1 / 6

NAESB BPS “First-To-Curtail/Last-To-Curtail” Sub Team

NAESB BPS “First-To-Curtail/Last-To-Curtail” Sub Team. October 07, 2011. Status check as of Oct 05, 2011. October 07, 2011 Agenda. Parking Lot # 19 – Review Bert’s power point presentation – Bert Bressers Parking Lot # 19 & 24: discuss & clarify – Bert Bressers

iniko
Download Presentation

NAESB BPS “First-To-Curtail/Last-To-Curtail” Sub Team

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NAESB BPS“First-To-Curtail/Last-To-Curtail” Sub Team October 07, 2011

  2. Status check as of Oct 05, 2011

  3. October 07, 2011 Agenda • Parking Lot # 19 – Review Bert’s power point presentation – Bert Bressers • Parking Lot # 19 & 24: discuss & clarify – Bert Bressers • Steve Sanders’ assignment from Sep 30 – Steve Sanders • Ed Davis’ suggestions for PFV white paper – Ed Davis • Future sub team meetings? Lets assess the need at the end BPS meeting. We have penciled in at least one more conference call.

  4. Parking Lot # 19 • Sub team could not come to a consensus except that we all recognize that this item has critical equity concerns. • Sub team members who also participate in BPS – will make a motion at BPS to continue discussion or not !!!

  5. Steve Sanders Examples • Questions and examples lead to the question whether more items should be included in the minimum requirements. Sub team recommends BPS to review the questions and examples to determine additional minimum requirement items.

  6. Ed Davis Comments in PFV Whitepaper • Sub team recommends BPS should review the Ed Davis comments in the PFV whitepaper.

More Related