1 / 17

Mohamed F. Sessay UNEP/GEF

Lessons Learnt in Implementation of a Multi-Country (Regional) UNEP/GEF Desert Margins Programme (DMP). Mohamed F. Sessay UNEP/GEF. Summary Description of DMP. DMP is a six year, 3 phased (2 years/phase) project

helen
Download Presentation

Mohamed F. Sessay UNEP/GEF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lessons Learnt in Implementation of a Multi-Country (Regional) UNEP/GEF Desert Margins Programme (DMP) Mohamed F. Sessay UNEP/GEF

  2. Summary Description of DMP • DMP is a six year, 3 phased (2 years/phase) project • Aims: to arrest land degradation in Africa’s desert margins by specifically addressing: loss of biodiversity, reduced sequestration of carbon, and increased soil erosion and sedimentation associated with land degradation in drylands • Goal: to conserve and restore biodiversity in the desert margins (drylands) through sustainable utilization • Objective (Purpose): to develop and implement strategies for conservation, restoration and sustainable use of drylands biodiversity (to enhance ecosystem functions and resilience).

  3. A Multi-dimensional Partnership • Participating countries: Botswana, Namibia, South Africa and Zimbabwe (southern Africa); Kenya (eastern Africa) and Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Senegal (western Africa) • Participating Institutions: ICRISAT (EA) in partnership with NARs (KARI, DRFN, ARCZ, INRAN, INRAS, University of Botswana, North West University, South Africa, etc.); CGIAR/IARCs (ICRISAT, ICRAF, IFDC, CIAT/TSBF, ILRI), ARIs (CIRAD, CEH, IRD), Sub-regional Organization (CORAF for western Africa, SADC/SACCAR for southern Africa and ASARECA for eastern Africa) Plus UN (UNEP & UNDP as GEF IAs)

  4. Project Cost & Financing • Target Population: 120 million people with some of the highest population growth rates in the world (NB: one-third of World’s 6 billion people live in drylands) • Livelihoods of population: rain-fed agriculture and natural rangelands, particularly vulnerable to climate change and impact on food security • Project Cost and Financing: Total cost 49.5m of which GEF US$ 16m and cash and in-kind co-finance of US$ 33.5m fromgovernments and development partners

  5. Land degradation severity in desert margins of SSA High Low Non-degraded DMP member countries DMP potential countries

  6. DMP Outputs and Components • Ecological Monitoring and Assessment: for improved understanding of ecosystems status and dynamics with regard to loss of biodiversity • Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use: strategies for conservation, restoration and sustainable use of degraded ecosystems developed and implemented • Sub-regional, National and Local Capacity Building: capacity of stakeholder and target populations enhanced • Alternative Livelihoods: alternative livelihood systems tested and promoted

  7. Outputs and Components (Continued) • Policy and Legal Framework: sound policy interventions/guidelines for sustainable resource use formulated, adopted and implemented • Extension of Sustainable Natural Resource Management: participatory NRM methods are implemented • Stakeholder Participation: the target populations are involved at each stage of the project cycle

  8. Challenges at Start of Implementation • Multi-Country, Bilingual and Geographical Coverage: of project and implications for coordination and communication • Management at regional and national levels: EA and other CGIAR institution with primary focus on research, IARCs also research, NARS with limited capacity and embedded in government structures and bureaucracy • Financial: routine monitoring of disbursement, ensuring that counterpart contribution is fully committed, received and deployed on time

  9. Challenges (Continued) • Monitoring Implementation: location of UNEP (GEF IA) in Nairobi, and EA’s HQ in India with Regional Office (RCU) in Niger , sub-office in Bulawayo, plus NARs • Beneficiaries: not homogenous group; bringing on board as owners/partners within reasonably short time • Weak Extension Services: in countries but especially in drylands (perception of harsh environment not conducive for attracting the best nationally)

  10. Opportunities DMP Presents • UNEP & GEF Flagship Project: of fight against land degradation and desertification and biodiversity conservation and enhanced livelihoods in marginal areas (raison d’etres). • DMP a multidimensional partnership: that exists to pull resources and help partners build expertise to achieve positive impact on the ground in a cost-effective manner • Recognizes the synergies that exist among various stakeholders and systematically using these for mutual benefit • Builds on existing NAP of UNCCD, formulate and pilot appropriate sustainable solutions

  11. Lessons Learnt during Implementation of DMP • Strong Project Management at regional, sub-regional – (a) GCU (b) Adequate and timely financial flow to partners • Research is paramount but must be complemented with strong extension and should support livelihoods of target population (if impact is to be sustained) • Up scaling of proven technologies and sharing of best practices between sub-regions and with others should be fast tracked.

  12. Lessons Learnt (Continued) • Linkages with policy is important and must be promoted in order to achieve up-scaling. Constant dialogue with policy and decision-makers is a prerequisite • Improvements of livelihoods (provision of alternative livelihoods) of local population is both an entry point for project and also guarantees sustainability of project impacts • To look out for and take advantage of new emerging opportunities (whether new resources, technology/best practices, partnerships, etc.)

  13. Lessons Learnt (Continued) • Capacity Building of Stakeholders/ Beneficiaries as well as project personnel should be given high priority. Advanced training linked to project activities and impacts sought to create a pool of professionals at national level • Priority to identifying and making use of indigenous (local) knowledge and expertise and including that as integral part of capacity building • Documenting and reporting of experiences for validation, sharing and accountability should be high priority

  14. Lessons Learnt (Continued) • Personal fulfillment – time committed is extremely high but with deep commitment the reward is equally satisfying and that is seeing positive impact on the ground

  15. An example of A Sahelian Eco-Farm

  16. Micro-doses of mineral fertilizer • Problem: • Declining soil fertility -> declining yields • Low or negative economical return of standard doses of mineral fertilizer on rainfed crops • Access to fertilizer Solution: Micro-doses of mineral fertilizer (NPK or DAP)  double yields on deficient soils  minimize risk  trigger a positive snowball effect on production system OM (livestock, wind erosion control through mulching)

  17. Thank you for your attention

More Related