1 / 64

On implicit evaluations

On implicit evaluations. Melissa J. Ferguson Cornell University. On implicit evaluations: “Phil” effects with “Tony” processing constraints. Melissa J. Ferguson Cornell University. Implicit attitudes. Attitudes toward stimuli that are generated spontaneously and sometimes nonconsciously.

ivo
Download Presentation

On implicit evaluations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. On implicit evaluations Melissa J. Ferguson Cornell University

  2. On implicit evaluations:“Phil” effects with “Tony” processing constraints Melissa J. Ferguson Cornell University

  3. Implicit attitudes • Attitudes toward stimuli that are generated spontaneously and sometimes nonconsciously

  4. Implicit attitudes • Attitudes toward stimuli that are generated spontaneously and sometimes nonconsciously • Typically generated within milliseconds after perceiving the respective stimuli

  5. Morris et al., 1999 • Murphy & Zajonc, 1993 • Niedenthal, 1990 • Öhman, 1986 • Whalen et al., 1998 • Winkielman et al., 2005

  6. Implicit attitudes are functional • Deliver important information about what is desirable or harmful quickly and spontaneously • Campbell, 1974 • Damasio, 1999 • Dennett, 1995 • Fazio, 1989 • Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 1990 • LeDoux, 1996 • Smith, Bruner, & White, 1956

  7. Implicit attitudes are functional • Implicit attitudes are also sensitive to the current relevance of the stimulus • They reflect not only whether a stimulus has been desirable on average, but whether it is particularly desirable at that very moment, given our goals • Seibt, Häfner, & Deutsch (in press) • Sherman et al. (2003) • Ferguson & Bargh (2004)

  8. Do they reflect current desirability? • Seibt et al. (in press) • Will hunger influence implicit attitudes toward food? sandwich wonderful sandwich horrible

  9. Do they reflect current desirability? • Seibt et al. (in press) • Will hunger influence implicit attitudes toward food? sandwich wonderful sandwich horrible Difference in speed of response

  10. Implicit positivity toward food-related stimuli Seibt et al. (in press) Facilitation (ms) Sated Hungry

  11. Implicit positivity toward food-related stimuli Seibt et al. (in press) Facilitation (ms) Sated Hungry

  12. Implicit positivity toward food-related stimuli Seibt et al. (in press) Facilitation (ms) Sated Hungry

  13. Do they reflect current desirability? • Ferguson & Bargh (2004) • Will playing a word game influence people’s implicit attitudes toward game-relevant stimuli? • If they have a goal to do well vs. not • If they are finished vs. still playing the game

  14. Implicit positivity toward game-relevant stimuli Ferguson and Bargh (2004) Facilitation (ms) Finished Still Playing

  15. Implicit positivity toward game-relevant stimuli Ferguson and Bargh (2004) Facilitation (ms) Finished Still Playing

  16. Implicit positivity toward game-relevant stimuli Ferguson and Bargh (2004) Facilitation (ms) Finished Still Playing

  17. Implicit evaluative readiness • When a goal is active, we implicitly evaluate goal-relevant stimuli more positively • Without much conscious thought or intention, we become evaluatively ready to pursue our current goal • Two questions about this phenomenon

  18. Question 1 - How conscious? • Evaluative readiness seems functional because it means that we can assess the current relevance of a stimulus in the blink of an eye • Within 150 ms after we encounter a stimulus, we have constructed it in a way that facilitates our current goal • (e.g., Lewin, 1936; Glenberg, 1997; Smith & Semin, 2004) • But how much conscious deliberation and thought is actually required for this kind of readiness?

  19. Question 1 - How conscious? • In all previous studies, even though the attitudes were implicit, the goal was fully conscious • When in a conscious goal state, people ruminate about the goal (e.g., Bandura, 1997; Oettingen & Gollwitzer, 2001, 2002) • Participants may have implicitly evaluated the goal-relevant stimuli as positive only because they were thinking consciously about their utility beforehand • Do people become evaluative ready even for a nonconsciously activated goal?

  20. Question 1 - How conscious? • Although the goal-relevant stimuli were evaluated in an implicit fashion, they were still supraliminally presented and thus consciously perceived • Participants may have employed strategic, goal-relevant processing at some point(e.g., Klauer, Roßnagel, Musch, 1997 ) • Does evaluative readiness emerge even in response to subliminal stimuli?

  21. Question 2 - How functional? • Should everyone show this kind of implicit preparedness? • Research would suggest that only those who are successful at a goal should show implicit evaluative readiness to pursue it

  22. Question 2 - How functional? • Implicit attitudes reflect behavioral tendencies • The more (and the more often) one shows implicit positivity toward a stimulus, the more that person should approach it • (e.g., Custers & Aarts, 2007; Fazio & Olsen, 2003; Rydell & McConnell, 2006; Petty, Fazio, & Briñol, in press; Wittenbrink & Schwarz, 2007) • Those who show increased implicit positivity toward goal-relevant stimuli when a goal is active should be more likely to “approach” them and succeed at the goal • Evaluative readiness for a goal as an implicit signature of successful pursuit of that goal

  23. Question 2 - How functional? • Implicit attitudes also increase respective behaviors • Increased implicit positivity toward a stimulus should increase motivation and approach behaviors toward it • (e.g., Custers & Aarts, 2005) • Those whose attitudes are generated implicitly (versus explicitly) should have an easier time enacting corresponding judgments and behaviors (e.g., Fazio, 1989; Fazio et al., 1992; Fazio & Powell, 1997) • Evaluative readiness for a goal as an implicit tool for the successful pursuit of that goal

  24. Question 2 - How functional? • Research suggests that evaluative readiness may be both an implicit signature and tool of successful regulation • Those who are successful at a goal should be the most likely to show this kind of implicit readiness

  25. Overview of research • Question 1 - How conscious? • Goal was nonconsciously activated • Goal-relevant stimuli presented subliminally • Question 2 - How functional? • Goal was difficult (variability of skill) • Skill measured objectively and subjectively

  26. Overview of research • Experiment 1 • Academic achievement goal • Implicit attitudes toward: • Grades • Library • Books

  27. Experiment 1 • Nonconscious goal priming • Scrambled sentence task • Academic goal (e.g., smart, graduation, achievement) • Control 1 - No goal (e.g., new, outside, moving) • Control 2 - Social goal (e.g., friends, laughing, social) • Subliminal attitude measure • Demographic questions • GPA used as criterion of skill in the academic domain

  28. Experiment 1 • Subliminal evaluative priming paradigm • Olson & Fazio, 2002 • Primes presented subliminally • Goal-relevant: grades, books, library • Control: chair, window, sky, etc. • Targets presented supraliminally • Positive adjectives (e.g., wonderful) • Negative adjectives (e.g., awful)

  29. Example trial &!%$}@# 56 ms * grades 28 ms - “Tony unconscious” &!%$}@# 42 ms time 98 ms wonderful Response

  30. Experiment 1 • Design • Goal priming • Academic achievement • Control 1 (No goal) • Control 2 (Social goal) • Skill • High • Low

  31. Experiment 1 • Hypothesis • Those in academic goal condition should implicitly evaluate the academic primes more positively • Only those who are highly skilled

  32. Experiment 1 • Results • Implicit positivity scores • Difference score that reflects how much academic primes facilitated RTs to positive vs. negative targets • Difference score for control primes used as covariate • Significant interaction between goal and skill • F(2,79) = 4.08, p = .02

  33. Implicit positivity toward goal-relevant primes by goal priming and skill (Ferguson, under review)

  34. Implicit positivity toward goal-relevant primes by goal priming and skill (Ferguson, under review)

  35. Implicit positivity toward goal-relevant primes by goal priming and skill (Ferguson, under review)

  36. Experiment 1 • Conclusions • Evaluative readiness emerged only for highly skilled • Even though goal was nonconsciously activated and stimuli were subliminal (or, very minimally processed)

  37. Experiment 1 • Remaining questions • High and low skill people may differ in their beliefs about the utility of the goal-relevant primes • Next experiment looks at implicit attitudes toward words related to the goal itself, rather than means • Does skill predict evaluative readiness even while holding (conscious) motivation constant? • Motivation is included as a covariate

  38. Experiment 1 • Remaining questions • How do we know that a goal is being activated? • Aarts, Gollwitzer, & Hassin (2004) • Bargh et al. (2001) • Chartrand & Bargh (1996) • Kawada, Gollwitzer, & Bargh (2004) • Still, how do we know that these effects result from the activation of a goal?

  39. Experiment 1 • Remaining questions • Goals have been distinguished from other constructs by their specific effects on behavior • Semantic priming effects decrease rapidly • (e.g., Higgins, Bargh, & Lombardi, 1985; Srull & Wyer, 1979) • Goal strength either stays the same or increases over the same short period of time • (e.g., Atkinson & Birch, 1970; Bargh et al., 2001)

  40. Overview of research • Experiment 2 • Academic achievement goal • Implicit attitudes toward achievement

  41. Experiment 2 • Nonconscious goal priming • Word search puzzle • Achievement (e.g., master, succeed, strive, achieve) • Control (e.g., plant, carpet, ranch, shampoo) • Subliminal attitude measure • Immediately or after a delay (map task) • Demographic questions about skill and motivation

  42. Experiment 2 • Evaluative priming paradigm • Subliminally presented primes • Goal-relevant: achievement • Control: chair, window, sky, etc. • Targets • Positive and negative adjectives

  43. Experiment 2 • Questionnaire • Demographic questions • Skill • How difficult do you find it to get high grades in your courses here at Cornell, on average? • How difficult do you find it to finish your course work here at Cornell, on average? • Motivation • How important is it to you to do well and achieve academically?

  44. Experiment 2 • Design • Goal priming (achievement, control) • Timing of attitude measure (immediate, delay) • Skill (high, low)

  45. Experiment 2 • Hypothesis • Those in the goal condition should show more positive implicit attitudes toward the goal prime • Only for high skill • The effect should not weaken over time

  46. Experiment 2 • Results • Implicit positivity scores • Significant interaction between goal, timing, and skill, F(1,83) = 5.23, p = .025 • Low skill, interaction of goal x timing, ns, p>.25 • High skill, F(1,45) = 4.11, p < .05

  47. Implicit positivity for high skill as a function of goal priming and timing (Ferguson, under review)

  48. Implicit positivity for high skill as a function of goal priming and timing (Ferguson, under review)

  49. Experiment 2 • Conclusions • Evaluative readiness emerged for highly skilled, even though goal was nonconsciously activated and stimuli were subliminal • Effect was stronger after delay, indicating a motivational construct • But! No effects on conscious motivation • (e.g., Aarts, Gollwitzer, & Hassin, 2004)

  50. Experiment 3 • Remaining questions • Goals have been activated implicitly, but because the goal primes were consciously perceived, may leave some room for conscious rumination • Subliminal goal priming task • Measured implicit attitudes toward means for the goal, but tested whether skill was correlated with beliefs about means

More Related