1 / 8

The van Hiele levels

The van Hiele levels. MA418 – Spring 2010 McAllister. Who were the van Hiele’s?. Dr. Pierre van Hiele and Dr. Dina van Hiele-Geldof were a husband and wife mathematics education research team in the Netherlands

hedva
Download Presentation

The van Hiele levels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The van Hiele levels MA418 – Spring 2010 McAllister

  2. Who were the van Hiele’s? • Dr. Pierre van Hiele and Dr. Dina van Hiele-Geldof were a husband and wife mathematics education research team in the Netherlands • They observed children and developed a theory of how individuals progress through 5 levels of geometric thinking

  3. Level 0 - Recognition • Students at this level rely only on their perception of the figure. • This level is totally concrete. • This level is holistic – all of the following might be perceived as triangles:

  4. Level 1 – Analysis of single shapes • Rely on perception and is still concrete • Know the names and properties of specific geometric figures • Do not see relationships between various types of figures: • May not recognize that a square is a special type of rectangle.

  5. Level 2 – Relationships among shapes • Beginning to develop abstract understanding of figures • Able to create meaningful definitions and form informal arguments and proofs • The role and significance of form deduction is not understood

  6. Level 3 – Deductive reasoning • Can reason abstractly about figures – no longer depend upon concrete figures to reason and make deductions • Can construct a deductive proof using definitions and axioms – such as those found in a high school geometry class

  7. Level 4 - Rigor • Have the ability to understand geometry as an axiomatic system • Can construct indirect proofs and proofs by contrapositive • Can understand non-Euclidean systems • Ability to reason is no longer dependent upon any type of diagram or concrete figure.

  8. Effective instruction to achieve advancement • Lecture and memorization alone are not effective • Students need to be actively engaged with the figures and objects they are studying • Touching, drawing, measuring, constructing, folding, discussing, making deductions, etc. is essential

More Related