1 / 9

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO EVALUATE CONFERENCES?

GENEVA EVALUATION NETWORK WORKSHOP CONFERENCE EVALUATION Organized by Laetitia Lienart & Glenn O’Neil Geneva, 16 March 2011. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO EVALUATE CONFERENCES?. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF CONFERENCE EVALUATIONS?. RELEVANT DATA COLLECTION METHODS.

Download Presentation

WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO EVALUATE CONFERENCES?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GENEVA EVALUATION NETWORKWORKSHOPCONFERENCE EVALUATIONOrganized by Laetitia Lienart & Glenn O’NeilGeneva, 16 March 2011

  2. WHY IS IT IMPORTANT TO EVALUATE CONFERENCES?

  3. WHAT ARE THE OBJECTIVES OF CONFERENCE EVALUATIONS?

  4. RELEVANT DATA COLLECTION METHODS • Face-to-face or phone individual interviews (structured & semi-structured) • Focus group interviews • Online surveys • Printed surveys • Structured observations of key sessions and conference areas • Review of conference programme and online resources • Review of statistical data on conference registration, scholarship recipients, abstracts, etc • Review of statistical data and evaluation findings from previous conference to allow comparison over time

  5. RELEVANT DATA COLLECTION METHODS (cont.) • Use of rapporteurs to follow sessions addressing key topics. Their feedback can be also used to measure some indicators (e.g. number of sessions presenting new findings). • Use of conference “instant” feedback systems. • Use of network analysis and mapping. • Analysis of the conference media coverage. • Review of posts and comments left by delegates and non-attendees on the conference blog, Facebook page and Twitter.

  6. Focus on IMPACT ASSESSMENT • Assessing conference impact(s) is feasible but needs to be planned and budgeted for at the planning stage (incl. in ToRs) • Methods: follow-up survey (online/face-to-face), action plans Ex: AIDS 2008 follow-up survey (1,5 year after) • 1,195 AIDS 2008 delegates completed the survey • About 2/3 had learnt something new and had changed some aspects of their work practice thanks to the new knowledge gained at the conference • Almost half reported that AIDS 2008 had directly influenced their organizations’ HIV work • Almost 4 in 10 were aware of AIDS 2008’s influences on HIV work, policies or advocacy in their countries • 75% had kept in contact with at least 1 person met at AIDS 2008, mainly to exchange knowledge, lessons learnt and/or suggested solutions (86%)

  7. USE OF EVALUATION FINDINGS • Evaluation findings should be “very usable” as conferences are often repeated annually or bi-annually. • Importance of “buy-in” of conference organizers. • Sharing of evaluation plan with conference organizers and committees/working groups*. • Evaluation reports: the quality of content and format is crucial to attract readers and convince them that evaluation results are reliable and useable. • Dissemination of evaluation results: timely, use a variety of channels depending on the target audience. • Use of follow-up mechanisms** with conference organizers and relevant stakeholders. • Review progress on evaluation findings in the lead-up to the next conference.

  8. KEY LESSONS LEARNT

  9. Further information Proceedings (slides & handouts) of a 1-day workshop on conference evaluation held in Nov 2010 are available on request (email Laetitia.Lienart@iasociety.org) Feel free to join the Conference Evaluation Google Group: http://groups.google.com/group/conference_evaluation Glenn’s blog has more resources on conference evaluation, see category “event evaluation:http://intelligentmeasurement.wordpress.com/category/event-evaluation/

More Related