1 / 12

Some Potential Issues for Consideration on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Meal

Some Potential Issues for Consideration on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Meal. See informal document No. 4 (2004). A presentation to the Group of Experts on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Metal Geneva, Switzerland 5-7 April 2004. UNECE secretariat.

Download Presentation

Some Potential Issues for Consideration on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Meal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Potential Issues for Consideration on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Meal See informal document No. 4 (2004) A presentation to the Group of Experts on Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Metal Geneva, Switzerland 5-7 April 2004 UNECE secretariat

  2. Regulatory Infrastructure • Issue 1 (Q RI 3) – Adoption of the IAEA Code of Conduct for the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  3. Regulatory Infrastructure Detailedresponsesshowwide range ofstandards used • Issue 2 (Q RI 6) – Potential need to globally standardize levels below which materials are exempted from control Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  4. Regulatory Infrastructure May needto reassesssince onlyfocussed onnuclear andnot radioactivematerialfacilities • Issue 3 (Q RI 7) – Release of materials from facilities Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  5. Monitoring • Issue 4 (Q M 2) – Release of materials from facilities – need to establish stronger regime for monitoring imported or exported scrap metals Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  6. Monitoring Disparityin where (and if) monitoringoccur (Q M 3) wasnot a “yes”or “no”question. • Issue 5 (Q M 3) – Location in distribution chain where scrap metals should be monitored Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  7. Monitoring Also, seeQ M 4throughQ M 7 and Q M 9 throughQ M 12 • Issue 6 (Q M 8, 13 and 14) – Potential need to globally standardize many aspects of the monitoring of metal products Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  8. Dispostioning • Issue 7 (Q D 2) – Arrangement for disposal facility or return to manufacturer program Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  9. Dispositioning If material isradioactivematerial perdefinition of IAEA TS-R-1, thentransport according toTS-R-1 • Issue 8 (Q D 5 & 6) – Potential need to globally acknowledge that protocols (standards) already exist for transport of detected radioactive materials Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  10. Contractual • Issue 9 (Q C 2 through 5) – Potential need to consider strengthening contractual requirements on the acquisition of scrap metal Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  11. Reporting • Issue 10 (Q R 1, 2, 4 & 6) – Potential need to consider standardizing and strengthening reporting and investigating procedures Potential Scrap Metal Issues

  12. Experience About 60 percent of responders to the questionnaire provided insights into experience • Potential need to develop mechanism for exchanging information on practices and lessons learned in the area of Monitoring of Radiologically Contaminated Scrap Metal Potential Scrap Metal Issues

More Related