1 / 20

Dr. Aleš OLEJNÍČEK UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE Kounicova 65 Brno CZECH REPUBLIC

Qualitative and Quantitative Criterions of Performance Evaluation within Process of Military Professionals Training: Case of Defence University in Brno. Dr. Aleš OLEJNÍČEK UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE Kounicova 65 Brno CZECH REPUBLIC. CONTENT. INTRODUCTION

giulia
Download Presentation

Dr. Aleš OLEJNÍČEK UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE Kounicova 65 Brno CZECH REPUBLIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Qualitative and Quantitative Criterions of Performance Evaluation within Process of Military Professionals Training: Case of Defence University in Brno Dr. Aleš OLEJNÍČEK UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE Kounicova 65 Brno CZECH REPUBLIC

  2. CONTENT • INTRODUCTION • EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS • CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ORGANIZATION IN DEFENSE SECTOR • PERFOMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY EVALUATION IN THE UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE IN BRNO • CONCLUSION

  3. INTRODUCTION

  4. INTRODUCTION • The performance evaluation of public sector organizations is one of the great challenges to the theory and practice of public economics • The performance measurement in: • Private sector • measured by rate of rate of consumer successfulness, • expressed via business profit. • Public sector • benefit expression do not rest with consumer, • usefulness expressed by provider organization itself, • expression of mission, goals, functions and primarily organization performance is prerequisite of its rational operation. • The seekingand determination of qualitative and quantitative criterions of defense organization performance is highly required.

  5. EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS

  6. EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS • Inputs - tangible • Outputs - intangible • Evaluation of outputs and performance of the army units, military organizations or different parts of defense sector is possible by force of 3E methodology. • We are able gain the information about level of productivity by way of simultaneous comparison of these quantities(outputs x inputs). • Accurate expressed and measurable performance is crucial for resource allocation • For increasing productivity is necessary to determine unambiguous performance standards and qualitative aims.

  7. EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS

  8. EXPRESSION AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE UNDER DEFENSE CONDITIONS

  9. CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ORGANIZATION IN DEFENSE SECTOR

  10. CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS • The performance of organizations should be evaluated by quantitative and qualitative criterions that can be objectively planed and consequently checked on the basis of considered activity real results. • The most suitable indicator for process inputs evaluating is possible to consider the costs. • We can state the presumption from experiences that value (price) of the output could be assess on the same costs level like costs sum of each separate inputs. • Added value should be appear as the output quality that is possible to express by evaluated way, e.g. by way of parametrically established indicator.

  11. CONNECTION BETWEEN PERFORMANCE QUALITY AND QUANTITY AND EVALUATION OF EFFECTIVENESS

  12. performance quality and quantity evaluation in the university of defence in brno

  13. PROCEDURAL MODEL OF UNIVERSITY OF DEFENCE

  14. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE UNIVERSITY

  15. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE UNIVERSITY

  16. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE UNIVERSITY INDICATORS • Indicator of real value of evaluation pointVEP • VEP is calculated on the basis of total costs and total number of the evaluation points for study, pedagogical and scientific-research activity. • Indicator of Effectiveness IE • IE is indicator of departmental activities effectiveness” with huge explanatory power.We can create it with the assistance of reciprocal relationship to previous indicator VEP.

  17. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING WITHIN PROCEDURAL MODEL OF DEFENCE UNIVERSITY

  18. CONCLUSION

  19. CONCLUSION • Presented model of the evaluation performance of the economic effectiveness development can be used for planning purpose within determination of the planned process effectivenesswithin condition of armed forces or defence department as a whole. • Example of performance evaluation both quantitative side and qualitative side shows potentiality to overcame an impossibility or big difficulty of direct financial pricing of armed forces performance.

  20. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

More Related