1 / 8

WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan

WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan. Region Skåne (PP7). 1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3. Objectives introduction to MSP mobilising players – “ warming up ” Increasing local/regional knowledge about MSP (incl Balt Sea Plan, Swedish status quo, EU)

gil-gallegos
Download Presentation

WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP 3 Pomeranian Bight Case Draft work plan Region Skåne (PP7)

  2. 1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3 Objectives • introduction to MSP • mobilising players – “warming up” • Increasing local/regional knowledge about MSP (incl Balt Sea Plan, Swedish status quo, EU) • increase stakeholders awareness of significance of MSP for them • Elaborate concepts for consultations

  3. 1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3 WS Design • Swedish language (except internat. speakers) • ~50 participants • Location: Malmö • Start with dinner day 1 • Presentations day 2 (morning) • WS day 2 (afternoon)

  4. 1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3 Presentations • The Swedish approach • The upcoming Swedish MSP legislation, EU COM proposal • Presentation of the BaltSeaPlan draft MSP • PomBight gaps - What do we actually know about the coastal/sea water of south Sweden? • Zoning and other principles in MSP • Local example of MSP (Lomma)

  5. 1st WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (18-)19/3 Workshop • What is in it (MSP) for you (your stakeholder group)? • Which are the conflicts in the Pom Bight (from a Swedish point of view)? Drawing the conflict map! • Zoning – how can it be used as a pedagogic tool in a multi-stakeholder-dialogue? • A successful MSP consultation from your point of view? • Established/lacking stakeholder groups relevant for the Pom Bight MSP?

  6. Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne) Succeeding workshops/meetings April – Oct 2013: Small dialogue meetings with Pom B stakeholders Objectives: • Methodological input for future processes: i.e. design of consultations, links to other processes • Identification of MLG focal issues for WS 2 • Higher level of awareness: ”What´s in it for us” & ”What is our role”? Priorities? • How do our sh-group want to partiSEApate?

  7. 2nd WS Pom B (WP3, PP7, Skåne), (30-31 Oct) WP3 - Objectivesof 2nd WS Main focus on testing the methodologicallessonslearnedduringprevious WS/meetings! Also: Local-regional-national consultation workshop • Howcanexistingstructures be used in MSP? • Urgent data gaps

  8. 3rd WS, Pom B (WP3, PP7), Szczecin, April 2014 Cross-sectorial transnational WS • Bringing together SE/PL/DE stakeholders to a transnational process. • Matching the previous outcomes against different planning cultures, legislations and planning administrations. • Identification of pros/contras of different zoning principles • Zoning – how can it be used in the cross-sectorial transnational-dialogue?

More Related