Are capitalism and democracy failing us? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

are capitalism and democracy failing us n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Are capitalism and democracy failing us? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Are capitalism and democracy failing us?

play fullscreen
1 / 25
Are capitalism and democracy failing us?
207 Views
Download Presentation
havily
Download Presentation

Are capitalism and democracy failing us?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Are capitalism and democracy failing us? Raghuram Rajan

  2. Capitalism and democracy in crisis • Crisis and bail out. • Technocratic governments, central banks around the world. • Enormous levels of youth unemployment, foreclosure crisis. • Meanwhile the “one percent” have received much of the gains in recent years in the United States. • The rise of oligarchies elsewhere? • Have the capitalists captured policy? Is “labor” powerless? Is democracy dead?

  3. Outline of talk • The crisis was not caused by elitist or corporatist policies. • It had macro/populist underpinnings • But the elite is in disrepute because the consequences of the crisis have been broadly felt, even while the elite have escaped. • Moreover • To deal with the legacy of the crisis, a variety of quasi-property rights of the masses will have to be violated. • The property of the elite is better protected. • If popular perceptions go against the elite, capitalism and democracy are in trouble. • To strengthen both we need to restore opportunity to the middle class. • Is it possible without massive intervention?

  4. Macroeconomic underpinnings of the crisis • Strong growth post war, especially in Europe. • Reconstruction • Resumption of trade • Spread of new technologies • Spread of education • Rents shared, labor peace • Expansion of welfare state: Promises as if growth would not end. • But then low hanging fruit plucked, oil shock, growth slowed. Robert Gordon, NBER WP 2004

  5. Reactions • Keynesian stimulus – stagflation • Monetary rigor – Volcker disinflation • United States and United Kingdom: focus on supply side • Deregulation started under Jimmy Carter, continued by Ronald Reagan • Margaret Thatcher • Continental Europe • Reforms slower, push by European Commission for integrated market

  6. Deregulation • Increases competition • Increases returns to innovators, the skilled, and the creative • When accompanied by financial sector deregulation, increases returns to/power of talented human capital vs returns to financial or physical capital. • Consider the financial sector in the United States

  7. Source: Philippon and Reshef (2009)

  8. Technology and globalization further exacerbate the demand for talent

  9. But education (and skill building) has not kept up in the United States. • Race between technology and education (Golden and Katz (2009)) • Those aged 25 to 34 are less likely to have a degree than 45-54 year olds. • Skill mismatch: STEM vs social sciences. • Probably due to inadequacies in families, communities, pre-school preparation, and K-12 schooling experience.

  10. Source: Autor (2010)

  11. Implication – stagnating middle in the United States Source: Golden and Katz 2009

  12. Nuances • Caveat: New elite based on educational attainment and capabilities (and luck) rather than primarily race, gender, or even university. • CEO background and tenure • Nevertheless, increasing entrenchment – children of rich much more likely to complete college than children of poor, and difference increasing.

  13. Consequence: Let them eat credit • As more Americans left behind in perception if not in fact, increasing polarization. • Rising inequality and political pressure to do something. • But education difficult to tackle • Redistribution? No political support + huge costs • But people care about consumption. So what if they don’t have income growth. • Consumption growth through credit growth • Better still, home ownership: stake in the future as well as means to borrow • Affordable housing (Clinton), ownership society (Bush) • Instruments: FHA, Fannie, Freddie

  14. Even while income inequality increased, consumption inequality has not increased commensurately…

  15. Was deregulation a failure? • No, helped household as consumer • Walmart effect • Would have helped household as producer if skill-building had responded. • Financial deregulation helped innovation, but financial sector went off track. • Make finance boring? • Can we tame finance instead?

  16. Turning to the Euro Area • Milder reforms prior to Euro accession • Southern Europe: Insider vs Outsider economies • High unemployment before Euro accession • After Euro accession – booms • Housing (Spain) • Local government spending (Spain) • Federal government spending (Greece) • Cyclically adjusted government spending rises. • Unit labor costs rise => competitiveness falls

  17. Unemployment in Periphery

  18. In sum, have the capitalists subverted democracy? • Democracy created pressure to keep growth going. • Populist policies produced fast-working but unsustainable solution • Easy credit • Government spending • Private financiers were neither blameless nor unwilling tools. • Convergence between business and politics • But to argue that policy was solely elitist in origin and intent is a total misreading of what happened.

  19. Post Crash Policies • Resolution means altering property rights. • Bank bailouts – could have imposed more costs on shareholders and bondholders • Dividend restrictions • Capital raising rather than asset shrinkage • Moratorium on bonuses • Increasing pressure to renegotiate other promises – pensions, social security, healthcare. • Will property rights be differentially enforced? How will the public see this?

  20. Technocratic governments and institutions • Are the technocrats put in power only to violate property rights selectively? • Unelected troika • Central banks • Technocratic governments • What will the violations do to future property right protection?

  21. Democracy and Capitalism • There is a growing tension between democracy and free enterprise post-crisis. • When the masses do not see opportunity, they have little incentive to support property and free enterprise. • When they see selective enforcement of property rights, property becomes less sacrosanct • As capitalists get delegitimized, an important constraint on arbitrary government also is weakened. • Russia under Putin • Democracy suffers.

  22. Restoring opportunity • We need to restore opportunity and hope to the middle class. • Policies will pay clear dividends only in the long run. • Education and skills • Innovation • Need to address distress in short run • How to get the unemployed, especially the young, into the labor force? • How to retrain those in sunset industries? • How to engage the unemployable? • How to persuade the working rich to go along?

  23. Restoring faith in property • What promises will governments keep? • What will be defaulted on? • What will be inflated away? • What will be bailed out? • Who will pay? • How will decisions be made? • How legitimate will it appear?

  24. Bottom line • Our problems are not elite capture (at least not any more than in the past). • Industrial democracies are facing up to developmental problems that they thought they never would have to face again. • Electorates are impatient and divided, so politicians respond with short term policies. • These policies can make things worse, and reduce support for free enterprise. • Loss of capitalist legitimacy can reduce an important check on arbitrary government. • Can we afford to let that happen?

  25. Thank You