10 likes | 21 Views
<br>Regression testing is considered to be a highly effective testing type simply because it ensures that all the bugs that have been detected are fixed at the earliest.<br><br>With the inclusion of agile methodology, automated regression testing has proved to be a game-changer in terms of scaling up the efficiency and streamlining the development activities of agile software development.
E N D
</> What are the best practices for handling regression testing defects? Regression testing is considered to be a highly effective testing type simply because it ensures that all the bugs that have been detected are fixed at the earliest. With the inclusion of agile methodology, automated regression testing has proved to be a game-changer in terms of scaling up the efficiency and streamlining the development activities of agile software development. However, there will be regression defects that need to be tackled strategically through implementing certain best practices that can leverage regression testing activities. In this article, you will get to know what are the best practices for handling regression defects. 01 02 03 Effective management of time Test cases should be categorized Prioritizing test cases 04 05 Observe and analyze the budget constraints It is better to avoid rework Following are the best practices for handling regression defects: 1. Prioritizing test cases: The test cases need to be analyzed from a business requirements point of view along with the specific scenarios that need to be tested first. They can be sorted into three categories as follows: Priority 0 – Sanity test cases are included so that the basic functionality is checked as per the business requirement after an application goes through a major change Priority 1 – Test scenarios should be included, through which the crucial functionalities and requirements are checked Priority 2 – In here, the test cases have moderate value If test cases are strategically prioritized, the time is reduced and the regression defects can be controlled to a great extent. 2. Test cases should be categorized: When a specific application has a larger scope, then controlling regression defects becomes a complicated task as frequent code changes need to be made by the team. On the contrary, if the test cases are categorized, then the testing process becomes faster and easier. Following are the two categories that can be pondered upon: Obsolete – In here, only bug specific test cases can be considered that can be used in a single test cycle Reusable – Those test cases in the regression cycle that are used repetitively fall under this category. Automation and execution can take place after a new build 3. Effective management of time: In the current agile software development scenarios, there is steady pressure from the management for developing high-end quality applications that can be delivered at a faster pace. Certain phases of testing that are being ignored can be focused upon by the regression testing method. In order to make sure that the regression defects are minimized, sufficient time should be provided to the testers, so that the tests are properly executed and regression defects are controlled tactfully. 4. Observe and analyze the budget constraints: The implementation of regression testing isconsidered to be quite expensive. A decent amount of money is spent by organizations to test anapplication that has already been tested.From the management’s perspective, in most of the scenarios (depending upon the budget constraints and project scope) investing a huge amount for regression testing is not considered to be a feasible move. Stakeholders must be provided with strategic explanations as to why there is a need to perform regression testing and how regression defects can be minimized so that a quality software product can be built. 5. It is better to avoid rework: There are scenarios where the time allocated for a project is almost at a close and the management is focused to stop the testing process as early as possible. In this situation, certain minor bugs that have not been tested will be ignored by the testers. In this scenario, long-term thinking can be employed by the concerned teams. This will in turn help in developing a high-quality product and thus make the stakeholders happy. CONCLUSION If you are looking forward to implementing regression testing for your specific project, then do get connected with a premium software testing services company that will provide you with a comprehensive testing roadmap that is in line with your project specific requirements. www.TestingXperts.com To know more about our services please email us at info@testingxperts.com Scan the QR Code USA | CANADA | UK | NETHERLANDS | INDIA | SINGAPORE | SOUTH AFRICA © 2022 TestingXperts, All Rights Reserved to contact us © www.testingxperts.com