1 / 51

Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Interpreting biodiversity under diverse syndromes of recording behaviour. Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology. Extracting trends from biological recording data.

inezt
Download Presentation

Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Interpreting biodiversity under diverse syndromes of recording behaviour

  2. Nick Isaac Biological Records Centre Centre for Ecology & Hydrology Extracting trends from biological recording data

  3. Is biological recording fit for purpose? What is the purpose? What data are available? What are the problem issues? What tools might provide a solution?

  4. What is the purpose? • Describing species’ distributions • Detecting and attributing change over time • Identifying novelties Is biological recording fit for purpose? Mike Majerus FERA Wikipedia Commons GBNSS GBNSS

  5. Biological records data How do we interpret the gaps? NBN lists 35 data sources: • Individual records • Regional recording projects • Co-ordinated national surveys

  6. Published Atlases The primary tool for understanding UK biodiversity Authoritative summary of the current state of knowledge A snapshot of species’ distributions Perring, F H, & Walters, S M, eds 1962 Atlas of the British Flora. Thomas Nelson & Sons, London

  7. Published Atlases

  8. Stock & change in distribution Repeat atlases allow an assessment of change over time Prickly Lettuce (Lactuca serriola) has expanded northwest since 1970

  9. Repeat atlases: plants & birds, butterflies

  10. Biodiversity change using atlases ‘Square counts‘ on repeat atlases reveal which species are increasing vs decreasing Greatest losses occurred among butterflies, then birds Thomas, JA et al. (2004). Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science, 303(5665), 1879–81

  11. Where are we now? Atlases provide a rather static view of biodiversity The unstructured nature of the data makes square counting unreliable Increasing demand for quantitative information New methods for estimating trends are being developed

  12. Detecting and attributing change Trends in the distribution of 8 common ladybirds A majority show substantial negative response to arrival of Harlequin ladybird Similar patterns in GB & Belgium Roy, HE, Adriaens, T, Isaac, NJB et al. (2012). Invasive alien predator causes rapid declines of native European ladybirds. Diversity and Distributions, 18(7), 717–725 Mike Majerus

  13. Past, present and future Describing change Attributing change Biodiversity Indicators

  14. Talk outline Extracting trends from Biological records data • Problems & possible solutions Comparison of candidate methods • Simulations of recording behaviour • Which methods are useful for detecting trends? Applications: which species are declining? • Trends in Odonata 1970-2011 • Biodiversity Indicator

  15. Recording intensity varies among taxa

  16. Extracting trends from biological records

  17. Recording intensity has increased over time

  18. Telfer’s Change Index Telfer, MG, Preston, CD & Rothery, P (2002). A general method for measuring relative change in range size from biological atlas data. Biological Conservation, 107(1), 99–109 Compares two time-periods that differ in recording intensity &/or geographic coverage

  19. Ball’s Visit Rate model Ball, S, Morris, R, Rotheray, G, & Watt, K (2011). Atlas of the Hoverflies of Great Britain (Diptera, Syrphidae).

  20. Most lists are incomplete For most groups, ~50% of visits produce ‘incidental records’

  21. Lists lengths are not constant over time

  22. Mixed model

  23. Most records come from a few recorders Bryophytes: 18 Myriapods: 11 Moths: 102 Orthoptera: 39

  24. Spatial pattern of recording behaviour Orthoptera 1970-2011: top 4 recorders made 14% of all visits

  25. Hill’s Frescalo method Hill, MO (2011). Local frequency as a key to interpreting species occurrence data when recording effort is not known. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(1), 195–205. Frescalo estimates the recording intensity of each grid cell Red = under-recorded White = well-recorded

  26. Hill’s Frescalo method By estimating recording intensity, Frescalo calculates the number of species that ‘should’ be in each grid cell.

  27. Hill’s Frescalo method Hill, MO (2011). Local frequency as a key to interpreting species occurrence data when recording effort is not known. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(1), 195–205.

  28. Occupancy modelling: a panacea? van Strien, A, van Swaay, C, & Kéry, M (2011). Metapopulation dynamics in the butterfly Hipparchiasemele changed decades before occupancy declined in the Netherlands. Ecological Applications, 21(7), 2510–2520 Gateshead birders

  29. Talk outline Extracting trends from Biological records data • Problems & possible solutions Comparison of candidate methods • Simulations of recording behaviour • Which methods are useful for detecting trends? Applications: which species are declining? • Trends in Odonata 1970-2011 • Biodiversity Indicator

  30. How can we estimate trends? Estimate trends Raw data Recorder behaviour Simulations

  31. Simulations Aims: To compare the performance of different methods for estimating range change under realistic scenarios of recorder behaviour To discard methods that are inappropriate To derive rules of thumb for when other methods are appropriate

  32. Simulation overview 1000 sites (no spatial information) 1 focal species + 25 others Focal species occupies 50% sites Impose different patterns of recording Run for 10 years Estimate trends using different methods

  33. Simulation patterns of recording A: Control scenario: even recording • Equal probability of sites being visited B: Increasing recording intensity • Growth in number of visits C1: Incomplete recording (even) • A fixed proportion of Visits produce short lists C2: incomplete recording (increasing) • Proportion of short lists increases over time

  34. Type I Error Rates

  35. Type I Error Rates

  36. Type I Error Rates

  37. Type I Error Rates

  38. Type I Error Rates

  39. Type I Error Rates

  40. Type I Error Rates

  41. Type I Error Rates

  42. Power to detect a genuine decline

  43. Power to detect a genuine decline

  44. Simulations: Conclusions The simulation provides a framework for comparing methods under a range of recording scenarios The Mixed model method performs best so far (Frescalo & Occupancy results pending) In the best recording scenario, a decline of 30% was detected in 60% of simulated datasets

  45. Talk outline Extracting trends from Biological records data • Problems & possible solutions Comparison of candidate methods • Simulations of recording behaviour • Which methods are useful for detecting trends? Applications: which species are declining? • Trends in Odonata 1970-2011 • Biodiversity Indicator

  46. Odonata trends 1970-2011 Broad agreement between methods 14/32 species show significant increases under both methods 2/32 show significant decreases under both methods

  47. Odonata trends: winners Small red-eyed Damselfly (Erythromma viridulum) Scarce chaser (Libellula fulva) Emperor Dragonfly (Anax imperator) Wikipedia Commons

  48. Odonata trends: losers Variable damselfly (Coenagrion pulchellum) Blue-tailed Damselfly (Ischnura elegans) Common Blue Damselfly (Enallagma cyathigerum)

  49. Odonata Indicator

  50. Biological Recording for the 21st Century We have the tools to model biodiversity change using unstructured biological records This is only possible if records continue to be submitted to the database! We could be smarter about data collection We’re only just beginning to exploit the potential of biological recording data • Indicators, Red Listing, ecosystem service provision, targeting Agri-environment schemes

More Related