400 likes | 488 Views
Explore how hippocampal place cells and head direction cells encode spatial information, memory consolidation during sleep, and the neural mechanisms of synaptic plasticity related to learning behaviors in rats. Understand the computational processes involved in navigation and spatial representation in the brain.
E N D
PART 4: BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY #25: SPATIAL NAVIGATION IN RATS II • spatial learning • cells that code for space • synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus • experiments that are knockouts • summary
PART 4: BEHAVIORAL PLASTICITY #26: SPATIAL NAVIGATION IN RATS II • spatial learning • cells that code for space • synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus • experiments that are knockouts • summary
CODING SPACE – HIPPOCAMPAL PLACE CELLS • place cells encode more than simple space • T-maze, trained (fruit loops) to alternate L & R turns • subset of place cells showed interesting pattern • e.g., activity (sector 3) anticipating right turns only • suggests hippocampal network represents episodic memories, cells are small segments of an episode • link of cells with overlapping episodes memories
CODING SPACE – HIPPOCAMPAL PLACE CELLS • spatial dreaming • large # space cells • only ~ 15% active in any 1 environ. • some silent in one environ., active in others • time- & labor-intensive to get larger picture • device to measure 150 cells at once • population or ensemble code • code predicts rat behavior in maze • many environments & codes • overlapping, not interfering • used to study plasticity...
CODING SPACE – HIPPOCAMPAL PLACE CELLS • spatial dreaming • plasticity • strengthening of code learning • accompanied by reduced inhibitory activity • does code relate to consolidated (permanent) memory • trained rats in spatial task • measured code during • training • sleeping before training • sleeping after training • dreaming replay of events memory consolidation
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • navigation requires knowledge of • place • direction... another class of cells... • in another structure... postsubiculum • cells fire ~ head position
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • basic features of head direction cells • retain direction preference in novel environments • ~ 90° arc around preferred direction • populations of cells with different preferences • not ~ rat position in environment • ~ independent of rat’s own behavior
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • common features of head direction cells & place cells • influenced by salient external cues • direction cells also fire after cues (light) removed • capable of deduced reckoning • using ideothetic cues • informed by vestibular and visual input • direction cells do not remap in a novel environments
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • navigation involves computation by the brain • temporal process (~ video vs photograph) • memory of past events • prediction of future events • processed by sub-populations of head direction cells • 2 areas measured in behaving rats • postsubicular cortex (PSC) • anterodorsal nucleus (ADN) of thalamus
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • navigation involves computation by the brain • analyzed firing pattern relative to momentary head direction • both cell types have preferred direction
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • navigation involves computation by the brain • analyzed firing pattern relative to angular velocity • PSC retain preference • ADN shift preference future position
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • navigation involves computation by the brain • ADN shift preference predict future position • e.g., if a cell (of many) prefers 180° it may fire @ • 160° when 180° • 200° when 180° • 180° when @ 180° (future = present)
CODING SPACE – HEAD DIRECTION CELLS • why bother with all of this?... in theory... • deductive reckoning circuit • direction cells work by integrating internal cues • ADN cells combine information about • current head direction • head movement (turning) • proposed that PSC & ADN cells... • constitute a looping circuit, compute direction by • integrating motion/time • but... how is “time” measured?
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS • how do place cells and head directions cells • learn to change their preferences? • maintain their preferences over time? • clues from electrophysiology experiments... • brief, high-frequency stimulation of trisynaptic circuit... • all 3 pathways
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY IN THE HIPPOCAMPUS • increased excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in postsynaptic hippocampal neurons • synaptic facilitation • increase lasts for hours • 3 sites, 3 patterns, CA1 • measured in brain “slices” • phenomenon called long-term potentiation (LTP) • a very big deal in mammalian cell.-phys. of learning • but... difficult to demonstrate relevance for behavior
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP IN CA1 • 3 properties of LTP in hippocampus CA1 neurons cooperativity: a minimum # of CA1 fibers must be activated together (1 weak, 2 bottom strong)
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP IN CA1 • 3 properties of LTP in hippocampus CA1 neurons associativity: a weak tetanus paired with a strong will gain - by association - value of strong • measured in response after “training” (3 top) • features ~ behavior, associative learning
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP IN CA1 • 3 properties of LTP in hippocampus CA1 neurons specificity: LTP can be restricted to single activated pathway (2 bottom), others unchanged (2 top) • localized to • regions of hippocampus • inputs regions on single cells (2)
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP IN POSTSYNAPTIC CELLS • CA1 pyramidal neurons • LTP in CA1 is dependent on pyramidal neurons (PNs) • inhibition of PN activity blocks LTP in CA1 • hyperpolarize PN membrane blocks LTP in CA1 • blocked inhibition of PN facilitates LTP in CA1 • depolarize PN membrane • facilitates LTP in CA1 during weak tetanus • not on its own (i.e., effect is associative) • the postsynaptic cell must be depolarized for LTP to occur in the presynaptic cell
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • glutamate (GLU), main excitatory transmitter (brain) • N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) 1 (of many) receptors • LTP requires depolarization to open NMDA channel • doubly gated channel, by.. GLU (receptor) & voltage (sensor)
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • evidence for NMDA involvement in LTP • NMDA blockers, e.g. aminophosphnovalerate (APV) • blocks NMDA activity • blocks LTP cooperativity: GLU from • weak input depolarize postsynaptic cell • strong input depolarizes postsynaptic cell associativity: GLU from • strong input depolarizes postsynaptic cell • weak input (paired) opens NMDA channels*
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • evidence for NMDA involvement in LTP • Hebb’s Rule: synapses are strengthened if a presynaptic cell repeatedly participates in driving spikes in a postsynaptic cell • GLU & NMDA receptor satisfies the rule • have coincident activity of cells • presynaptic release of GLU receptors • postsynaptic depolarization by non-NMDA receptors
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • Ca++ influx into the postsynaptic cell is required for LTP • block calcium (buffer) • blocks LTP • calcium influx through NMDA receptor/channel
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • evidence for NMDA involvement in LTP specificity: dendritic spines • NMDA receptors on dendritic spine heads • Ca++ entry restricted by necks • anatomical subdivisions
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • evidence for NMDA involvement in LTP specificity: dendritic spines • NMDA receptors on dendritic spine heads • Ca++ entry restricted by necks • anatomical subdivisions
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • Ca++ influx into the postsynaptic cell is required for LTP • Ca++ LTP mediated by 2nd messenger signaling • Ca++/calmodulin kinase (CaMKII) • protein kinase C (PKC)
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • 2 types of LTP described in CA1 neurons • early-phase LTP (E-LTP) • 1 3 h • cAMP & protein synthesis-independent • late-phase LTP (L-LTP) • 10 h + • cAMP & protein synthesis-dependent • LTP in rats ~ • long-term synaptic facilitation in Aplysia • long-term memory in Drosophila
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & NMDA RECEPTORS • 2 types of LTP described in CA1 neurons • early-phase LTP (E-LTP) • 1 3 h • cAMP & protein synthesis-independent • late-phase LTP (L-LTP) • 10 h + • cAMP & protein synthesis-dependent • LTP in rats ~ • long-term synaptic facilitation in Aplysia • long-term memory in Drosophila
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & SPATIAL LEARNING • does LTP have anything to do with learning?... difficult • spatial learning & memory in the water maze • block LTP with AP5 • block memory • ask the 3 Qs... correlation? necessity? sufficiency?
SYNATPTIC PLASTICITY – LTP & SPATIAL LEARNING • does LTP have anything to do with learning?... difficult • spatial learning & memory in the circular platform maze • aging LTP ~ • aging memory • ask the 3 Qs... correlation? necessity? sufficiency?
EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE KNOCKOUTS (MOUSE) • genetic engineering - e.g. already with Drosophila • transgenic “knockouts” (also “knockins”) • single gene manipulations LTP & spatial learning • fyn gene knockout are tyrosine kinase– and... • knockouts of CaMKII– • LTP in CA1 cells • spatial learning • ask the 3 Qs... correlation? necessity? sufficiency?
EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE KNOCKOUTS (MOUSE) • CaMKII knockouts - enzyme cannot be Ca++ modulated • LTP impaired (in “functional” range) • place cells • fewer • specificity • focus stable • platform maze • spatial learning • ask the 3 Qs...
EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE KNOCKOUTS (MOUSE) • NMDA receptor knockouts • LTP severely impaired • place cells (multi-elect.) • specificity • coordinated firing • NMDA-receptor-mediated synaptic plasticity required for proper representation of space in CA1 region of hippocampus
EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE KNOCKOUTS (MOUSE) • NMDA receptor knockouts • water maze • spatial learning • ask the 3 Qs... • arguments more compelling with each experiment • spatial & temporal targeting of knockout, correlation of lesion, LTP, behavior remains
SUMMARY • spatial navigation uses 2 types of cues • external (landmarks) • internal (ideothetic) deductive reckoning (memory) • spatial navigation studied in rats using • radial arm maze • T-maze • water maze • circular platform maze
SUMMARY • tasks are designated as • spatial (using distal cues) • cued (or non-spatial, using proximal cues) • lesion studies, hippocampus for spatial learning • if lesions precede learning • working & reference memory tasks are impaired • cued tasks are not impaired • if learning precedes lesions • time between events important • usually older memories are less affected
SUMMARY • two classes of neurons encode space place cells, CA1 hippocampus • firing field • stability ~ weeks, memory • influenced by • external cues (landmarks) • internal cues (vestibular, visual ~ motion) • field in dark ~ active • can be event-related, predictive (e.g., turning) • work together ensemble code • replay in sleep... consolidation?... dreaming?
SUMMARY • two classes of neurons encode space head direction cells, CA1 hippocampus • fire ~ head direction • similarly influenced by • external cues (landmarks) • internal cues (vestibular, visual ~ motion) • 2 types of cells • PSC cells encode current direction • ADN cells encode future direction
SUMMARY • LTP is a prominent form of hippocampal synaptic plasticity, with the following properties: • cooperativity • associativity • specificity • LTP in CA1 neurons ~ NMDA receptor, 2 requirements: • depolarization of the postsynaptic cell • binding of glutamate with the NMDA receptor • allows channel opening, Na+ & Ca++ influx • Ca++ influx is required for induction of LTP
SUMMARY • NMDA receptor mechanism for Hebb’s Rule • Evidence that LTP underlies (or is involved with) mechanisms for learning • drugs blocking LTP also block spatial learning • aging affects LTP and spatial learning • mice knockouts for “LTP genes” show deficits in • LTP • place cell properties • spatial learning