1 / 13

AADF at the Murphy Gage (Hourly Method)

This report presents an analysis of the hourly methodology implemented at the Murphy Gage, demonstrating insights from the AADF data across 2011-2013. Conducted by David Hoekema for the Swan Falls Technical Working Group, the study highlights the revised methodology using 1-hour ∆storage and 10-minute averages of 120 measurements at CJ. Key findings reveal that AADF with hourly data is more stable than actual flow, with operations being identifiable while underscoring the need for further investigation at CJ due to duplicate inflow and uncertainty regarding daily fluctuations.

goldy
Download Presentation

AADF at the Murphy Gage (Hourly Method)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AADF at the Murphy Gage (Hourly Method) Presented by: David Hoekema to the Swan Falls Technical Working Group Date: 12/04/2013

  2. Study Area

  3. Conceptual Model

  4. Analysis of WT-YR 2011-2013 • Revised Methodology • Using 1-hour ∆storage • Using 10 minute average of 120 measurements at CJ • Headwater data (smooth with 3-hour running average)

  5. Annual Comparison

  6. 2013 in Review (winter)

  7. 2013 in Review (spring)

  8. 2013 in Review (spring)

  9. 2013 in Review (spring)

  10. AADF Estimated Operations

  11. 2013 in Review (summer)

  12. Spreadsheet Review

  13. Summary from 2011-2013 Calculations • What was seen in the graphs? • AADF with hourly data is more stable than actual flow. • Operations are identifiable. • More investigation needed at CJ (duplicate inflow). • Investigation the uncertainty is needed. • How much daily fluctuation should we see?

More Related