160 likes | 235 Views
This research explores student learning and teaching practices in carbon-transforming processes, examining the impact of different teaching strategies and support for student inquiry on learning gains. The study compares classrooms with high and low learning gains, analyzing differences in teaching practices and student opportunities for feedback. Data sources include classroom video analysis of activities like burning ethanol and modeling photosynthesis. The study aims to understand how teacher implementation of the curriculum influences student learning outcomes and provides implications for curriculum revision and professional development workshops.
E N D
Student Learning and Teaching Practices in Carbon-Transforming Process Jiwon Kim, Li Zhan, Jennifer Doherty, and Charles W. AndersonMichigan State University National Research in Science Teaching Conference Puerto Rico, April 6, 2013
Research Background Student Learning Progression Force-dynamic Reasoning Scientific Reasoning • Teaching Strategies • supporting student inquiry • supporting students accounts
Research Questions • How do student learning gains differ by teachers? • How do differences in teachers’ implementation of the curriculum affect student learning?
Finding: Student Learning Gain by Teachers High learning gain classrooms Low learning gain classrooms
3 Differences in Teaching Practices • How content is discussed • How teachers scaffold student learning • Students’opportunities for feedback
MS Comparison: Burning Ethanol Activity Burning Ethanol
HS Comparison: Modeling Photosynthesis Modeling Photosynthesis
Differences in Teaching PracticesHS – Modeling Photosynthesis
Limitations • Exploratory study • Other possible factors – e.g., school demographic
Implications • Curriculum Revision for Cohort 2 • PD workshops • More systematic, complete data collection