1 / 16

MIS in Earthquake Response

MIS in Earthquake Response. ‘ Dream Team ’ Dan Xie (4172339) Ruiting Cai (4153120) Jessica Seddon (4174087) Jianan Zhang(4152409) Layla Delgosha (4166354) Pei Zhu(4156370) Yun Yang(4153964). Agenda. Introduction to global earthquakes and their consequences

hye
Download Presentation

MIS in Earthquake Response

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MIS in Earthquake Response ‘Dream Team’ Dan Xie(4172339) RuitingCai(4153120) Jessica Seddon(4174087) Jianan Zhang(4152409) LaylaDelgosha(4166354) Pei Zhu(4156370) Yun Yang(4153964)

  2. Agenda • Introduction to global earthquakes and their consequences • Statistics about earthquake degree and death rates • Critical evaluation of the role of MIS in disaster response • Comparing MIS in developed and developing countries (Japan's system vs. SAHANA) • Evaluation

  3. Introduction Source: OFDA

  4. Earthquake degree and death rates

  5. The Standard Characteristics of MIS in Earthquakes • A system that records, collects, keeps, retrieves and analyses inputs and alters the reports and required earthquake information (Sima,2009) • Once the earthquake is identified, the system will estimate the damage and loss • It contains earthquake Early Warning System (EEW) and post recovery system

  6. SWOT Analysis of Earthquake MIS Threats Opportunities Strengths Weaknesses • Preparing for disasters in the future • Government support/Collaboration • New technology and innovation • Unpredictability • Software failure (e.g. virus) • Security of hardware • Information reliability • User involvement (information gap) • Budget constraints • Not easy to change Risk reducing Forecast (before) Rapid response Reconstruct (after)

  7. MIS in Developed Countries • Background of Japan • Japan is the third largest economy in the world but also one of the most earthquake-prone countries. • Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) uses the “PHOENIX” post recovery system:

  8. Introduced in the late 1950’s • Localised systems in each town to collect information Phoenix System Source from: Disaster Prevention and Management (2009)

  9. MIS in Developing Countries • Lack of resources to fund MIS • Prior to SAHANA – no globally accepted standard • Response to the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake (2004) • Tsunami Evaluation Commission: “significant effort and funding should be dedicated to organizing open source, easily shareable software and training tools to prepare for all stages of disaster response” • Open Source Software – can be improved and distributed at no cost (not built on proprietary of licensed software platforms and not owned by any single entity)

  10. More on SAHANA • SAHANA – Low cost, FOSS approach, adaptability • Awards2006 – Highest award in the Open Source Industry (Free Software Foundation)Award for Social Benefit (beat Project Gutenburg & Wikipedia) • Drawback – lack of a helpline

  11. Evaluation • PHOENIX Vs. SAHANA • CSF for MIS in earthquake • Top management support • Planned channels for information flows • User involvement and training • Coordination and Cooperation within each department

  12. References • Ajami, S. & Fattahi, M. (2009) ‘The role of earthquake information management systems (EIMSs) in reducing destruction: A comparative study of Japan, Turkey and Iran’, Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(2), pp.150 – 161 • Careem et al. (2006) ‘Sahana, Overview of a Disaster Management System’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Automation. Available at: ftp://ftp.umiacs.umd.edu/pub/louiqa/PUB06/Sahana6.pdf • Currion et al. (2007) ‘Open Source Software for Disaster Management’, Communications of the ACM, 50(3), pp. 61-65 • Daniell, J. E. (2011) ‘Open Source Procedure for Assessment of Loss using Global Earthquake Modelling software (OPAL)’, Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Science. Available at: http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/11/1885/2011/nhess-11-1885-2011.pdf • Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (2012). Available at: http://www.gfdrr.org/gfdrr/ • International Free and Open Source Solutions Foundation (2012). Available at: http://ifossf.org/ • Leebmann, J. & KyaloKiema, J. B, (n.d) ‘Knowledge Representation In Technical Information Systems For Earthquake Loss Mitigation’. Available at: http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/RMP/july2000/Papers/leebmann.pdf • Phoenix Geographics Ltd (1996) ‘Earthquake Prediction in Future’, The Phoenix, 6, pp. 1-8 • Seeger, M. W., Sellnow, T. L., & Ulmer, R. R. (2003). Communication, organization and crisis. West port, CT: Quoru • Society for Research and Initiatives for Sustainable Technologies and Institutions (2012). Available at: http://www.sristi.org/cms/ • Reynolds, B. & Seeger, M. (2005) ‘Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication as an Integrative Model’, Journal of Health Communication, 10, pp. 43-55 • Woodworth, B. (n.d) ‘The SAHANA Disaster Management System: A contribution by IBM’. Available at: http://www.bizforum.org/whitepapers/ibm-10.htm • Xu et al (2009). ‘Coseismic reverse- and oblique-slip surface faulting generated by the 2008 Mw 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake, China’, The Geological Society of America, 37 (6), pp. 515-518 • Yamada et al (2004). ‘Earthquake Disaster Prevention Information System Based on Risk Adaptive Regional Management Information System Concept’ 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Available at: http://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/13_709.pdf

  13. The system takes only two minutes to produce a report after the earthquake has occurred • It can forecast a tsunami around three minutes in advance

More Related