2012 Data Coach Training – High SchoolDay 1 Dr. Yuwadee WongbundhitCurriculum and Instruction
Data Coach Training Goal To enable data coaches to be effective data users that can assist administrators and teachers to use data to improve teaching and learning.
Expectation Data Coach will:
Data Rich….Analysis Poor! It would be very easy to get “analysis paralysis” by spending time pulling data together but not spending time using the data.
District-wide Instructional Focus The District’s Pacing Guides and Instructional Focus Calendars are aligned with the timing and content of the District Interim Assessment, working together to provide both guidelines for instruction and tools for monitoring student progress throughout the year.
Continuous Instructional Improvement System Create meaningful data for administrators, coaches, and teachers….
DATA/COM Five Years Trend Safe Harbor Est. Year-at-Glance Benchmark Report 2012 SIP Goals NGSSS and EOC Monitoring Tool Interim Assessment by subgroup Baseline Fall Interim Winter Interim
NGSSS Benchmarks Monitoring Tools Link to School Performance Report
Move or Copy Worksheet (Page 2) Right click on worksheet tab Select “Move or Copy Under To Book: Select the designated file Select (Move to End) Select Create a copy Click OK
Overview of FCAT 2.0 Scores Link to Understanding FCAT 2.0 Reports, Spring 2011
2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores Equivalent Scale Score(100 - 500) Equivalent Achievement Level(1 to 5) Equivalent DSS(86 to 3008) Raw Score Reading Content Scores V: Vocabulary RA: Reading Application LA: Literary Analysis IR: Informational Text/Research Process
Scale Score vs. Developmental Scale Score G10 G4 G3 100 100 100 500 500 500 Scale Score 86 Developmental Scale Scores 3008 Grade 3 Grade 10
2011 FCAT 2.0 Scores 2007 NGSSS 1996 SSS Base scale of FCAT Base scale of FCAT 2.0 New FCAT 2.0 Scale – 2012: In January 2012, the new achievement-level cut scores for the FCAT 2.0 will be created for the FCAT 2.0 in reading (G3-10) and mathematics (G3-8). FCAT 1999 FCAT 2001 FCAT 2.0 2012 FCAT 2002 FCAT 2.0 Equivalent Scores FCAT 2.0 2011 FCAT 2010
Equipercentile Linking Example • The black and green lines represent scores on two different assessments • The lines show how the raw score relates to the percentile rank • A “black” score of 260 and a “green” score of 340 are both at the 50th percentile rank and are “equivalent”
2011 FCAT 2.0 Possible Points Reading Reporting Category Content Focus
2011 FCAT 2.0 Possible Points, Grades 3-5 Mathematics Reporting Category
2011 FCAT 2.0 Possible Points, Grades 6-8 Mathematics Reporting Category
2011 Algebra 1 EOC Scores Raw Score Algebra Content Scores EOC-Scale Scores(20 to 80) Population Thirds(low, middle, upper)
2011 Algebra EOC Scale Distribution - Statewide Upper Third (EOC SS >54) State: 35% MDCPS: 28% Lower Third (EOC SS < 46) State: 32% MDCPS: 40% • 210,004 Students tested • Average Scale Score is 49.43; • Average Raw Score is 21 out of 52(41% Correct)
Statewide Comparison Points Earned by Content Area Test Form EOC-Scale Score 1 2 3
Algebra 1 EOC Scores(Full Animation) Raw Score Algebra Content Scores EOC-Scale Scores(20 to 80) Achievement Level(1 to 5)
2012 Algebra 1 EOC Scores Raw Score Algebra Content Scores EOC-Scale Scores(20 to 80) Achievement Level(1 to 5)
T Scores Average Score
2011 District Algebra EOC Results of % of Students at Statewide Comparison by Thirds * Does not include small numbers of students in Grade 6 and Adult Education Programs.
Baseline Assessment Analysis http://curriculum.dadeschools.net/schoolperformancereports.asp