1 / 44

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 7 Lecture 31. Similitude Analysis: Full & Partial. Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS. “Inspectional Analysis”– Becker (1976)

Download Presentation

Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Advanced Transport Phenomena Module 7 Lecture 31 Similitude Analysis: Full & Partial Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras

  2. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • “Inspectional Analysis”– Becker (1976) • Based on governing constitutive equations, conservation principles, initial/ boundary conditions • Similitude conditions extracted without actually solving resulting set of dimensionless equations

  3. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • More powerful than dimensional analysis • Removes guesswork/ intuition regarding relevant variables • Demonstrates physical significance of each dimensionless group • Suggests when certain groups will be irrelevant based on competing effects • Enables a significant reduction in # of relevant dimensionless groups • Suggests existence & use of analogies

  4. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Steady heat flow from isothermal horizontal cylinder of length L, in Newtonian fluid in natural convective flow induced by body force field g • Dimensional interrelation:

  5. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS total rate of heat loss per unit axial length of cylinder pL proportional to cylinder surface area per unit axial length bT  thermal expansion coefficient of fluid

  6. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • By dimensional analysis (p-theorem), “only” 6 independent dimensionless groups:

  7. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • By similitude analysis, only 2 (Pr, Rah):

  8. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Nondimensionalizing equations & bc’s for velocity & temperature fields:

  9. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Solutions of the PDE-system, v* and T*:

  10. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Dimensionless groups have physical significance, e.g.: Grh measure of relative magnitudes of buoyancy and viscous forces

  11. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Mass-transfer analog of heat-transfer problem: • Example: slowly subliming (or dissolving) solid cylinder of same shape & orientation, with solute mass fraction wA,w = constant (<< 1) and wA,∞(also << 1) specified • Local buoyancy force/ mass = gbw(wA-wA,∞)

  12. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • Composition variable • Satisfies: (neglecting homogeneous chemical reaction & assuming local validity of Fick’s law for dilute species A diffusion through Newtonian fluid)

  13. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • v* satisfies nonlinear PDE: • Transport property (diffusivity) ratio: • Grashof number for mass transport:

  14. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Example: Convective heat flow • By inspection & comparison: • Functions on RHS are same for mass & heat transfer • Can be obtained by heat- or mass-transfer experiments, whichever is more convenient • Dimensional analysis could not have led to this prediction & conclusion

  15. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS Correlation of perimeter-averaged “natural convection” heat transfer from/to a horizontal circular cylinder in a Newtonian fluid (adapted from McAdams (1954))

  16. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Simplest problem involving transport by convection & diffusion, along with simultaneous homogeneous chemical reaction: prediction of steady propagation of the “wave” of chemical reaction observed subsequent to local ignition in an initially premixed, quiescent, nonturbulent gas • Heat & reaction intermediaries diffusing from initial zone of intense chemical reaction prepare adjacent layer of gas, which prepares next layer, etc.

  17. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Su steady propagation speed relative to unburned gas • Simple to measure • Not trivial to interpret • Transport laws can be approximated • But, combustion reactions occur via a complex network • Problem lends itself to SA

  18. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Assumptions: • Single, stoichiometric, irreversible chemical reaction • Simple “gradient” diffusion • Equality of effective diffusivities (neff = aeff =Di,eff) • Constant heat capacity (w.r.t. temperature & mixture composition) • Deflagration waves propagate slowly enough to neglect relative change of pressure across them, (pu – pb)/pu

  19. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Stoichiometric fuel + oxidizer vapor reaction assumed to occur at local rate: • n ≡ nO + nFoverall reaction order • Generalization of bimolecular (n = 2) form • necessary to describe overall effect to many elementary steps of different reaction orders

  20. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Normalized temperature variable • Characteristic length: a/Su • a mixture thermal diffusivity • Dimensionless distance variable

  21. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • maximum reaction rate, occurs at • Normalized reaction rate function: • Problem now reduces to finding eigen-value, Y, corresponding to solution of BVP:

  22. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS where

  23. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • where

  24. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Therefore, at most: • Or flame speed must be given by: • fct evaluated by numerical or analytical methods

  25. SIMILITUDE ANALYSIS • Laminar Flame Speed: • Above similitude result contains pressure-dependence of Su • since a ̴p-1, ̴pn, ru̴p+1 • Effective overall reaction order ~

  26. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Include many additional parameters • Many reference quantities, e.g., for a combustor:

  27. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Can true similarity ever be achieved except in the trivial case of Lp = Lm? • Alternative: allow “approximate similarity”, or “partial modeling”

  28. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: Aircraft gas turbine GT combustor (schematic)

  29. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Complex geometry • Liquid fuel introduced into enclosure as a spray • Each spray characterized by a spray angle, spray momentum flux, droplet size distribution, etc. • Two-phase effects

  30. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Simpler limiting case: fuel droplets sufficiently small so that their penetration is small • Vaporization rapid enough to not limit overall chemical heat release rate

  31. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Performance criterion: combustion efficiency • Similarity criteria:

  32. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Additional factors:

  33. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • If combustion efficiency hcomb exhibits functional dependencies: • We can conclude: hm= hp • if each nondimensional parameter is same for model & prototype

  34. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • If scale model is run with same fuel, at same inlet temperature (Tu) & same mixture ratio (F) as prototype, nondimensional parameters will be same if:

  35. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Is there a combination of model pressure, velocity & scale (pm, Um, Lm) such that remaining similarity conditions can be met? • Answer requires specification of p, U, L-dependence of each parameter

  36. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: -for a perfect gas, Re-equivalence implies: -Ma-equivalence implies:

  37. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Therefore, model pressure • This conflicts with Dam-equivalence! • For example, in case of a simple nth-order homogeneous fuel-consumption reaction: ~ ~

  38. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Since tflow L/Uu, Dam-equivalence requires: • In light of Ma-equivalence requirement: • Differs from earlier expression for pm when n≠ 2

  39. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Thus, even in simple combustor applications, strict scale-model similarity is unattainable • hcomb is much more sensitive to Dam than to Re • Especially at high (fully turbulent) Re • Hence, for sufficiently large Re, Re-dependence of hcomb can be neglected • “approximate similitude”

  40. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: Dependence of GT combustor efficiency on Re at constant (inverse) Damkohler Number (schematic, adapted from S. Way (1956))

  41. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Under “approximate similitude”, scale-model combustor tests should be run with: • and • Apparent reaction order, n: 1.3-1.6 (depending on fuel)

  42. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: • Efficiency & stability data on combustors should appr correlate with a parameter proportional to Dam (or to Dam-1): • Examples: efficiency, stability-limits

  43. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: Correlation for the GT combustor efficiency vs parameter proportional to (inverse) Damkohler number (adapted from S. Way (1956))

  44. PARTIAL MODELING OF CHEMICALLY REACTING SYSTEMS • Gas-Turbine Combustor Efficiency: Correlation of the GT combustor stability limits vs parameter proportional to (inverse) Damkohler number (after D.Stewart (1956))

More Related