1 / 9

Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 )

Panorama High School. Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ). Problem Solving Process Using RTI to improve Basic English Learners to Proficient January 10, 2012. ELL Coordinator: Flaminio Zarate. RtI 2 English Learner Pool (583). Academic. Behavior.

hoshi
Download Presentation

Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 )

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panorama High School Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI2) Problem Solving Process Using RTI to improve Basic English Learners to Proficient January 10, 2012 ELL Coordinator: Flaminio Zarate

  2. RtI2 English Learner Pool (583) Academic Behavior Intensive (471 Students) LEP students FBB and BB Tier 3 Strategic Target Int. (102 students) Needing Proficiency on CST (BASIC) Tier 2 Core Students who are currently LEP and ELA Proficient (10) Tier 1

  3. RtI2Problem Solving Process Problem Identification Problem Analysis Evaluation Intervention Design and Implementation

  4. Problem Identification Step 1: Problem Identification • 1.7% (10 students) of LEP students are proficient on ELA section of CST’s • Proficiency for total school must be >33 %. Currently we are at 29.9% • EL goal is to increase LEP proficiency from 1.7% to 15% (Total of 88 students) Problem Identification

  5. ProblemAnalysis Step 2: Problem Analysis • Many EL (PRP) students do not have basic foundations in language skills to attain proficiency • Students need to practice test taking strategies • EL (PRP) students need to score “P”AT 350 or above to increase total Proficiency pool of the school • Students need to be informed and motivated 3 Problem Analysis

  6. ProblemAnalysis Step 2: Problem Analysis (Cont’d) • If all 102 students were to attain proficiency we would achieve a 19.4% proficiency • To move from 1.7% proficiency to 15% we would need to move 78 students from Basic to Proficient and maintain the 10 students that are currently proficient • 87% of the 102 targeted clustered group of students would have to be moved from Basic to Proficient 3 Problem Analysis

  7. InterventionDesignandImplementation Step 3: Intervention Design and Implementation • Students are currently clustered for targeted intervention with various English teachers • Counseling with parents and student to motivate and inform of student progress • Put in Place CST practice every Tuesday during Class targeting specific CST questions 3 Intervention Design and Implementation

  8. InterventionDesignandImplementation Step 3: Intervention Design and Implementation (Cont’d) • Boot camp and Incentives for Students • Individual informative counseling with student on current CST scores • EL Coordinator will meet with Proficiency Cohort weekly to discuss student progress on practice CST released questions, and Periodic Assessments as benchmarks 3 Intervention Design and Implementation

  9. Evaluation Step 4: Evaluation • Periodic Assessments • Monitor if practice is being accomplished along with released CST questions • Improvement of number of correct answers by students on the CST released questions • CST scores Evaluation

More Related