conducting research 2 n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Conducting Research (2) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Conducting Research (2)

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 53

Conducting Research (2) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 213 Views
  • Uploaded on

Conducting Research (2). Dr. Rasha Salama PhD. Community Medicine. Research . Research is the systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of data to answer a certain question or solve a problem It is crucial to follow cascading scientific steps when conducting one’s research.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Conducting Research (2)' - giza


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
conducting research 2

Conducting Research (2)

Dr. Rasha Salama

PhD. Community Medicine

research
Research
  • Research is the systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of data to answer a certain question or solve a problem
  • It is crucial to follow cascading scientific steps when conducting one’s research
steps of scientific research

no need for study

Steps of Scientific Research

answers found

Literature review

Selection of area

Selection of topic

Crude research question

no answer

Refined research question

Research hypothesis, goals and objectives

Study design

Population & sampling

Variables confounding bias

Research tools

Pilot study

Work plan

Collection of data

Data management

Interpretation

Reporting

Ethical issues

1 study design
1. Study Design

Descriptive studies

Analytical studies

Case report

Observational

studies

Experimental

studies

Case serial

reports

Randomized

Controlled Clinical

trials

Case-control

studies

Cohort

studies

Randomized

Controlled field

trials

Cross-sectional

studies

Non-randomized

experiments

Prospective

Retrospective

(historical)

Ecological

studies

how could we select the best study design
How could we select the best Study design ?
  • Purpose of the study
  • State of existing knowledge (in relation to study question)
  • Characteristics of the study variables
  • Latency
  • Feasibility
purpose of the study
Purpose of the study
  • Study of etiology:
    • Ecologic
    • Cross-sectional
    • Case-control
    • Cohort
    • Intervention
  • Study of therapy:
    • Lab experiments
    • Clinical trials
    • Community intervention
state of existing knowledge in relation to study question
State of existing knowledge (in relation to study question)
  • New idea:
    • Ecologic
    • Cross-sectional
  • New hypothesis:
    • Cross-sectional
    • Case-control
  • Newly claimed association:
    • Case-control: replication, confirmation
    • Cohort: stronger evidence towards causation
  • Confirmed association:
    • Experiment/intervention: to prove causation
characteristics of the study variables
Characteristics of the study variables
  • Very rare exposures: case-control design is NOT suitable since it looks for exposure. A very large number of subjects is required.
  • Very rare disease: cohort design is NOT suitable since it looks for outcome. Follow-up of a huge number is required.
  • Acute disease: prevalence studies are not suitable
  • Risky exposures: clinical trials are unethical
  • Unavailable data: record-based studies are not suitable.
latency
Latency
  • For diseases with very long latency, the costs of concurrent cohort studies or clinical trials are prohibitively high.
feasibility
Feasibility
  • Time
  • Manpower
  • Equipment
  • Money
2 population and sampling
2. Population and Sampling
  • Sampling is the process of selection of a number of units from a defined study population.

The process of sampling involves:

    • Identification of study population
    • Determination of sampling population
    • Definition of the sampling unit
    • Choice of sampling method
    • Estimation of the sample size
identification of study population
Identification of study population
  • The study or target population is the one upon which the results of the study will be generalized.
  • It is crucial that the study population is clearly defined, since it is the most important determinant of the sampling population
determination of sampling population
Determination of sampling population
  • The sampling population is the one from which the sample is drawn.
  • The definition of the sampling population by the investigator is governed by two factors:
    • Feasibility: reachable sampling population
    • External validity: the ability to generalize from the study results to the target population.
definition of the sampling unit
Definition of the sampling unit
  • The definition of the sampling unit is done by setting:
    • Inclusion criteria
    • Exclusion criteria

(exclusion criteria are not the opposite of inclusion criteria)

choice of sampling method
Choice of sampling method
  • Non probability sampling
  • Probability sampling
non probability sampling
Non probability sampling:
  • Types of non probability sampling:
    • Convenience sampling
    • Quota sampling
  • Not recommended in medical research:

It is by far the most biases sampling procedure as it is not random (not everyone in the population has an equal chance of being selected to participate in the study).

probability sampling
Probability sampling
  • “There is a known non-zero probability of selection for each sampling unit”
  • Types:
    • Simple random sampling
    • Systematic random sampling
    • Stratified random sampling
    • Multi-stage random sampling
    • Cluster sampling
    • Multi-phase sampling
simple random sample
Simple random sample
  • In this method, all subject or elements have an equal probability of being selected. There are two major ways of conducting a random sample.
  • The first is to consult a random number table, and the second is to have the computer select a random sample.
systematic random sample
Systematic random sample
  • A systematic sample is conducted by randomly selecting a first case on a list of the population and then proceeding every Nth case until your sample is selected. This is particularly useful if your list of the population is long.
  • For example, if your list was the phone book, it would be easiest to start at perhaps the 17th person, and then select every 50th person from that point on.
stratified sample
Stratified sample
  • In a stratified sample, we sample either proportionately or equally to represent various strata or subpopulations.
  • For example if our strata were cities in a country we would make sure and sample from each of the cities. If our strata were gender, we would sample both men and women.
multistage sampling
Multistage sampling

Country

Provinces

Cities

Districts

Households

Person

cluster sampling
Cluster sampling
  • In cluster sampling we take a random sample of strata and then survey every member of the group.
  • For example, if our strata were individuals schools in a city, we would randomly select a number of schools and then test all of the students within those schools.
multi phase sample
Multi-phase sample

Population

Sample

Test 1

Sub-sample

Test 2

estimation of the sample size
Estimation of the sample size

“how many subjects should be studied?”

  • The sample size depends on the following factors:

I. Effect size

II. Variability of the measurement

III. Level of significance

IV. Power of the study

i effect size
I. Effect size

“magnitude of the difference to be detected”

  • A large sample size is needed for detection of a minute difference. Thus, the sample size is inversely related to the effect size.
ii variability of the measurement
II. Variability of the measurement:
  • The variability of measurements is reflected by the standard deviation or the variance.
  • The higher the standard deviation, the larger sample size is required. Thus, sample size is directly related to the SD
iii level of significance
III. Level of significance:
  • Relies on α error or type I error. The maximum level of α has been arbitrarily set to 5% or 0.05.
  • Alpha error can be minimized to 0.01 or even 0.001 but this consequently increases the sample size. Thus, sample size is inversely related to the level of α error.
iv power of the study
IV. Power of the study:
  • The power of the study is the probability that it will yield a statistically significant result. It is related to β error or type II error.
  • Power is equal to (1- β), consequently the power of the study is increased by decreasing the beta error. Thus, sample size is inversely related to the level of β error or directly related to the power of the study.
3 collection of data
3. Collection of Data
  • Data collected are “variables”
  • Variables are classified according to their:
    • Type:
      • QT (continuous, discrete)
      • QL ( ordinal, nominal)
    • Role in the study:
      • Dependent
      • Independent
    • Relationship with other study factors:
      • Main study variables
      • Confounding variables
      • Effect modifiers
      • Intermediate factors
methods of collection of data research tools
Methods of collection of data (research tools)
  • Selection of the suitable technique depends on:
    • The availability of information
    • The type of data
    • The resources available
    • The characteristic of the tool
research tools
Research tools
  • Most important techniques:
    • Using available information (records)
    • Observation (checklist)
    • Self-administered questionnaire
    • Interviewing (individual/group)
    • Measuring (all lab tests and other investigations)
slide32

Choosing the Format of Your questionnaire Questions

  • Fixed alternative
    • Yes/No
      • Reliable
      • Not powerful
    • Likert
  • Open-ended
    • May not be properly answered
    • May be difficult to score
slide33

Choosing the Format of Your Interview

  • Unstructured
    • Interviewer bias is a serious problem
    • Data may not be hard to analyze
  • Semi-structured
    • Follow-up questions allowed
    • Probably best for pilot studies
  • Structured
    • Standardized, reducing interviewer bias
slide34

Editing Questions: Nine Mistakes to Avoid

1. Avoid leading questions

2. Avoid questions that invite the social desirability bias

3. Avoid double-barreled questions

4. Avoid long questions

5. Avoid negations

6. Avoid irrelevant questions

7. Avoid poorly worded response options

8. Avoid big words

9. Avoid ambiguous words & phrases

measurements errors
Measurements Errors
  • Definition of “error”:

“A false or mistaken result obtained in a study or an experiment” John last, 2001.

  • Types of errors:
    • Systematic error: bias:

“ an error having a certain magnitude and direction repeated with every measurement”

    • Random error:

“ error with no fixed pattern of magnitude or direction”

slide36
Sources of errors:
    • Subject
    • Observer
    • instrument
slide37
Bias

Design

Bias

Information

Bias

(observer bias)

Interviewer bias

sample bias

Measurement bias

(intra and inter obs. Bias)

Study selection bias

Reporting bias

Recall bias

Response bias

Technical bias

design bias
Design bias

Selection bias

  • Selection bias is a distortion of the estimate of effect resulting from the manner in which the study population is selected.
  • This is probably the most common type of bias in health research, and occurs in observational, as well as analytical studies (including experiments).
slide39
a. Prevalence-incidence bias
  • This type of bias can be introduced into a case-control study as a result of selective survival among the prevalent cases.
  • In selecting cases, we are having a late look at the disease; if the exposure occurred years before, mild cases that improved, or severe cases that died would have been missed and not counted among the cases.
slide40
b. Admission rate (Berkson’s) bias
  • This type of bias is due to selective factors of admission to hospitals, and occurs in hospital-based studies.
  • The diseased individuals with a second disorder, or a complication of the original disease, are more likely to be represented in a hospital-based sample than other members of the general population.
  • Differential rates of admission will be reflected in biased estimates of the relative risks.
slide41
Non-response bias
  • This type of bias is due to refusals to participate in a study.
  • The individuals who do not participate are likely to be different from individuals who do participate. Non-respondents must be compared with respondents with regard to key exposure and outcome variables in order to ascertain the relative degree of non-response bias.
slide42
Ascertainment or information bias

Information bias is a distortion in the estimate of effect due to measurement error or misclassification of subjects according to one or more variables.

slide43
Measurement bias
  • Observer variation bias
    • Intra-observer variation
    • Inter-observer variation
  • Subject (biological variation)
  • Technical method error variation
slide44
Recall bias

An error of categorization may occur if information on the exposure variable is unknown or inaccurate.

The recall by both cases and controls may differ in both amount and accuracy. Cases are more likely to recall exposures, especially if there has been recent media exposure on the potential causes of the disease.

Example: In questioning mothers whose recent pregnancies had ended in fetal death or malformation (cases), and a matched group of mothers whose pregnancies had ended normally (controls), it was found that 48% of the former, but only 20% of the latter reported exposure to drugs.

4 work plan
4. Work plan

“State in specific steps what exactly

will be done”

  • Method:
    • Listing the activities related to the study (planning, implementation, results)
    • Identification of the responsibility for each activity
    • Setting time and date for achievement of each activity
    • Putting all these elements together in a legible form which could be a chart (GANNT chart) or a table
    • Budget and any funding agencies
slide46

Administering the Research

  • Informed consent
  • Clear instructions
  • Debriefing
  • Confidentiality
5 data management
5. Data management
  • Data management is the whole process of dealing with data from the very beginning of the study. Data analysis is just the last part of it.
  • It can be divided into the following phases:
    • Preparation of data entry
    • Data entry
    • Data analysis
slide48
Preparation for data entry:
    • Review of questionnaire forms
    • Unique I identifier
    • Coding
    • Preparation of master-sheets (manual) or spread-sheets (computer)
    • Dummy tables
    • Quality control
  • Data entry
slide49
Data analysis:

Descriptive:

Tabular presentation

Frequency distribution tables

Cross tabulations

Graphic presentation:

Bar charts

Pie charts

Line graphs

Others

Numeric presentation:

Percentages and percentiles

Measures of central tendency

Measures of dispersion

slide50
Analytic:

The researcher uses principles of biostatistics to test his hypothesis. Detection of proper statistical test depends on:

    • The objective of the study:
      • Descriptive
      • Looking for a difference
      • Looking for an association
    • Type of variable:
      • QT
      • QL
    • Distribution of the variable:
      • Normal
      • Binomial
      • Poisson
      • others
6 interpretation
6. Interpretation
  • Discussion of the results in a way that relates data obtained to each other clarifying the associations and other findings.