80 likes | 230 Views
This examination explores the significance of attachment in childhood and its lasting impact on adult relationships. Drawing from Bowlby's attachment theory, which emphasizes the emotional bond between caregiver and child, we analyze how early attachments influence patterns of behavior and emotional responses in later interpersonal relationships. Studies by Ainsworth and Hazen & Shaver provide empirical support, revealing how secure and insecure attachments formed in infancy manifest in adult love and relational dynamics. Cultural factors and temperamental differences are also considered, highlighting the complexity of attachment's role in development.
E N D
Q3: Examine attachment in childhood and its role in the subsequent formation of relationships Read Pearson p. 194-199 and read the Study Guide Developmental Psychology
Suggested Approach • Introduction • Attachment (Bowlby, 1951)- the emotional bond between an individual and caregiver • Evolutionary explanation of attachment- an innate drive that manifests in behaviors that will illicit caring acts from the parent (smiling, crying) • Thesis: First attachments in infancy may have consequences in the formation of later relationships • Body • Attachment theory- Bowlby (1951) • Evidence- Ainsworth (1978) • Continuity in attachment patterns in adulthood- Hazen & Shaver (1987) • Other considerations- culture (mostly western studies) • Conclusion
Bowlby: Attachment Theory (1951) • John Bowlby • English psychoanalyst; influenced by WW2 • Attachment theory • Children form emotional attachments to a care-giver between 6 and 30 months • Manifestation of attachment-child seeks proximity to care-giver and use that person as a secure base • Emotional attachments contribute to later emotional and personality development • Events that interfere with attachment have short-term and long-term consequences • Attachment schemas guide early attachment and later relationships- the internal working model- model for expectations of behavior and care-giving from others • If the child receives love and affection, child will develop a schema that the ‘self’ is worthy of love and affection and will provide love to others in the future • If a child does not receive love and affection, child will develop a schema that the ‘self’ is unworthy of love and will repeat patterns of hostility
Ainsworth (1978)The Strange Situation • Mary Ainsworth- attempts at empirical support for Bowlby’s ideas • Aim- to observe attachment between caregiver and child • Procedure- 20 minute observation of child response to care-givers and strangers entering and leaving the room • Observation-exploration, child’s reaction to departure of care-giver, child anxiety when alone with the stranger, child’s behavior at re-union
Categories of Attachment • Securely Attached (type B-70%) • Securely attached-upset when mother leaves and happy to see her when she returns; mother involved • Insecure-Ambivalent (type C- 10%) • Child is upsetwhen mother leaves and not easily comforted when mother returns; seeks contact and also rejects it • Insecure-Avoidant (type A- 20%) • Child is indifferent when mother leaves the room and avoids contact when she returns; unafraid of strangers; insensitive mothers • Insecure-disorganized (type D- Main & Solomon, 1990) • -mixed reaction when the mother leaves or returns; associated with child abuse or maternal depression
Attachment & Relationships • Hazen & Shaver (1987)-adult attachment behavior reflects internal working model • ‘love quiz’ in a newspaper- self-selected, mean age of 36 • 56% secure- trusting, happy relationships • 25% avoidant- fear of intimacy, jealous • 19% ambivalent- obsession, jealous • Strengths- supported attachment styles, inner working model, generated more research, bridge • Limitations • Self-selected may not be representational • More females than males in the study • Self-report may not be reliable • Lack of space triangulation
Attachment in adulthood • Fraley & Shaver (2000)- secure infants become the most well-adjusted adults • Relationships have longevity, trust, commitment and interdependence; seek and provide support in times of distress • Segal & Jaffre (2007)- non-verbal skills learned in childhood are essential for adult relationships
Other considerations • Culture • Kroonenberg (1988)-secure attachment more common in the West, ambivalent more common in Japan; could be linked to child-rearing • Child temperament- Kagan (1982)- innate differences in temperament. Argued that temperament, not attachment, is measured in the strange situation