1 / 16

Directors in the twilight zone

Directors in the twilight zone. Neil Cooper Partner, Kroll Corporate Advisory & Restructuring Past President, INSOL International. The “Twilight Zone”. The period when the future of the company is uncertain - Is it solvent or insolvent? Is it profitable or loss-making? In essence,

Download Presentation

Directors in the twilight zone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Directors in the twilight zone Neil Cooper Partner, Kroll Corporate Advisory & Restructuring Past President, INSOL International

  2. The “Twilight Zone” • The period when the future of the company is uncertain - • Is it solvent or insolvent? • Is it profitable or loss-making? • In essence, will it survive or fail?

  3. Introduction • considerable advances in corporate governance generally • insufficient consideration of liability in the twilight zone • two publications by INSOL International • In essence, it is the time when directors’ responsibilities change from protecting shareholders to protecting creditors

  4. Main issues • On what does “twilight zone” depend • Actions giving rise to liability • Who may be liable • Orders available to the court • Impact on counterparties • Enforcement • Remedies • Duty to cooperate

  5. On what does the “twilight zone” depend? • whether formal proceedings commenced? • actual or assumed knowledge of insolvency? • nature of transaction? • whether other party connected or associated? • any other factors?

  6. Actions giving rise to liability • Breach of general & common law liabilities • Insolvency specific liabilities

  7. Actions giving rise to liability – early stage • falsification of company's books • transactions defrauding creditors • extortionate credit transactions • fraud in anticipation of winding-up • false representations to company's creditors

  8. Actions giving rise to liability -later stage • fraudulent (or dishonest) trading • wrongful (or negligent) trading • preferences • transactions at undervalue • incurring further credit during the twilight period

  9. What defences are permitted? • lack of actual knowledge of insolvency • reasonable belief of solvency of company at time of/after transaction • benefit to company or group of related companies from transaction • other (e.g. technical defence no intention to prefer)

  10. Who may be liable? • Directors • Shadow directors • De facto directors • Former directors • Lenders/financiers • Third parties dealing with directors with or without knowledge of insolvency

  11. Orders available to the court • pay compensation to company • liability to creditors • disqualified from acting as director • imprisonment or fine • setting aside "tainted" transaction • postponing any debt owed by company to director

  12. Duty to co-operate • who is subject to a duty to co-operate with the office holder • defence of privilege against self-incrimination? • court sanction to enforce duty by fine and/or imprisonment • statutory presumptions reversing burden of proof where connected parties concerned

  13. Sundry issues • Time limits for actions • Appeal periods • Foreign application as well as domestic? • D & O insurance • Ability to incur further credit in twilight period

  14. Pros and cons Pros • Stop recklessness before too late • Encourages responsible management • Incentive to hire professionals Cons • Accelerates collapse • Inhibits workouts • Weakens enterprise initiative • Increases risk to lenders & introduces uncertainty

  15. In practice • Most directors start out honest • Poor results encourage little lies • which leads to bigger deception • and need to falsify • coupled with self-justification • and eventually little left to lose • And they can’t work out how it ended that way

  16. International best practice • Need for positive encouragement for improved corporate governance • Financing consequences • Increased penalties for abuse • Wrongful trading test is most workable • Improved rescue laws provide viable alternatives to directors

More Related