Measuring Acoustic Wavelength and Velocity

111 Views

Download Presentation
## Measuring Acoustic Wavelength and Velocity

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

**Measuring Acoustic Wavelength and Velocity**Diva, Tama & Hafiz**Introduction**Wave properties: • Wavelength (λ): parallel displacement in one cycle. • Amplitude (a): maximum perpendicular displacement. • Period (t): time taken for one cycle. • Frequency (f): cycles undergone per unit time. • Velocity (v): linear displacement per unit time.**Resonance principle**• Every half a cycle, a wave reaches its amplitude. • When the amplitude of a sound wave makes contact with a physical barrier (e.g. the inside of a tube), it amplifies the sound’s intensity. This effect is called resonance.**Hypothesis**• The relationship between velocity, wavelength and frequency is defined as v = λf • By generating a sound wave with a constant frequency and finding its wavelength through the points of resonance, we might be able to find the speed of sound through a medium using a derivative of the above formula.**Materials**• Biuret • Tuning forks (216 Hz, 288 Hz, 512 Hz) • Bucket • Retort stand**Procedure**• Fill the biuret to the brim with tap water. • Tap the tuning fork on a hard surface and listen to its vibration as closely to the surface as possible. • Open the biuret and let the water flow out. When the water level reaches a point of resonance, the note should be momentarily amplified. • Rinse and repeat until no further resonance is heard.**Assuming that the sound wave experiences resonance every**half a cycle, l2 – l1 = λ/2 • Where l = distance of a given resonance point from the surface.**Sources of error**• Irregular water flow • External disturbances • Tuning fork vibration frequency not necessarily the same as the sound wave generated • Human error • False positives • Mistiming • Zero error/parallax**Results**l2 – l1 = 2.1 cm, 3.5 cm Calculated length: 4.2 cm, 7.0 cm Mean result: 5.6 cm Calculated velocity: 12.096 ms-1 Average difference: 3.0 cm, 3.1 cm Avg. calculated length: 6.0 cm, 6.2 cm Mean result: 6.1 cm Calculated velocity: 13.176ms-1**l2 – l1 = 3.1 cm, 2.7 cm**Calculated length: 6.2 cm, 5.4 cm Mean result: 5.8 cm Calculated velocity: 16.704 ms-1 Average difference: 3.7 cm, 3.1 cm Avg. calculated length: 7.4 cm, 6.2 cm Mean result: 6.8 cm Calculated velocity: 19.584 ms-1**l2 – l1 = 4.6 cm, 5.7 cm**Calculated length: 9.2 cm, 11.4 cm Mean result: 10.3 cm Calculated velocity: 52.736ms-1 Average difference: 3.2 cm, 5.4 cm Avg. calculated length: 6.4 cm, 10.8 cm Mean result: 8.1 cm Calculated velocity: 41.472 ms-1**Observation**• The values calculated were much lower than the known speed of sound in air (334.2 m/s) • This might be due to the experiment method, which depends on human hearing to take readings and is therefore prone to human error.**Conclusion**• Though the concept is sound, a more reliable method of measurement is required to achieve proper results. • Hence, this lab session is inconclusive.**References**• Brian Arnold et al. International A/AS-Level Physics. London: Hodder Education, 2008. • “Sound Waves”. Rice University Web Services. Rice University, n.d.