1 / 16

South Korea

South Korea. Authoritarian Developmental (AD) Economic development Improving citizen capability (human development) Elite coalitions with local capitalists Coherent, effective bureaucracies. South korea - politics. 1950s: Land reform, key success

Download Presentation

South Korea

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.


Presentation Transcript

  1. South Korea • Authoritarian Developmental (AD) • Economic development • Improving citizen capability (human development) • Elite coalitions with local capitalists • Coherent, effective bureaucracies

  2. South korea - politics • 1950s: Land reform, key success • Military coup (1961) start of authoritarian, developmental regime • Military support base; alliance with capitalists • Industrialization, economic development • Unions repressed; anti-communist propaganda • Elections rigged • Military rule ended (1987) with pro-democracy protests/demonstrations by students, workers, and middle class (product of regime’s developmental policies)

  3. South korea - policies • Industrial policy • State-led industrialization • Control over banks and assistance to particular industries/firms • Did not lead to inefficient firms, theft of state funds • Social policy • Social spending aimed at advancing industrialization agenda (e.g., education) and legitimation

  4. South korea - institutions • Military (and Korean Central Intelligence Agency) – suppression, indoctrination • Economic institutions • Economic planning board; 5-year plans • Political parties (electoral machines; not programmatic) • Façade of democracy

  5. South korea – post authoritarianism • Democratic transition (1987) • Authoritarian developmental regime left mixed legacy • New political cleavages • Expansion of social spending • Strengthened democratic institutions

  6. Nigeria • Authoritarian Predatory (AP) • No economic/human development • Elites rely on narrow coalitions • Policies enrich themselves and narrow network of supporters • Bureaucracies ineffective • Widespread corruption and patronage

  7. Nigeria - politics • British colonial legacy • 4th Republic (long periods of military rule) • Characterized by patron-client relations • Ruler Big men military/business people/regional leaders  clients (typically of same ethnic group) • Patronage/spoils = oil revenues, budget, contracts • Divide and rule/repression

  8. Nigeria – policies/institutions • Policies • Leaders main goal to accumulate wealth, not promote human development • Economic development enriches elite • Institutions • Government bureaucracies staffed through patronage appointments

  9. Nigeria – post-predatory regime • Transition to electoral democracy (1999) • Obstacles to democratic consolidation, human development • Ethnic/religious cleavages • Patron-client politics • Weak institutions • Struggle over balance of power between central government and states • division of oil revenues • secular vs. shari’a law

  10. chile • Democratic Developmental (DD) • Commitment to improving capabilities of poor • Economic growth/development through market-oriented policies • Political parties build broad coalitions of support • Policies appeal to large groups of voters • Effective/professional (merit-based) bureaucracies

  11. Chile - politics • Post-Pinochet (1990) • Class cleavage is central • Leaders balance interests of classes, promote capabilities of poorest groups • Gradual reforms, consultation with opposition • Programmatic parties, business and labor federations • Highly competent civil service • Broad appeal among middle and working classes

  12. Chile – policies/institutions • Policies • Economic growth, education and health care for the poor • Strengthened democracy • High income inequality high; business class remains powerful • Institutions • Designed to ensure conservative control over legislature • Although legislature and judiciary increasingly independent relative to executive

  13. brazil • Democratic Fragmented (DF) • Coalitions dominated by large farmers, big business, parts of middle class • Political parities = electoral machines • patronage, populism, identity politics • Civil service (bureaucracy) mixed • Competent officials • Highly politicized agencies headed by patronage appointments

  14. Brazil - politics • Developments post-WWII • Rapid industrialization, increasing conflict between social classes • Military seized power (1964-1985) • State-led industrialization • Social class most important political cleavage • Fragmented political organizations

  15. Brazil - policies • Recent presidents’ (Cardoso, Lula) policies aimed at promoting capabilities of poorest citizens • Movement toward market system • Increased social spending aimed at promoting citizens’ capabilities (health care, education) and affirmative action • Challenges • Significant room for improvement in citizens’ capabilities

  16. Brazil - Institutions • Fragmented party system • Fragmented bureaucracy (ineffective, not autonomous) • Fragmented legislature • Federal system • Difficult for social democratic presidents to make significant strides in promoting Democratic Developmental regime

More Related