300 likes | 460 Views
-Outline- Introduction B + ΛΛ K + B + p Λγ Threshold enhancement Charmed baryonic modes Conclusion. Baryonic B decays at BELLE. Min-Zu Wang National Taiwan University (Belle Collaboration). mwang@phys.ntu.edu.tw. Introduction. Baryonic decays: a unique feature of B meson
E N D
-Outline- • Introduction • B+ΛΛK+ • B+pΛγ • Threshold enhancement • Charmed baryonic modes • Conclusion Baryonic B decays at BELLE Min-Zu Wang National Taiwan University (Belle Collaboration) mwang@phys.ntu.edu.tw ICHEP04
Introduction • Baryonic decays: a unique feature of B meson • Well established after few years of B-factory running • BF(2-body) < BF(3-body) < BF(4-body) • Threshold enhancement in the baryon-antibaryon system • Searching ground for exotic states • Recent status report: H.Y. Cheng, hep-ph/0311035 ICHEP04
b s g s s B+ΛΛK+ 140fb-1 threshold peaking First observation of bs s s decay Signal Yield in 2D fit: 19.9 Efficiency: 4.0%-6.9% Statistical Significance: 7.4σ BF: 2.91 ± 0.38 x 10-6 • First Charmless B decay with two Λ! • Threshold enhancement again. • Compliment to BφK(*)(bsss penguin) +6.5- 5.1 +0.90- 0.70 submitted to PRL ICHEP04
Compare with Bppπ • buud transition with ss popping Search for B+ΛΛπ+ 140fb-1 • Result • Number of Background: 37.5±1.0 • Number of Observed events:41 • Number of Signal UL: < 21.7 No significant signal found for these two modes. 90% confidence-level upper-limit: B (B+ΛΛπ+)<2.8x10-6 Submitted to PRL ICHEP04
B+pΛγ 140fb-1 bsγMC • First observation!Simultaneous fit on BpΛγ and BpΣ0γSignal Yield for BpΛγ with MpΛ<2.4GeV/c2: 34.1 • Statistical Significance: 8.6σ • BF(BpΛγ ): 2.16 ± 0.20x10-6BF(BpΣ0γ):<3.3 x 10-6 pΛγSignal Preliminary Theoretical prediction: *Pole Model: Phys.Lett. B533 (2002) BF(B pΛγ ) ~ 1.2x10-6 BF(B pΣ0γ) ~ 2.9x10-9 *QCD counting rules: (hep-ph/0405283) BF(B pΛγ ) ~ (1.2-2.4)x10-7 BF(B pΣ0γ) ~ (2.8-6.5)x10-7 +7.1- 6.6 +0.58- 0.53 ICHEP04
γ Photon energy and Angular distribution θx p Fit results in bins of cosθX with MpΛ<4.0GeV/c2 (Assuming XpΛ, calculated in X rest frame.) Λ qq background bsγMC Signal Yield Signal Yield ICHEP04
Improved B+ppK+measurement 140fb-1 threshold peaking Signal Yield in 2D fit: 216.5 Efficiency: 28.3%-35.2% BF: 4.59 ± 0.50 x 10-6 (4.89 x 10-6 PRL92, 131801, 2004) +17.3- 16.6 Preliminary +0.38- 0.34 ICHEP04
p Өp X K+ bs dominant process Fragmentation picture p at pp rest frame s u K+ p u d u u s u u d p Angular distribution: ppK+ ppK signal Proton against K- (p against K+) : flavor dependence! ICHEP04
Glueball Search Possible Hints and Search for Glueball Production in Charmless Rare B Decays Chun-Khiang Chua, Wei-Shu Hou and Shang-Yuu Tsai(PLB544,2002) Preliminary Scanning through the mass region from 2.2 to 2.4 GeV region No significant signal is found. We set a 90% confidence-level upper limit:BF(B+ glueball K+) x BF( glueball pp) < 4.1x10-7 ICHEP04
Improved B0ppKs measurement 140fb-1 threshold peaking Signal Yield in 2D fit: 28.6 Efficiency: 15.4%-21.0% BF: 1.04 ± 0.12 x 10-6( 0.78 x 10-6 PRL92, 131801, 2004) +6.5- 5.8 Preliminary +0.26- 0.19 ICHEP04
n K+ Θ+ p K0 Θ+ d d u u d u d u u d d u s s u d d u s s Pentaquark search in ppKs • Θ+(1540) : uudds • Θ+ K+n Θ+ K0 p • B0 Θ+ pB0 ppK0, B ppKsSearch for B signal with a 20 MeV pKs mass window cut at 1540MeV ICHEP04
Pentaquark search in ppKs Preliminary Fixed background shape from sideband data Count the events in signal region and compare with background estimation BF product upper limit < 2.3 x10-7at90% C.L. ICHEP04
140fb-1 Improved B0pΛπ- measurement threshold peaking Signal Yield in 2D fit: 48.4 Efficiency: 10.4%-12.6% BF: 3.27 ± 0.46 x 10-6(2.73 x 10-6 PRL90, 201802, 2003) +8.2- 7.4 Preliminary +0.61- 0.43 ICHEP04
p p π- Өp Өp X X Λ at pπ- rest frame π- Λ Angular distribution: pΛπ- at pΛ rest frame Fragmentation picture ICHEP04
b c u d B- LC+ p p - Belle: new results 140 fb-1 Preliminary BF x 10-5 264±20 signals +0.74 - 0.66 +0.56 - 0.49 + 6.6 - 5.9 SC(2455)0 32.6 + 5.7 - 5.0 SC(2520)0 12.8 Observation of new 2-body decay sideband ~ 25% of total BF ICHEP04
B- LC+ p p - M(Lc+p) structure (Lc+p) mass (LC+p) Low mass structure Phase space function B signals by DE fit for each mass bin M(Lc+p -)>2.6 & M(pp-) >1.6GeV/c2 to remove Sc(2455/2520) & D(1232) Preliminary 6.2s significance SC0(LC+p-) +0.02 -0.03 M = 3.34 ±0.02 GBW = 0.09±0.04 ±0.04 +0.77 - 0.72 BF = ( 3.87±0.43 ±1.01 ) x 10 - 5 ICHEP04
M(Lc+p) <3.6GeV/c2 p B- LC+ p p - Helicity distribution MC helicity c2 /nd Solid line : 0 0.97 Dashed line : 1 1.58 Helicity angle Preliminary Lc+ Q data: dots MC : histograms in B - at rest (Lc+p) direc. ( by DE fit for each mass bin ) ICHEP04
B0 LC+ p p - p - Intermediate 3-body decays Belle 140 fb-1 Sc++(2455) Sc0(2455) 41.0±8.0 35.2±7.8 M(Lc+p +)+c.c. Sc++(2520) Sc0(2520) M(Lc+p -)+c.c. 58±14 19±11 (*1) total BF M(Lc+p ) Preliminary ICHEP04
M(Lc+p) structure in 3, 4 body decays B- (Lc+p) p- Preliminary consistent with 4-body MC phase space, fine structures ? B0 (Lc+p) p+ p- MC 4-body phase space B Signals by DE fit SC++/0 (2455/2520) excluded ICHEP04
Conclusion • First b → sss hyperonic decay found • First b → s γ baryonic decay found • The threshold enhancement in the baryon-antibaryon pair system supports a fragmentation picture • Detailed structures studied in charmed baryonic decays • No hints for pentaquarks and glueballs yet • Keep searching for all kinds of baryonic decay channels, possible pentaquarks, glueballs and especially direct CP violation with increasing statistics ICHEP04
p ∆φ B = 1.5T Λ IP π Fly length ∆r Zdist Λ reconstruction Good Λselection is applied in those analyses. X Z Y ICHEP04
Thretical Prediction • The radiative baryonic B decays (BBB’γ) are of interest because of the rich spin structures. (CP / T violation). They could arise from bsγ transition. • Predicted Branching Fraction: • Pole Model: (hep-ph/0311035) Phys.Lett. B533 (2002) • Br(B PΛγ ) ~ 1.2x10-6 • Br(B PΣ0γ) ~ 2.9x10-9 • QCD counting rules: (hep-ph/0405283) • Br(B PΛγ ) ~ (1.2-2.4)x10-7 • Br(B PΣ0γ) ~ (2.8-6.5)x10-7 • Upper-bound from CLEO: • Br(B PΛγ )+0.3Br(BpΣ0γ)|Eγ>2.0GeV< 3.3x10-6 • 0.4Br(B PΛγ )+ Br(BpΣ0γ)|Eγ>2.0GeV< 6.4x10-6 ICHEP04
Electron 8 GeV Positron3.5 GeV e+ + e- Υ(4S) B+ + B- e+ + e- Υ(4S) B0 + B0 The KEKB-factory Tsukuba Interaction Point 3Km Υ(4S) (10.58GeV/c2) = 0.425 ICHEP04
Aerogel Cherenkov Cnt. n=1.015~1.030 SC solenoid 1.5T ECLCsI(Tl) TOF counter Extreme Forward Calorimeter CentralDriftChamber small cell +He/C2H5 KLMm / KL detection 14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe Silicon VertexDetector Belle Detector 3.5 GeVe+ 8 GeVe- ICHEP04
Particle Selection • We use the PID (ACC+CDC+TOF) system to identify the charged particles. • Proton: • Kaon: • Pion: • Λ: reconstructed from Λpπ- TO From Fake rate ICHEP04
e- e- e+ e+ Υ(4S) B B B Signal Reconstruction In Υ(4S) rest frame: ∆E Mbc 2D scatter plot 1D projection plot ICHEP04
Υ(4S) B decay continuum events Background suppression • The main background for B0pΛπ- and B+ΛΛπ+is continuum qq events. (q=u,d,s,c). • The Topology of continuum events and B decays are different. We choose |cosθThrust| S⊥ R2so R4so R2oo R3oo R4ooas the fisher input and combine it with cosθBto calculate the likelihood ratio. • We define the Super-fox wolfram moment (F) like:We use Fisher’s discriminant to optimize the coefficients. ICHEP04
uds charm off Data sideband uds charm off Data sideband Background Suppression SFW Moment (F) Signal MC Likelihood Ratio (LR) uds charm cosθB distribution Data sideband off Optimized by study ICHEP04
Signal Extraction ∆E Mbc • PDFs: • Background modeling: a line (curve) to represent the ∆E and the following parametrization first suggested by ARGUS group to represent the Mbc. • Signal modeling: a double Gaussian for ∆E and a Gaussian for Mbc. • 1D-binned fit: maximum Likelihood fit • Branching fraction are calculated by ∆E fit • Mbc fit for cross-check. • 2D-unbinned fit (∆E-Mbc): Extended maximum likelihood fit. ∆E Mbc ICHEP04
Angular distribution: ppK+ Background yield of ppK+ J/ψK+ (J/ψpp) Consistent with qq background process No fragmentation signature in J/ψK+ ICHEP04