1 / 31

Annual Evaluation Training

Annual Evaluation Training. Fall 2010. ACADEMIC PERSONNEL UNIT Kimberly Rodrigues Executive Director Carolyn Frazier, Director Tina Jordan, Analyst Andra Strads, Analyst Pam Tise, Administrative/Executive Assistant David White, Analyst

ivi
Download Presentation

Annual Evaluation Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Annual Evaluation Training Fall 2010

  2. ACADEMIC PERSONNEL UNIT • Kimberly Rodrigues • Executive Director • Carolyn Frazier, Director • Tina Jordan, Analyst • Andra Strads, Analyst • Pam Tise, Administrative/Executive Assistant • David White, Analyst • For specific unit responsibilities, please visit our website at: http://ucanr.org/academicpersonnel

  3. Presenters • Executive Director Kim Rodrigues and UC ANR Academic Personnel Unit, with assistance from the AAC Personnel Committee

  4. Conference Call Agreements • One person speak at a time. • When asking questions, state your name first. • Put your cell phones on vibrate. • Mute your phone if you are not speaking.

  5. DesiredOutcomes • Increased understanding of the elements of the Annual Evaluation (AE). • Knowledge of how the AE will support the thematic PR. • Understanding that we have a shared responsibility for the success of AE as a performance evaluation tool.

  6. Agenda • Process Guide • Benefits of Annual Evaluations • Recent Changes • General Directions • Guidance • The AE Template • “Themes” and Examples • Guidance for Supervisors • Questions

  7. Process Guide • AE – Advisor CD – No higher level review • AE – County Director Bill, Barbara, or Don

  8. Benefitsof the Annual Evaluation • Creates a transparent system where academics know clearly what is expected of them throughout the performance cycle not just at the end of two or three years. • Provides opportunity to “shift gears.” • Provides a context for academic’s work within the strategic vision for the coming year. • Positions academics to use streamlined merit process.

  9. RecentChanges to the AE • Two templates: • Advisor/County Director (also non-campus based CE Specialists) • Academic Coordinators/Academic Administrators • Self-Assessment/Narrative section (Section A) covers all 4 elements and is focused on “themes.” • Tables in Section B contain supporting detail. • Affirmative Action: describe achievements. (no more importing of CASA) • Section B: All tables. • Similar to the PRs – thematic focus/format is required this year.

  10. Change to Section C • It is no longer necessary to chose whether or not to have Section C be confidential. • This information remains confidential. The change only makes it available to your immediate supervisor(s). • Sections A, B, and C can now be loaded together as a single document.

  11. General Directions • Include work from October 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010. • Be brief and concise. • Section A: limited to 8 pages. • Bibliography: include only those publications developed during the period under review and not previously reported. • Sabbatical Leave – upload sabbatical report completed during the review period if applicable

  12. AE Template & Guidelines • Template and Guidelines will be in your portal as soon as possible. When you “click” on it, it takes you to the Academic Personnel Annual Evaluation information found at: • http://ucanr.org/annualevaluation • AE Template is generated when you use DANRIS-X retrieval.

  13. Sample DANRIS-X Retrieval

  14. Position Description Discussion

  15. Annual Evaluation Template-AdvisorsSection A – Self-Assessment • Narrative Section – Program Summary • Statement of Assignment – if there have been changes to your assigned responsibilities or programmatic assignment (not yet in your position description). • Research, Extension and Creative Activity – describe major themes and goals of programs and the accomplishments and evidence of impact in past year. • Professional Competence/University and Public Service - 1-2 paragraph summary further supported by tables in Section B. • Affirmative Action – 1-2 paragraphs highlighting specific efforts and accomplishments. • Complete Guidelines at: • http://ucanr.org/annualevaluation

  16. Section B • This section only includes tables. • Fill in the “blanks” as applicable. • DANRIS-X • Advisors may use DANRIS-X. • Designed to be easily imported. • Find it in your portal. Due October 18th. Complete Guidelines at: http://ucanr.org/annualevaluation

  17. Section C (4 page limit recommended) • Goals for Coming Year: October 1, 2010-September 30, 2011 • Advisors have the option to use DANRIS-X • Barriers/Obstacles in Accomplishing your Goals Complete Guidelines at: http://ucanr.org/annualevaluation

  18. Section D • Supervisors evaluate academic and provide a narrative: • Indicate the areas that the academic is or is not meeting expectations for his/her level in each of the advancement criteria. • Provide suggestions for improvement and for advancement. Complete Guidelines at: http://ucanr.org/annualevaluation

  19. Thematic PR is Mandatoryin 2011 • Beginning this year, thematic PR’s are required. • In 2010, both formats were accepted.

  20. Describing your Work According to Themes • Advisors • Research, Extension and Creative Activity • Coordinators & Administrators • Administration and Coordination of Programs

  21. Shift Shift From writing a section on each project/activity To integrating several activities under themes

  22. Organizing your Work into Themes • List all of your projects/programs first, and then group projects that target the same issue together. Each of these groups is a theme. You can look at these closely and identify the common goals, accomplishments and impacts. • Use initiatives from the Strategic Vision (or challenges described in the Vision) for your themes.

  23. Theme ExamplesFarm Advisor, FT Advisor Step VII • My research and extension program is based on the major theme of interactions between plants and microorganisms. Because of my interest, training and experience with plant pathology and microbial ecology, I focused my activities on three areas of plant-microbe interactions: • Pathogens of plants (summary of 16 projects) • Microbial ecology in strawberry (summary of 7 projects) • Foodborne pathogens and ecology of E. coli. (summary of 2 projects)

  24. Theme Example4-H YDA, Assistant IV I addressed challenges and needs by conducting research and extending knowledge in three themes aligned with ANR’s Strategic Vision: • Promote Positive Youth Development • Support Adolescent Leadership Development • Increase Science Literacy Among Youth

  25. Theme ExampleNFCS Advisor, Assistant IV I expanded the scope of my activities in research, extension, and creative activity while at the same time ensuring I was strategically positioning my administrative and programmatic efforts in ways that integrated the local county needs with the UC ANR Strategic Vision: human nutritional status, child obesity, food safety, and food security.

  26. Guidance to Supervisors • Use the AE as formal feedback. Give it the same consideration you would give a PR. • Provide mentoring. • IMPORTANT - Review AE and meet early with academics who may be eligible to submit Streamlined Merits. • Contact advisors who are on sabbatical and suggest they submit an AE if they may be eligible for a Streamlined Merit in the near future.

  27. Guidance to Supervisors When writing your recommendation: • Prepare your letter with care – provide context, clarify anomalies - do not just restate what is already said. • Evaluate academic against position description and academic criteria. • Inform academic of your recommendation in writing before you upload it.

  28. Guidance to Supervisors • Navigating towards positive change(s). • Developing shared goals. • Updating PDs, as needed. • Establishing periodic check-ins throughout the year, as needed.

  29. Deadlines Deadlines Deadlines Deadlines

  30. Annual Evaluation Timeline

  31. Questions??

More Related