Quantifying the impact of aircraft cannibalization task mm0206
1 / 12

Quantifying the Impact of Aircraft Cannibalization Task MM0206 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Quantifying the Impact of Aircraft Cannibalization Task MM0206. Principal Investigator C. Richard Cassady, Ph.d., P.E. Co-Principal Investigators Scott J. Mason, Ph.D., P.E.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Quantifying the Impact of Aircraft Cannibalization Task MM0206' - hachi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Quantifying the impact of aircraft cannibalization task mm0206

Quantifying the Impact of Aircraft Cannibalization Task MM0206

Principal Investigator C. Richard Cassady, Ph.d., P.E.

Co-Principal Investigators Scott J. Mason, Ph.D., P.E.

Justin R. Chimka, Ph.D.

Graduate Research Assistants Kellie Schneider

Stephen Ormon

Undergraduate Research Assistants Chase Rainwater

Mauricio Carrasco

Jason Honeycutt

ASC PA 03-2420 9/15/03

Project motivation
Project Motivation

  • extensive use of cannibalization in fleet maintenance

  • existing mathematical models of cannibalization do not address USAF issues

Project objectives and activities
Project Objectives and Activities

  • project objectives

    • to develop a mathematical modeling methodology for assessing the impact of cannibalization on fleet performance

    • to identify policies for making cost-effective, dynamic cannibalization decisions

    • to study the impact of these policies on management of the spare parts supply chain

  • project activities

    • generic scenario definition

    • generic simulation modeling

    • application

    • future work

Generic scenario definition
Generic Scenario Definition

  • set of n independent and identical aircraft

  • each aircraft

    • two parts connected in series

    • part i has a constant failure rate λi

  • aircraft operation

    • continuous until failure

  • aircraft failure – caused by failure of part j

    • immediately routed to base of operations for Mx

  • sj part j “spares” in the system





Maintenance logic
Maintenance Logic

failure – remove part j (time Rj) – send removed part off for repair (time Lj)

spare part j available?



install part j (time Ij)

cannibalization allowed?



cannibalization possible?



cannibalize (time Cj) – cannibalized aircraft now needs both parts

aircraft departs

aircraft waits

Maintenance logic cont
Maintenance Logic (cont.)

repaired part j returned to base

failed aircraft waiting for only part j?



install part j on failed aircraft

failed aircraft waiting for both parts?



spare of other part available?



aircraft departs

restore aircraft

add part to inventory

Generic simulation modeling
Generic Simulation Modeling

  • simulation model of defined scenario constructed in Arena

  • performance measures estimated from model include:

    • average readiness (R)

    • Mx-man-hours per flying hour (MMH/FH)

    • average “experience” of a failed aircraft

Performance analysis example
Performance Analysis – Example

(min, mode, max) in hr

Performance analysis cont
Performance Analysis (cont.)

  • suppose target average readiness is 80%

  • suppose no cannibalization is permitted

    • R = 78.8%

    • MMH/FH = 0.0035

  • suppose cannibalization is permitted

    • R = 81.9%

    • MMH/FH = 0.0042

  • cannibalization satisfied the readiness issue but increased requirements for Mx resources

  • what are some other options?

    • 1. add a spare for part 2

    • 2. reduce the repair delay for part 2 by two days

  • option 1: R = 84.2%, MMH/FH = 0.0036

  • option 2: R = 81.2%, MMH/FH = 0.0036

Performance analysis cont1
Performance Analysis (cont.)

  • suppose all three options are implemented

    • R = 86.6%

    • MMH/FH = 0.0039

    • average “experience” of a failed aircraft

      • 23.5% receive a spare immediately

      • 11.9% are restored via cannibalization

      • 64.6% must wait

        • average time waiting for a single part = 70 hr

        • 11.9% become cannibalized

        • average waiting time after cannibalization = 174 hr

Application outline
Application Outline

  • Hill AFB visit

  • motivating questions

    • should cannibalization be consolidated?

    • how many technicians should be assigned to the CANN-dock?

    • how many aircraft should be designated as CANN-birds?

    • how long should aircraft remain in CANN-bird status?

  • simulation modeling

Simulation modeling application
Simulation Modeling – Application

  • based on the cannibalization activities that take place at Hill AFB

  • modeling concepts

    • one wing, three squadrons

    • cannibalization, slaving

    • AMU-level or consolidated cannibalization

    • fixed number of CANN-birds

    • rebuilds after specified number of days

    • rework and testing after rebuilds

    • limited number of maintenance technicians

    • various technician skill sets

    • technicians pulled from AMU to CANN-dock