1 / 13

ASAS TN2 Roma, 04 /04/2006 Gate To Gate Project RTS3A

ASAS TN2 Roma, 04 /04/2006 Gate To Gate Project RTS3A. Vincenzo Melgiovanni ENAV S.p.A. Gate To Gate Pro ject. ATM project funded by the European Commission, proposes an integrated operational framework for implementation by 2010

germained
Download Presentation

ASAS TN2 Roma, 04 /04/2006 Gate To Gate Project RTS3A

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASAS TN2Roma, 04 /04/2006Gate To Gate ProjectRTS3A Vincenzo Melgiovanni ENAV S.p.A.

  2. Gate To Gate Project • ATM project funded by the European Commission, proposes an integrated operational framework for implementation by 2010 Objective: To define a European G2G operational concept and validate through FTS and RTS in terms of safety, capacity and efficiency Expected Benefits: • Enhanced capability to handle future traffic growth • Reduction of delays • Fuel saving and flexible flight operations 3 work packages based on: • DEPARTURE • EN-ROUTE • ARRIVAL

  3. Gate To Gate Task Distribution EN - ROUTE Climb EN-ROUTE & Multilayer Planning Descent FlowPlanning • INDRA • AENA , DFS DEPARTURE ARRIVAL • EUROCONTROL Flow Departure Management ExtendedTMA / TMA Management • ENAV, DSNA, NLR,SICTA, DB • LFV , NLR • THALES ATM • THALES ATM, AMS • EUROCONTROL • EUROCONTROL Consolidated Validation Simulation • EUROCONTROL Brétigny

  4. Gate To GateKey Operational Concept CLUSTER 1 CLUSTER 2 CLUSTER 3 Flow and Departure Management En – Route and Multilayer Planning E-TMA / TMA Management Arrival Management Improvement Dinamic Resectorisation Ground and Airborne Surveillance Applications Multi Sector Planner ATCO CWP and Working Methods Improvement Integrated Departure and Arrival Management ATC Automation ASPA - S&M ASAS Airborne Spacing Application Improved Flow and Capacity E-TMA / TMA Co-ordination

  5. GatetoGate WP3 Real Time Simulation 3A • RTS3A was held in ENAV Experimental center from 13th February to 3rd March 2006 • Dealing with: • AMAN and ASPA S&M supporting ATCOs in the process of arrival management in a realistic working environment (Rome E-TMA) • No functional interoperability between AMAN and ASPA applications • HMIintegration • Working Methods

  6. NE PAR LESAN FER LIMP TESTO MONEB BOA LUPOS KALIK LOS LUTOR GEN LAGEN TE NW TW LIMJ KARPI KALMO PELEG DORAV FOR BEROK CEV LUKIM RUXOL FRZ IXITO VALEN RIM IDONA SIPLO UNITA BAGNO AW PRT URBAN SPEZI KAFEE AE VAPIX PIS BUKIN GOSIS GINAR ANC KONER TORPO RESPU JESSY DENAL SPL BELEL KAREL UMBED TORTU LEONN NORNI AKUTI MAREL AMTEL PRU NUTRO MAURO TS NORKI KATAR GIRAG IXUSI SODRI TUNAL KARDU VERUN DOBIM XIBIL PREKI CAPCO MIRSA GITOD XOLTA MOULE GRO ELB BTA ELKAP BOL DOKAR RINAD POLYP PES GILIO TIBER BIBEK GILET PODOX ANEDA TAQ KISTO CMP MEDAL ROTIR GOLPO VELIM GUI MIKSO PEMAR GISPA VIE MAMAR RAVAL IDORI URB BEKOS KASTU AJO CIA OST PRA FRS AGASA ERIKA LUNAK TORLI LAT ELVIN VALMA SIPRO TEREZ POULP MOLUX MADKA CIRCE TEA ESINO TINTO AKAMO PITOR PEPIX RIFFI CORSI AMSOR EKTOL BATOX TALIN IVORY POZZO POM ROTUN DAGOR TOPNO GITRI BENTO PNZ SME MINKA ISKIA TURMO GALTI LUNAR SOR SUKUN KOLUS ENSOT VEGAN SALAS ROXAN VEGAS BAREN LOMAT SISMA TAGEL BEROL SODIO BEMBO POLIT DELER QUENN ANIBA VALLO VELEX LUKAN ARB RONAB MAREP RAMEN AGNIS CORAD EVINO KOVAS PAOLA ALEDI DORAS RINAM DEC LEDRO AMANO VENTO BELOK CAG SOMAS CAR SOBRI APVAR LAGER LUKAD ICORA GIANO LURON ROSAS VAKOR TADIX PIRIX VULKA CDC ADAMI DELIK SPUMA PIGER RONDI RTS3A Operational Scenario

  7. GatetoGate RTS3A Objectives High level Objectives: • OPERABILITY Workload, Usability • SAFETY • USER ACCEPTABILITY Job satisfaction, System trust/confidence ENAV Internal Objectives: - Benefits and Impactintroducing AMAN/ASAS in operative life - Opportunity for operational ATCO’s to practice AMAN/ASAS - The use of Independent Parallel Approaches in LIRF - AMAN/ASAS HMI integrated within the current ATM system

  8. GatetoGate RTS3A ASAS HMI ASAS Label 4 ASAS Advisorieswillbe displayed on the label • ASAS Symbol: Square Symbol on line 1, for ASAS Equipped a/c • Required Spacing/Actual Spacing: ASAS Spacing Required/Actual (in Time) on line 0 of the Designated a/c • ASAS Link: ASAS Link between the Tracks of designated and target when ASAS implemented • ORANGE for potential • BLUE for active • Target SSR Code: SSR Code on line 0 of selected Target label

  9. GatetoGate RTS3A ASAS HMI ASAS Label Highlighted Delegation Selecting one label ( Designated or Target), the ASAS chain will be highlighted Under Spacing ASAS Link and Required/Actual Spacing will get REDwhen the Actual Spacing is less than required spacing (at least 10 sec.)

  10. AMAN/ASAS Preliminary Findings 1/2 • Operability • Workload • ASPA S&M reduces EXCworkload in en-route and approach phases • EXC and PLC workload is more evenly distributed applying ASAS (slightly increased role for the PLC) • Usability • Applications should commence as early as possible to be more effective • Arrival flows approaching to the same RWY from different sectors require short ASPA S&M chains (max 3 A/C) • When Target is re-routed the designated has to be re-routed at the same way

  11. AMAN/ASAS Preliminary Findings 2/2 • Acceptability • ATCOs accepted and adapted quickly to ASPA S&M and AMAN • ASPA S&M complemented ATCOs compliance with AMAN advisories • Safety • ASPA S&M contributes to reduce separation losses • In unusual circumstances it is extremely difficult to comply with AMAN advisories orapply ASPA S&M applications • Situational Awareness is affected by ASPA S&M heading and merge/heading then remainbehind applications

  12. AMAN/ASAS Considerations • Working methods/phraseology must berefined • ASPA S&M needs adequate recovery procedures in case of failure modes • Target should be awareof its involvement in ASAS • Re-designed ATS geography can increase benefits using AMAN/ASAS • ATCOs should be providedwith suitable tools for assessment of delegation feasibility

  13. Thanks for your attention

More Related