aviation maintenance population. The following provides a general overview of the results.
So who answered the survey-some in the audience?
Next I will describe basic characteristics of the sample.
33. 32 What type of Maintenance Organization? Of the 258 that indicated airline maint department, repair station entire a/c, and repair station components--- 228 indicated the type of airline maint operation with the majority at a major carrier.
You saw the span across the world of respondents—depending upon location the adhere to different regulations –could be voluntary—so we asked what regulatory authority did they design their maint program for?
Of the 258 that indicated airline maint department, repair station entire a/c, and repair station components--- 228 indicated the type of airline maint operation with the majority at a major carrier.
You saw the span across the world of respondents—depending upon location the adhere to different regulations –could be voluntary—so we asked what regulatory authority did they design their maint program for?
34. 33 Summary Findings Worker safety, flight safety, regulatory compliance are important motivators when implementing an HF program
Transport Canada and EASA countries have the most robust programs.
Strong regulations promote strong HF programs.
Fatigue issues are perceived to be important but little action.
When companies have programs they are similar.
Companies record event data but do not use it enough.
35. 34
36. 35 Selected FAA Activities International Survey of HF
Completion of 2 Operator’s Manuals for HF
Maintenance
Airport Services
Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP)
Action on HF Rulemaking
Future Considerations
Training Initiatives for Aviation Safety Inspectors
37. 36 Continued outreach & regulatory cooperation
Creation of Mx audit tools
Address issues of HF on new technologies
Multi-faceted approaches to studying maintenance fatigue
Future Challenges (1 of 2)
38. 37 Extending HF attention to Airport Operations.
Support and capitalize on voluntary reporting system data
Measurement of HF initiatives Future Challenges (2 of 2)
39. 38 A Training Tool for FAA Inspectors (Time permitting)
40. Human Factors Spectacles
41. 40 Summary