1 / 25

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS. CRITICAL TEXTUAL ANALYSIS, PART 2—MYTHIC ANALYSIS, SEMIOTICS & STRUCTURALISM. I.  Mythic/archetypal analysis. A. Myth involves a shared narrative or story 1.  Operates at an unconscious level 2.  Themes of myths are probably universal

indiya
Download Presentation

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS CRITICAL TEXTUAL ANALYSIS, PART 2—MYTHIC ANALYSIS, SEMIOTICS & STRUCTURALISM

  2. I.  Mythic/archetypal analysis • A. Myth involves a shared narrative or story • 1.  Operates at an unconscious level • 2.  Themes of myths are probably universal • 3.  Involves ultimate truths about life and death, fate and nature, God & humans • B.  Film in particular is receptive to myth • 1. Means of modern mythmaking • 2.  Film "speaks the same language" (picture/image) • 3.  Both are associated with dreams (S. Langer)

  3. Mythic/Archetypal Analysis, con’t. • C. Myths are symbolic representations highly valued by societies  • 1. Have common characteristics • 2. Powerful appeal, esp. to the unconscious • 3. Often have universal meanings, understood within a cultural context • D. Films use both universal & cultural archetypes, & universal & cultural myths • E. Types include character archetypes, story archetypes, and symbols

  4. II. Semiotic Analysis • A. The study of the social production of meaning from signs • 1. The science of signs which investigates “the nature of signs" & their social impact, so as to create laws (Griffin 98) • 2. Derived from linguistics (C. Pierce, F. Saussure, R. Barthes) • B. The study of signs (both verbal & non-verbal) & how they mean in a culture • 1. Central focus of semiotics--"the relationship between a sign and its meaning; and the way signs are combined into codes" (Fiske & Hartley 34)

  5. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 2. Looks at how signs function, "how meaning is generated & conveyed" (Berger 17) within "socially shared discourse" (Trenholm, 47) • 3. Looks at how the representation of signs & story structures establish meaning for particular groups, via discourse & specific texts • 4. Textual analysis articulates how this struggle between discourses is engaged. • a. Texts are how discursive knowledge is circulated, established, or suppressed

  6. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • b. A text is a signifying structure composed of signs & codes • 1) A message that has a physical existence beyond the sender & receiver, composed of representational codes • 2) Also a network of codes working at a number of levels, capable of producing a variety of meanings

  7. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 4. Codes--A code is a system of signs, governed by rules agreed upon (explicitly & implicitly) by a culture • a. Presentational codes use the body as a transmitter & indicate a subject's internal or social state • b. Representational codes are free standing signs isolated from the sender--abstract, generalizable, iconic or symbolic • c. Codes can be digital or analogic (particle/wave idea)

  8. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • d. There are behavioral codes (e.g. law, rules of football, etc.) & signifying codes • e. Signifying codes have these characteristics: • 1) convey meaning which is shared, conventional, & learned; and • 2) transmittable through appropriate media of communication • f. Language depends on verbal codes (primarily representational & digital) • g. Non-verbal codes may be digital or analogic, presentational or representational (more ambiguous)

  9. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 5. A sign is something which designates something other than itself. • a. Signs are arbitrary & learned through culture • b. Do not stand alone, but are part of a system of classification (or codes) • c. Have 3 characteristics: • 1) physical form • 2) reference to something other than itself • 3) recognizable as a sign • d. have 2 elements—signified & signifier

  10. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 6. Types of signs (Pierce): • a. Icon--signifies through a marked physical or perceptual resemblance between signifier and signified • b. Index--signifies through a connection to its object • 1) usually causal (but can also be existential); e.g. smoke/fire, spots/measles, footprint/person, snarl/anger • 2) Tend to operate metonymically (e.g. a cowboy hat for the whole cowboy)

  11. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • c. Symbols--signifies through conventions or rules; arbitrary, conventional signs which stand for something other than themselves • 1) Have to learn the meanings of symbols • 2) All words are symbolic; other images may be a mixture of types • 3) Tend to be metaphoric or abstract (e.g. a gold coin symbolizes wealth) • 4) Symbols can be archetypal or stereotypical, as well as cultural or individual

  12. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 7. Orders of signification (Barthes): • a. Denotation, simple • 1) simple or literal relationship of a sign to its referent • 2) assumed to be "objective" & "value-free” • b. Connotative, 2nd order--meaning extended to the realm of values, associative, expressive, attitudinal, evaluative meaning • c. Ideological, 3rd order--the connotations & myths of a culture are manifest signs of its ideology (Fiske & Hartley)

  13. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • 8. Signs can also be metaphoric or metonymic • a. Metaphors—signs that stand for something else than original; creates images & myths • b. Metonymy--when part of a sign stands for the whole, e.g. a city street for the city, 2 or 3 pickets for an union trade strike, a soldier for Army etc. • 9. Can analyze signs as part of a paradigm, or a set of units which combine with others • a. Meaning is determined by how units (syntagms) interact with others (e.g. a sentence forms paragraphs)

  14. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • b. Paradigmatic analysis focuses on an associative metaphoric code • 1) Examine vertical sets of units representing latent meaning • 2) Read synchronically or “down the chart” • 3) “Read against the grain," looking for patterns of opposition or themes, etc.

  15. Semiotic Analysis, con’t. • c. Syntagmatic analysis looks at linear patterns (such as syntax or the grammatical structure) • 1) Examine horizontal, systematic sets of units linked to each other, representing manifest meaning • 2) Read diachronically or “across the chart” • 3) Often chronological (e.g. the structure of fairy tales & narratives) • 4) Formulaic & logical in sequence

  16. III. Structuralism • A. Structuralism & post-structuralism are complex theoretical positions • 1. In general, structuralism dedicated to the systematic elaboration of rules • 2. Also looks at the constraints on such rules • 3. Looks at systems, relations,& forms (the "structures") that make meaning possible in any cultural activity or artifact • B. Not an interpretative approach to meaning--does not seek to reveal hidden or intrinsic meaning in a text • C. Instead texts reveal meanings through their "structures" or relationships within a system of signs

  17. Structuralism, con’t. • D. One way of analyzing texts is to examine binary oppositions • 1. How meanings are generated out of two-term systems • 2. Originally developed from anthropological & literary analysis of myth (e.g. VladamirPropp'sMorphology of the Folktale & Claude Levi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology) • 3. Binaries arise out of culture, out of the nature of language itself & the products of our signifying systems (e.g. images)

  18. Structuralism, con’t. • 4. Binaries structure our perceptions of the natural & social world in an orderly & meaningful way • 5. Meaning is generated by opposition • a. Signs mean most in terms of what they are not; always imply their opposites • b. Most extreme, yet basic form of difference is binary--only two signs, e.g. LAND:SEA • 1) Mutually exclusive • 2) Yet together form a complete system--the earth's surface • 3) Similar binaries: US:THEM, GOOD:BAD, LIGHT:DARK, MEN:WOMEN, etc.

  19. Structuralism, con’t. • c. Binary logic produces ambiguities • 1) Repressed but often emerge as a sub-text (e.g. between LAND & SEA is the BEACH--a territory not quite land or sea) • 2) Binary logic finds this "scandalous“ • 3) Often a site of taboo in a culture • a) Activities or states that don’t fit the binary system subjected to repression or ritual • b) This taboo territory is a liminal, or transitional, state--a state out of time, on the edge of experience • c) In many cultures this is a sacred time

  20. Structuralism, con’t. • d. Transitional (liminal) states require a rite-of-passage from one state to another, e.g. passage between CHILD:ADULT (youth), or between SINGLE:MARRIED (engaged) • e. Ambiguities also resolved through a type of THESIS:ANTITHESIS:SYNTHESIS process • 1) Often occurs through myth (see Levi-Strauss) • 2) Ambiguous term mediates between the oppositional poles)

  21. Structuralism, con’t. • f. Binary oppositions are structurally related • 1) Function to order meanings • 2) Lead to transformations of one underlying binary running through a story structure, e.g. MALE:FEMALE into terms like PUBLIC:PRIVATE, NATURE:CULTURE; etc. • 3) Each binary has an overlap representing the overlap the taboo, ambiguous category • 4) Although repressed, the ambiguous category can be transformed as well • 5) Each of the terms on one side is invested with the qualities of the others on that side

  22. Structuralism, con’t. • g. Thus binaries are highly ideological • 1) Nothing natural about them • 2) The logic of binaries is hard to escape (e.g. GOOD:EVIL often gets linked to US:THEM) • 3) The ideological nature of binaries is further enhanced because positive & negative values attach themselves to opposed terms • 4) For example, in the current abortion debate, the terms move as follows: • GOOD is to EVIL as LIFE is to DEATH is to ABORTION ACTIVISTS vs. ABORTION DOCTORS • 5) This frames the debate in absolute moral terms

  23. Structuralism, con’t. • E. Another approach is deconstruction of texts • 1. Deconstruction is a mode of literary analysis • a. Derived from Jacques Derrida • b. Argues philosophical assumptions underlying writing do not guarantee their meaning • c. On the contrary, the discourses systematically undermine the assumptions • 2. The method takes nothing for granted • 3. Challenges belief that language is merely referential--naming an already existing reality

  24. Structuralism, con’t. • 4. Deconstruction dedicated to teasing out the repressed, marginalized & absent in the chosen discourse • 5. This is not the same as looking for a hidden meaning--the meaning is manifest, extrinsic, it just needs to be "deconstructed“ • 6. Deconstruction a method associated with post-structuralism

  25. Structuralism, con’t. • 7. Post-structuralism combines structuralist ideas with psychoanalytic theory (esp. looking at the role of pleasure in producing & regulating meanings) • a. Also concerned with external structures (beyond the text), such as class, gender, & ethnicity, which make meaning possible • b. Original structuralism more concerned with internal textual structures • c. A shift in focus from text to reader (thus sometimes also linked to reader-response theory)

More Related