100 likes | 177 Views
This summary presents survey responses on stakeholder perceptions and suggestions for Regional IPM Centers, emphasizing the need for organic pest management, invasive species control, outreach, and evaluation. Recommendations include greater emphasis on environmental impacts and improved marketing strategies.
E N D
Regional IPM Centers SurveyA Summary Adapted from a presentation by Carol Pilcher Department of Entomology Iowa State University
Response Rate • 135 individuals • 97 individuals responded to survey • 71.8% response rate
National Level Analyses Table 1. Frequencies of Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives
National Level AnalysesMeans and Standard Deviations of Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
Table 2. Frequencies of Northeastern Region Stakeholder Response to Centers’ Objectives
Means and Standard Deviations of Stakeholder Response (by Region) to Centers’ Objectives 1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree
Are there any activities, programs, approaches or practices that the Regional IPM Centers should consider implementing?
Areas of Focus (integrate these areas into the Center Programs) • Organic pest management into program • Non-agricultural issues • Invasive species • Conference/Workshop • One major regional conference with major theme • Cross Regional Efforts • Work on issues that bridge regional boundaries • Demonstration Projects • Greater use of “demonstration” projects
Evaluation/Measuring Impacts • Greater emphasis on environmental, health and economic impacts • Performance measures • Leadership • Center take more active approach to driving IPM policy and adoption • Center take lead role in national IPM decision support system • Outreach • Work closely to engage more stakeholders
Outreach/Marketing • IPM Centers need to do a better job of marketing themselves as a good source of IPM information • Brief reports to concisely summarize goals of program, research results of grant funding, progress towards goals, etc. • Support State Contact/State Coordinator • Fully fund one position per state to conduct activities of state contact (crop profiles, PMSP activities, etc.)