P repared for PLIAG by citizen members from e ast Silver Spring neighborhoods 30 July 2014

1. Operational PL Noise and Vibration identifying high-impact locations in quiet, residential and small-business areas of Silver Spring Prepared for PLIAG by citizen members from east Silver Spring neighborhoods 30 July 2014

2. Beltway Wayne Ave You are here Sil Spring Civ Ctr One half mile of sweet residential that Is perfectly quiet at night DC .5mile

3. MANCHESTER DALE • HIGH RISK FOR EXCESSIVE WHEEL SQUEAL • From friction on corners and curves • PL ALIGNMENT JUST IN THIS HALF MILE HAS: • THREE HARD TURNS, • FOUR LARGE NATURAL CURVES, • SLOW IN AND OUT OF THREE PL STATIONS,MOST OF IT BRAKE-RIDING ON A HILL DOWNTOWN SILVER SPRING LIBRARY

4. MANCHESTER DALE • ADD • HIGH RISK FOR EXCESSIVE WARNING HORNS • AND SCREECHING STOPS • THE PL ALIGNMENT INTERCEPTS: • TEN NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS, • 45 PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAYS • TWO SCHOOLS, • TWO CHURCHES • PLAYING FIELDS AND • A SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY LIBRARY

5. HIGH RISK OF EXCESSIVE VIBRATION ON BONIFANT STREET: • TRAINS WITHIN A FEW FEET • OF SEVERAL DOZEN POPULAR SMALL BUSINESSES

6. HIGH RISK OF EXCESSIVE VIBRATION ON RESIDENTIAL WAYNE AVE: • TRAINS WITHIN FEET OF FRONT DOORS AND YARDS • OF 45 PRIVATE HOMES AND • THE LIVING COMMUNITY OF 150 SENIORS

7. Noise remedies planned for Montgomery County west of Silver Spring Remaining Noise remedy available for Silver Spring and points east ….?? Miles of noise walls Because trains never cross paths with cars or people here, there are multiple options for sound absorbing rail beds No warning hornrisk here because every “crossing” for miles Is eliminated by PL’s new underpassesand above-grade bridges - - - - - - - - - With no crossings,they can use track lubricant as needed NONE of these can be used on Wayne or Bonifant

8. Noise remedies planned for Montgomery County west of Silver Spring Remaining Noise remedy available for Silver Spring and points east!!! Miles of noise walls Because trains never cross paths with cars or people here, there are multiple options for sound absorbing rail beds No warning hornrisk here because every “crossing” for miles Is eliminated by PL’s new underpassesand above-grade bridges - - - - - - - - - With no crossings,they can use track lubricant as needed NONE of these can be used on Wayne or Bonifant

9. NOISE/VIBRATION REMEDIES suggested by community • TO BE PART OF PL DESIGN • 1. REQUIRE MATERIALS THAT ABSORB NOISE • Require that your surface materials in high risk areasare non-sound-reflective materials, completely sound-absorbent materials, for Track beds, for paths and for retaining walls. • 2. (New idea) MAYBE REDUCE ROAD CURVES SOMEWHAT TO REDUCE SQUEAL • When rebuilding Wayne Ave, try to smooth some severe curves, shave some edges off and straighten existing road curvesto eliminate some inevitable Squeal (e.g., road curves near the Creek lend themselves to this). Every little bit helps. • 3. MINIMIZE NON-EMERGENCY NOISE AT NIGHT IN THE HIGH IMPACT AREAS • Have firm “night operation sound rules” for areas under bedroom windows. • Use directional sound equipment for all horns and PAs; Sound can be “pointed” as can a light beam. Aim Sound low where the warning is needed: Birds, chimneys and second floors don’t need to hear it. • 4. INCREASE TRAFFIC-CALMING ON WAYNE TO KEEP CLAMOUR DOWN • There is growing residential support for a 25 MPH speed limit on Wayne at all times -- fiercely-enforced ---- to reduce near-misses that happen already and when mercifully no one is hurt, to reduce the clamour of screeching brakes, horns, and all kinds of accompanying drama. Now with advent of PL, we must calm Wayne down.

10. NOISE/VIBRATION REMEDIES suggested by community • TO BE PART OF PL DESIGN • 5. SET “MARYLAND’S OWN STANDARDS” FOR NOISE AND VIBRATION • THAT ARE BETTER THAN FTA’S “AVERAGES” IN HIGH IMPACT AREAS • Citizens have proposed since last year that Maryland could “do better for its citizens” • than FTA’s average standards ever would, in areas where it is quieter at night • or closer to operational trains than FTA standards even admit. • Henry Kay responded on the spot last winter that it was a good idea worth pursuing. • That has not happened. RFP instructions still assume FTA’s “averages” as their bar. • Maryland could still set better standards -- in strictly defined areas – and instruct • that mitigation is intensely focused in those areas • These areas would include the small business 900-block of Bonifant Street, • and the limited number of quiet night communities where trains literally run under • bedroom windows: Wayne Avenue/Silver Spring, Coquelin Run, The Hamlets, • Lynn Drive and Elm Street in Bethesda.

11. NOISE AND VIBRATION REMEDIES suggested by community • THAT CAN BE DONE BY PL WITH HOME AND PROPERTY OWNERS • 6. “Sound-proof Windows Replacement Program” • Maryland already has a mechanism for a similar program (the Energy Efficiency • window replacement) that can be the model or the operational base for this • Develop stipends, rebates, and/or tax credit amounts reflecting proximity to tracks • Start it as soon as possible, before construction. (Why wait?) • 7. Enable owners to harden insulation on interiors of walls that face tracks • Things like dense spray foam on the inside of street facing walls • make an enormous positive difference for both vibration and noise • This would be done contracted and handled by property owner BUT with a stipend, rebate and/or tax credit proportional to proximity to tracks • Start this program also before or with construction phase – no need to wait • 8. Make your noise-wall material available to homeowners near trains • Home owners or institutions might want to insulate more of their yards • Make your preferred material available to them for direct purchase • (from the vendor, not the state) but at cost • END