linac coherent light source project update n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 23

Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 184 Views
  • Uploaded on

Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update. Recent reviews Budget, continuing resolution LCLS Experiments FAC new members Highlights – changes, new issues Charge. External Independent Review 10 May – 10 June 2004. ARTHUR P. MARTIN, PE Principal Engineer – Review Lead DONALD N. FULTONBERG

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update' - griffin-collier


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
linac coherent light source project update

Linac Coherent Light Source Project Update

Recent reviews

Budget, continuing resolution

LCLS Experiments

FAC new members

Highlights – changes, new issues

Charge

external independent review 10 may 10 june 2004
External Independent Review 10 May – 10 June 2004

ARTHUR P. MARTIN, PE

Principal Engineer – Review Lead

DONALD N. FULTONBERG

Project Manager

Dr. James L. Anderson

Subject Matter Expert

CHANDER BIJLANI, PhD, P.E.

Principal Nuclear/Safety Engineer

HOWARD S. COHEN, P.E.

Principal Nuclear Engineer

ALAN J. DEMPSEY

Plant Test and Operations Manager

CHARLES W. HESS, P.E.

Chief Nuclear Engineer

EDWARD T. McCARTY

Senior Mechanical Engineer

Dr. Brian E. Newnam

Senior Scientist

CONSTANTINOS (DINOS) NICOLAOU

Supervising Project Controls Engineer

JOHN SERGENTANIS

Senior Project Engineer

outcome of eir
Outcome of EIR
  • Final report received
  • Corrective Action Plan submitted to DOE
  • Project validation letter expected shortly
    • Validation of budget/schedule
  • This one just could NOT have gone better
  • LCLS Team performed superbly
doe lehman review 10 12 august 2004
DOE Lehman Review 10-12 August 2004
  • Notification of review in July
  • Committee:

Todd Ditmire, UT Austin George Neil, JLAB Kem Robinson, LBNL Al Macrander, ANL

Dave Gurd, ORNL Ilan Ben-Zvi, BNL P. Elleaume, ESRF Dixon Bogert, FNAL

Suzanne Herron, ORNL R. Wunderlich, DOE G. Stalnaker, LLNL S. Tkaczyk, DOE

G. Desaulnier, consultant Bruce Warner, LLNL Pat Dehmer, DOE Hanley Lee, DOE

Jeff Hoy, DOE J. Muhlstein, DOE

lcls project baseline shown at 8 10 04 review
LCLS Project Baseline Shown at 8/10/04 Review

~29.5% contingency on work remaining

LCLS is ~30% complete on PED

lehman review debrief
Lehman Review Debrief
  • Concern expressed about budget/schedule
    • Conventional Facilities Contingency
    • Tunneling
    • FY2005 schedule did not reflect CR
    • Procurement staffing, schedule
  • CF Independent Cost Estimate due 15 Oct.
  • 15 October revised baseline to DOE
schedule guidance
Schedule Guidance
  • Show 1 year float to CD-4
    • Assume continuing Resolution thru December
    • Project completion before end of 2QFY2009
  • Plan Higher contingency for conventional facilities
esaab meeting
ESAAB Meeting
  • 2 November 2004
  • CD-2B, complete LCLS Project Baseline
  • CD-3A, Begin Long-Lead Acquisitions
  • Prerequisite for approval:
    • Project Execution Plan
    • Project Management Plan
  • Partner Labs’ management must approve
continuing resolution
Continuing Resolution
  • No definitive guidance on allocation of PED/R&D
    • CR limits total year’s allocation of PED to $7.5M
    • R&D not limited by CR, but by other constraints
    • DOE might provide >$1M month
  • $30M Long-Lead acquisitions
    • New start
    • $0 under a CR
    • Stops construction at SLAC and ANL
lcls experiments
LCLS Experiments
  • DOE-BES plans to approve and fund a bundle of experiment stations as a “major item of equipment” (MIE) project
  • Patterned on “Spallation Neutron Source Next Generation” (SING) Instrument MIE
  • CD-0 imminent
  • CDR, CD-1 (for the bundle) next summer
  • Separate CD-2 for each station as designs mature
  • SSRL does construction management of all
lcls scientific advisory committee
LCLS Scientific Advisory Committee

Membership

Roger Falcone - UC Berkeley, USA, Chair

Nora Berrah - Western Michigan University, USA

Phil Bucksbaum - University of Michigan, USA

Robert L. Byer - Stanford University, USA

Hans Fraunfelder - LANL, USA

Wayne Hendrickson Columbia U

Stephen R. Leone - UC Berkeley, USA

Margaret Murnane - University of Colorado-Boulder, USA

Jochen R. Schneider - HASYLAB, Germany

Francesco Sette - ESRF, France

Sunil Sinha - UCSD, USA

Dietrich von der Linde - University of Essen, Germany

Meetings

27-28 October 2004 - Meeting 2 – Start planning experiments

25-26 October 2004 - LCLS Experimental R&D Workshop

8-9 July 2004 – Meeting 1- Review Letters of Intent

1-2 December 2003

call for letters of intent
Call for Letters of Intent
  • Three types of proposals
    • Complete end stations
    • Proposals for scientific experiments
    • Special instrumentation
  • 32 Letters of Intent received
  • 256 Signatories
results
Results
  • SAC has defined 5 research thrusts for LCLS
  • Coordinator, SSRL contact named for each
  • No prioritization of programs at this time
  • Detector Development Referred to Special Committee
lcls experiment programs
LCLS Experiment Programs

Program Team Leader Co-leader SSRL Contact

Coherent Scattering G. B. Stephenson K. Ludwig S. Brennan

at the Nanoscale

Pump/Probe Diffraction K. Gaffney D. Reis A. Lindenberg

Dynamics J. Larrson

Pump/Probe High Energy R. Lee P. Hermann J. B. Hastings

Density (HED) Physics

Nano-particle and Single J. Hajdu J. Miao J. Arthur

Molecule(non-periodic) H. Chapman

Imaging

Atoms, Molecules & L. Di Mauro N. Berrah J. B. Hastings

Optical Science

defining lcls experiment stations
Defining LCLS Experiment Stations
  • Ultrafast Science and LCLS Experiments Workshop 25-26 October 2004
    • http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl/2004/workshops.htm
  • A Workshop in Ultrafast Science and LCLS Experiments at SSRL will be organized on October 25-26, 2004. There will also be a pre-registration reception on Sunday evening, October 24th from 5-7 pm. The tentative schedule for the workshop is a joint session on Monday morning, October 25th. On Monday afternoon and Tuesday morning, there will be breakout sessions for each of the five thrust areas of the LCLS: (1) Atomic, molecular and optical physics, (2) High energy density states of matter, (3) Optical pump-x-ray probe studies in chemistry, biology and materials science, (4) Diffraction imaging of single objects approaching atomic scale resolution and (5) Coherent x-ray scattering for the study of dynamics (X-ray photon correlation spectroscopy). The workshop will end with a joint session on Tuesday afternoon, October 26th. The workshop and breakout sessions will focus on the scientific goals and technical needs of the LCLS experimental end-stations, as well as experimental specifications. This workshop provides an opportunity to all users, including potential future users to participate in building ultrafast science at LCLS by providing input and sharing their scientific ideas.
  • If you are interested in participating in the atomic, molecular and optical physics breakout session at the meeting please contact Lou DiMauro (dimauro@bnl.gov), Phil Bucksbaum (phb@umich.edu), Nora Berrah (berrah@wmich.edu) or Jerry Hastings (jbh@slac.stanford.edu).  If you are interested in any of the other breakout thrust areas please contact John Arthur (jarthur@SLAC.Stanford.EDU).
  • For program information see: http://www-conf.slac.stanford.edu/ssrl/2004/lcls_workshop.htm
scientific advisory committee meeting
Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting

27-28 October

  • Start of CD-1 activity
  • Presentations by each Team Leader
    • Near- and Long-term goals
    • Performance requirements, near- and long-term
      • Intensity, repetition rate
      • Wavelength
        • Commissioning likely to progress from 1.5 to 0.15 nm
    • Time scale for production of conceptual design (CD-1)
detector development
Detector Development
  • Review requires expertise not on the SAC
  • Detector Subcommittee formed
  • Review to be scheduled in early 2005
    • Y. Amemiya, U. of Tokyo
    • Gareth Derbyshire, RAL (Chair)
    • Eric Eikenberry, SLS
    • Lothar Strueder, Max Planck Inst.
    • Albert Walenta, Univ. Siegen
detector development within the lcls
Detector Development within the LCLS
  • LCLS planning included detector development since 2/2002, @ $4M
  • Exploratory research at Cornell, in pixel array detector
  • Decision to fund further development in 2006, based on initial findings
lcls design
LCLS Design
  • Seeking commercial source for laser
  • Dual feed to gun, correction of dipole AND quadrupole RF fields
  • Dual feed to first accelerating section
  • Significant progress in planning EPICS controls and in staffing
  • Laser heater still looks good
  • Enhanced SASE?
  • Roll-Away undulator
  • K-control by means of canted poles
  • Electromagnet quadrupoles in undulator channel
  • AC impedance in undulator beam pipe – requires evaluation
  • New strategies for FEL commissioning
  • Progress on gas/solid attenuator conceptual design
  • Conventional facilities
    • Experiment halls unchanged since last visit
    • Considering alternatives for Central Lab Office Complex design
lcls facility advisory committee
LCLS Facility Advisory Committee

Membership

Kem Robinson, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Chair

Harry Carter, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)

A. Chargin LLNL

John Cleary, Stanford University (SU)

John Corlett, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)

Massimo Cornacchia, SLAC (retired)

Roger Falcone, UC Berkeley

Josef Feldhaus, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)

Paul Fouss, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)

Thomas Himel, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)

A. Kugler BJY

Wim Leemans, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)

Pat O'Shea, University of Maryland (UMD)

Joachim Pflueger, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)

Thomas Rabedeau, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC)

Jörg Rossbach, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)

Keith Schuh, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL)

Peter Siddons, Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)

Thomas Tschentscher, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)

Karen White, Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF)

Meetings

29-30 April 2004

12-13 October 2004

charge to committee
Charge to Committee

The LCLS Facility Advisory Committee will advise SLAC, SSRL and LCLS

management on the development of the LCLS Project through its several phases:

• Accelerator systems design and construction

• Undulator systems design and construction

• X-ray transport, optics and diagnostics design and construction

• Experiment station systems design and construction

• Conventional facilities design and construction

• Planning and execution of commissioning and early operations

We have expanded the time devoted to breakouts. Please comment on agenda

Thank you for giving your time to this review process. We value your advice