1 / 16

Key Strategies for Successful Mineral Exploration

This article explores simple observations and their significant implications for successful mineral exploration, focusing on the importance of finding giant deposits, the distribution of deposits within a district, the use of new concepts and technology, and the track record of major companies versus juniors. It also highlights the rising cost of finding big deposits and the need for innovative approaches.

heric
Download Presentation

Key Strategies for Successful Mineral Exploration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EXPLORATION STRATEGIES :Simple Observations, Significant ImplicationsJohn R ParryExecutive General Manager - Exploration WMC Resources Ltd SMEDG – AIG Symposium : Sydney : April 27, 2001

  2. OBSERVATION 1 :Most of the mineral industry's wealth is captured by a handful of giant deposits Cumulative NPV @ 8% discount rate BASE METALS 2/3rds of wealth comes from 10% of all projects 129 Deposits with total value of US$32Billion in 1994 dollars Base Metal Mines discovered in Canada & Australia to 1988 Source : Derived from Mackenzie 1995

  3. IMPLICATIONS :Giant Deposits For Junior Companies • Small deposits can give good IRRs, but NPV will be small • Finding a giant deposit can be a “Company-Maker”(ie as the Carlin District was for Barrick and Newmont) • Need to focus on finding giant deposits, as only these : • Are of the right scale to make a significant impacton the company’s business • Provide a sufficiently large return to pay for ongoing exploration costs For Major Companies

  4. OBSERVATION 2 :Within a district, most of the endowment is tied up in handful of deposits Gold Endowment (koz) at St Ives Junction Victory Argo Revenge Leviathan 35 Deposits8.1 moz Au Endowment = Current Reserves + Cumulative Production Source : WMC Dec 1999

  5. OBSERVATION 3 :In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first Gold Discoveries at Norseman (koz) Royal1940 koz Mararoa 1160 koz Crown1080 koz Bullen270 koz OK180 koz Harlequin270 koz Deposit Size discovered Year of Startup Source : WMC Dec 1998

  6. OBSERVATION 3 :In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first … and for the least explorn $ Gold Discoveries at Norseman (koz) Yr 2000 A$m Deposit Size discovered Exploration Expenditures Year of Startup Source : WMC Dec 1998 Note : Excludes “Extensional” exploration

  7. IMPLICATIONS :Big deposits are found first For Major Companies • Avoid grassroots exploration in mature districts. If you are not first or second, you are probably too late • Need to continuously assess the maturity of the district (a good indicator is the discovery cost per unit of metal). At some point in time, brownfields exploration for medium-sized deposits becomes uneconomic

  8. IMPLICATIONS :Deposit size-frequency For Major Companies • Should have a large tenement package as this : • Raises the probability that the largest deposit is on your tenement • Facilitates incremental discoveries – even smaller mines feeding into a large central mill can be financially attractive For Junior Companies • Small deposits are often found near giants and there are a lot more of them to find • Small discoveries may end up being sold to a larger operator next door (key issue – will you get a fair price ?) or operated on their own

  9. OBSERVATION 4 :New concepts/technology can help reinvigorate a mature district … Cumulative Copper Resources Discovered in Chile (mt Cu) Outcroppingore bodies Porphyry model applied to outcrop Persistant explorn in known camps Chuquicamata La Escondida New Process Technology SXEW El Teniente Covered ore zones Year Discovered Source : WMC 1997 … but the pay-off gets smaller each time

  10. IMPLICATIONS :Be Innovative • Innovation can be in several forms : • New search methods (Airborne Gravity) • New conceptual models (Olympic Dam) • New process technologies (SXEW for Cu, Heap Leaching for Au) • New financing methods (gold loans, project finance) • Strong relationships with local communities & governments • Remember that Observations 1 to 3 still apply • In a mature district, must have a new concept/technology to be a “new” first mover For Major Companies For Junior Companies • Can be a fast follower, but must understand the strategic implications/limitations

  11. OBSERVATION 5 :In terms of finding big deposits, the majors have a better track record than the juniors Discovery Performance for Majors vs. Juniors : 1989-99) 17% 25% 5% 37% 5% 78% 70% 63% note : Based on Western World discoveries in 1989-98 of gold and base metals with an in-situ value >US$1B Source : Metals Economic Group July 2000

  12. IMPLICATIONS :On average, perception doesn’t match reality for large deposits • Risky to rely on juniors to be your de facto exploration team • As always, the right partner is critical For Junior Companies • Success of juniors in finding “small” deposits has led to a false impression with respect to large discoveries For Major Companies

  13. OBSERVATION 6 :Average cost of finding big deposits appears to be rising Exploration Cost per Large Discovery : June 2000 US$m Average for 1989-98 was US$560m per Major Discovery note : Rise may be due to lack of recent data na note : Based on Western World discoveries of gold and base metals with an in-situ value >US$1B Source : Metals Economic Group July 2000

  14. IMPLICATIONS :Rising finding costs For Major Companies • Corporate view that it is “cheaper” to buy than to find is leading to : • General cutback in grassroots exploration • Increased reliance on acquiring other company’s discoveries For Junior Companies • More difficult to raise risk money : • Risk capital has shifted to the technology sector • Increased reliance on majors for funding General issues for the Industry : On average, exploration doesn’t seem to pay its way Replacement of existing mines

  15. SUMMARY : Simple Observations • Most of the minerals industry’s wealth is captured by a handful of giant deposits • Within a district, most of the endowment Is tied up in handful of deposits • In a given district, the largest deposits tend to be found first … and for the least exploration cost • New concepts can help reinvigorate a mature district • In terms of finding giant deposits, the majors have a better track record than the juniors • Average cost of finding giant deposits appears to be rising

  16. CONCLUSIONS : Significant Implications The observation is that there are plenty of options, however …. • A strategy based on exceptions will fail on average • There is more than one good strategy • If you have a strategy but don’t follow it, you don’t have a strategy • Can’t afford to be “average” at exploration • Majors must focus on exploring for (and developing) world-class deposits For a given Company the “correct” exploration strategy will depend upon : Relationships with others Financial resources Technical capabilities Existing operations Time horizon Attitude to risk

More Related