1 / 9

Case Study on M&E of Previous HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs in Japanese ODA Infrastructure Project

Case Study on M&E of Previous HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs in Japanese ODA Infrastructure Project. 30 April, 2008 JBIC Sector Strategy Development Department. Case 1:“Project in South-East Asia”. Duration of Program: 2 years (Feb 2006 to Feb 2008)

igor-jacobson
Download Presentation

Case Study on M&E of Previous HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs in Japanese ODA Infrastructure Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Case Study on M&E of Previous HIV/AIDS Prevention Programs in Japanese ODA Infrastructure Project 30 April, 2008 JBIC Sector Strategy Development Department

  2. Case 1:“Project in South-East Asia” • Duration of Program: 2 years (Feb 2006 to Feb 2008) • Contract out to an International NGO Size of the HIV/AIDS program • Respondents: local workers, community population, sex workers, etc.

  3. (A) Activities • Provision of health knowledge and counseling training to health workers at Contractors and Health Clinics • conducting surveys and provision of information • coordination with contractors and local communities • provision of Condoms and training of its usage

  4. (B) Mid-term Report (survey; about 240 workers and officers) • 80% of the respondents reported having improved knowledge of HIV/AIDS (most respondents could give correct answers to HIV related questions and cite at least one HIV transmission route) • 10,000 condoms were distributed every month, total of 85,000 condoms distributed. • 70 % of those who had sex in previous month could have access to condoms. • Condom usage was much higher than the baseline survey (baseline=26%, mid-term survey=50%)

  5. Recommendation • Ensure sufficient time for implementation • Improve output related indicators to match with available resource (human resources, time, etc) • Conduct training for newly recruited health workers, places for counseling, etc • Prepare more activities in communities, more time, and more materials for training, etc. • Encourage more collaboration with VCT centers and the project, etc

  6. Case 2:“Project in South-East Asia” Duration of Program: 1.5 years (Phase1; Nov 2001 to Mar 2002) (Phase 2; Apr 2002 to Mar 2003) Provided by a grant study scheme (SAPI) of JBIC Respondents: local workers, community population, sex workers, etc

  7. Phase 1 • Collection and Analysis of information in the following: • existing situation of HIV/AIDS and STI • existing system for HIVAIDS and STI • past and present programs • behavior pattern and knowledge of HIV & STIs of targeted groups (2) Output of Phase 1 • Identifying Potential Approaches • Proposing Implementation Plan

  8. Phase 2 • Activities (1)Advocacy (2)Peer Education and Life Skills for CWR (3)Social Marketing of Condoms (B) Outputs (1)Advocacy: Reaching up to 13,000 people (2)Peer Education: informal peer education information provision to about 1,000 (3)Social Marketing: Condom Sales booth increased from 55 up to 142: Average of condoms per month sold from 10,650 to 67,500:

  9. Issues to be tackled • Create Monitoring and Evaluation indicators besides “output” basis • Create Monitoring and Evaluation indicators besides “awareness” or “attitude” of targeted groups • More effective and efficient ways to collect evaluations indicators (due to limited human resources and period of time) • Possible economic analysis of HIV/AIDS interventions • Reflect good practices and/or lessons learned into future programs-systematic ways to provide and disseminate feedback

More Related