180 likes | 287 Views
This paper by Yao Zhao, Leo Zhao, and Yan Chen explores the significance of the hidden terminal problem in wireless local area networks (WLANs) and its susceptibility to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks. It begins with an overview of the hidden terminal problem, discussing how it affects large WLANs with limited orthogonal channels. The authors present methods for diagnosing and detecting such attacks while highlighting the challenges posed by the RTS-CTS mechanism and interference from other devices. The work emphasizes that strategic approaches are needed to mitigate these stealthy attacks while enhancing network reliability.
E N D
Hidden Terminal based Attack, Diagnosis and Detection Yao Zhao, Leo Zhao, Yan Chen Lab for Internet & Security Tech, Northwestern Univ.
Outline • Motivation • Background on Hidden Terminal Problem • Hidden Terminal based DoS attacks in WLAN • Current Work on Diagnosis and Detection
Motivation • Hidden terminal problem is usually studied in wireless ad hoc networks • Hidden terminal problem for WLAN • HT exists in large WLAN • Limited channels: only 3 out of 11 channels are orthogonal to each other • To cover a large hotspot, hidden terminal problems may occur because of the deployment of APs • Easy to launch DoS attack to WLAN
Outline • Motivation • Background on Hidden Terminal Problem • Hidden Terminal based DoS attacks in WLAN • Current Work on Diagnosis and Detection
What’s Hidden Terminal Problem • S sends a packet to D • H doesn’t know D is receiving packet and broadcast a packet to another node during S’s sending • Two packets are collided at D S D H
RTS DATA CTS ACK CTS Mitigation of HT Problem • RTS-CTS-DATA-ACK procedure • NAV is included in RTS and CTS S D H
Problem of RTS-CTS • WLAN doesn’t enable RTS-CTS by default • RTS and CTS are overhead • In single AP scenario, no HT at all since every clients only communicate with the AP • RTS-CTS cannot totally solve HT problem • A packet may not be correctly received if there’s interference whose strength is much weaker than the packet (1/10)
RTS DATA Interference CTS CTS HT Problem Still Exists • CTS can’t be received by H • H can send P to interfere with DATA S D H P
Outline • Motivation • Background on Hidden Terminal Problem • Hidden Terminal based DoS attacks in WLAN • Current Work on Diagnosis and Detection
HT Problem in WLAN • Hard to deploy WLAN to avoid HT • No global deployment in some environments 3 2 2 B A 1 1 3 3 2
HT based DoS • Use two laptops in ad hoc mode • Simple: no extra hardware or change of MAC needed • Powerful • Stealthy
Powerful Attack: Cover Range (1) • P~dα, α=4 (usually 2<α<4) • Packet can’t be received correctly if interfering packets’ power > 1/10 power of the packet
Powerful Attack: Cover Range (2) • AP as sender • Receivers in shaded area suffer HT problem
Conclusion on HT Based Attack • Powerful • About ½ of the coverage of an AP is affected by HT • Stealthy • The victim cannot receive packets from HT • The packets from HT are legal packets • Several factors have the same symptoms: low signals but normal noises • Long distance between AP and clients • Hidden terminal • Phone/Microwave/Bluetooth interference
Current Work on Diagnosis • Preliminary ideas: • Pre-define the coverage area • Strategic walk from different directions
Q&A Thanks!
Future Works • Identify the reason of low throughput • Long distance between AP and clients • HT problem • Phone/Microwave interference • Locate the HT • The victim cannot receive packets from HT • Triangulation approach may not work in indoor environment