1 / 7

Ian Poree

Breaking the Cycle?. ?We will use the process of competition to drive up the quality and standards of Community Payback." . Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders. Why compete Community Payback services now?. To deliver government policy which is:To i

hosea
Download Presentation

Ian Poree

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Ian Poree Unpaid Work/Community Payback National Framework Mini-Competition Programme The Commissioning Approach

    2. Breaking the Cycle… “We will use the process of competition to drive up the quality and standards of Community Payback.”

    3. Why compete Community Payback services now? To deliver government policy which is: To improve services through the use of competition Deliver demonstrable public value Encourage innovation in service design Develop the market diversity and increase provider base CP mini competition 3 YT Comments: To deliver government policy which is; To improve services through the use of competition Encourage innovation in service design from existing and new market entrants Deliver demonstrable public value To use delivery structures which reflect a range of civic society providers Clare/Ben/Ian P comments Need to include extract from the Green paper on use of competition to determine value Remove second bullet under To save money YT Comments: To deliver government policy which is; To improve services through the use of competition Encourage innovation in service design from existing and new market entrants Deliver demonstrable public value To use delivery structures which reflect a range of civic society providers Clare/Ben/Ian P comments Need to include extract from the Green paper on use of competition to determine value Remove second bullet under To save money

    4. Key elements of the commissioning strategy A National Strategy, determined in accordance with Government Policy for Local Delivery: Reflects new government priorities NOMS is the commissioner (scale and expertise) Provides assurance around price and quality Opportunity to demonstrate local innovation CP mini competition 4 THE COMMISSIONING STRATEGY Commissioned nationally delivered locally NOMS as commissioner, Trusts as providers. Economies of scale in running competitions Lots determined nationally Stress how we think it will work at local level It is different to the previous Trust by Trust BV approach Seeking to maximise savings Ł8 - Ł25m pa out of Ł71m direct and Ł39m indirect costs) Is this based on agreed costing info – not sure about putting this amount of detail up A National Strategy, determined in accordance with Government Policy for Local Delivery NOMS is the commissioner (scale and expertise) MOJ provides the procurement and legal support 38 Identified providers Reflects new government priorities Will provide assurance around price and quality An opportunity to demonstrate even more local innovation Clare/Ben/Ian Take out reference to nationally delivered. Say Commissioning co-ordinated to ensure local delivery, criteria determined through competition Remove Lots determined nationally Take out savings range. Include only direct and indirect cost amounts THE COMMISSIONING STRATEGY Commissioned nationally delivered locally NOMS as commissioner, Trusts as providers. Economies of scale in running competitions Lots determined nationally Stress how we think it will work at local level It is different to the previous Trust by Trust BV approach Seeking to maximise savings Ł8 - Ł25m pa out of Ł71m direct and Ł39m indirect costs) Is this based on agreed costing info – not sure about putting this amount of detail up A National Strategy, determined in accordance with Government Policy for Local Delivery NOMS is the commissioner (scale and expertise) MOJ provides the procurement and legal support 38 Identified providers Reflects new government priorities Will provide assurance around price and quality An opportunity to demonstrate even more local innovation Clare/Ben/Ian Take out reference to nationally delivered. Say Commissioning co-ordinated to ensure local delivery, criteria determined through competition Remove Lots determined nationally Take out savings range. Include only direct and indirect cost amounts

    5. Lots Rationale Maintain existing probation trust boundaries Larger lots to maximise economies of scale Balanced lots in terms of volume Requires strong local delivery links CP mini competition 5

    6. Clare/Ben/Ian Need to hold the line on the Lot boundaries. Can we include the table with the volumes for each Lot Clare/Ben/Ian Need to hold the line on the Lot boundaries. Can we include the table with the volumes for each Lot

    7. Competition Structure 6 lots, delivered through a number of competitions London as first lot A national gateway for Probation Trusts Range of prime and sub-prime options for Trusts & framework providers Aim is to encourage strong bids from all sectors CP mini competition 7 Clare/Ben/Ian 6 Lots up to 3 competitions stress lot number does not indicate order of mini comps London first Lot. (don’t mention batches) A national gateway for Probation Trusts (take out rest of bullet point) Clare/Ben/Ian 6 Lots up to 3 competitions stress lot number does not indicate order of mini comps London first Lot. (don’t mention batches) A national gateway for Probation Trusts (take out rest of bullet point)

    8. Indicative Procurement Sequence

More Related