1 / 24

Second Language Acquisition.2

What?. Second Language Acquisition.2. Roml 700 Fall 2012. I know what this is!. But what are we supposed to do with it?. BUT…. “Helping Learners to learn does not require an understanding of SLA phenomena.” ICoSLA (International Commission on Second Language Acquisition).

jafari
Download Presentation

Second Language Acquisition.2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What? Second Language Acquisition.2 Roml 700 Fall 2012

  2. I know what this is! But what are we supposed to do with it?

  3. BUT… • “Helping Learners to learn does not require an understanding of SLA phenomena.” • ICoSLA (International Commission on Second Language Acquisition)

  4. Cognitive Linguistics • Efficiency • grammatical structures of language are directly associated with the way people conceptualize Ronald Langacker: “grammar is conceptualization”

  5. Multi-competence – Integration continuum • Mind of L2 user is a whole • L1 + interlanguage + L2 Cook, 2002 Grosjean, 2001

  6. Fundamental distinctions Competence Performance • Unconscious knowledge of a grammatical system • How linguistic knowledge is used

  7. What do we teach?

  8. Oh, crap! this is going to hurt!!

  9. Input • Learner’s source of information is the target language itself. • Intake = Learner processes language • Language must fall within the learner’s range of comprehension. • Different learners have different intake levels. Krashen’s I + 1

  10. Factors in traditional instructional methods that inhibit intake • Strict sequencing • Emphasis on productive skills • Limited interaction

  11. Using English in the classroom: NO • Children learning L1 can’t fall back on another language. • L1 and L2 should be kept in separate compartments in the brain. • Maximize quantity of exposure to L2. • Use L2 for real life functions.

  12. Using English in the classroom: YES • Cognitive styles Wholists Analytics Verbalisers Convergent thinkers Divergent thinkers Holists Serialists Single dimension: right-brain to left-brain Adaptation-Innovation … Acquisition Learning hypothesis Monitor hypothesis Natural Order hypothesis Input hypothesis Affective Filter hypothesis Hudson Witkin Ornstein Riding

  13. Using English in the classroom: HOW? • Teachers • Instructions, explanations • Use of L1 is supportive and facilitating • scaffolding • Students • Allows work within Zone of Proximal Development • Protects attitudinal balance between L1 and L2 Clay, 2005 Smagorinsky, 2007 ZPD: Lev Vigotsky, 1978

  14. Why correct errors?

  15. Acquisition theory • Learner will stop making errors when ready • Provide correct Input + 1

  16. Learning as process • Make error obvious • Model alternative • Explain why it’s important to produce the correct answer

  17. fossilization • “stopping short” (incompleteness) of native speaker proficiency • A central characteristic of any interlanguage is that it fossilizes… cases to develop at some point short of full identity with the target language. Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, (3), 209-231. Tarone, 1994 Motivation Ego boundaries Lack of empathy with TL speakers

  18. Pragmatics • Grammatical competence • Unconscious • Implicit knowledge the speaker has about language • Comes from the module of the mind associated with the human language faculty Chomsky, 1965 • Pragmatics • Real world knowledge • Not innate • The result of non-language specific abilities that change over the course of cognitive development

  19. How do we test achievement?

  20. Progress assessment • Is student a successful L2 user? (not “failed native speaker”) • What makes individual sense: specialized goals. Wanted Proper descriptions of successful L2 users: unique characteristics of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation.

  21. Proficiency assessment • American Council of Teachers of Foreign Languages • Minnesota Language Proficiency Assessment • Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research , Penn State • University of Iowa World Language Placement Tests developedat Brigham Young Achievement and Placement

More Related