1 / 34

The integration imperative

The integration imperative. Theory and practice. What is economic integration?. Types of integration – Tinbergen. Negative integration: Removal of discriminatory restrictions on movement across borders such as tariffs and quotas Positive integration:

georgettej
Download Presentation

The integration imperative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The integration imperative Theory and practice

  2. What is economic integration?

  3. Types of integration – Tinbergen • Negative integration: • Removal of discriminatory restrictions on movement across borders such as tariffs and quotas • Positive integration: • Modification of existing policies and institutions, often by common policies, to enable transnational markets to function more effectively

  4. Integration combines parts to make a whole • Economic integration based on removal of barriers that limit flow of goods, services, capital, labour and communication across borders • Integration is a process

  5. Stages of integration: free trade area • Not followed by EU • Tariff and quota free trade among member states • No positive integration • Persistence of non-tariff barriers between states • Retention of national tariffs against rest of the world • Problems of trade deflection (goods from third countries enter via member state with lowest tariff) overcome by rules of origin

  6. Stages of integration: customs union • EU built customs union by 1968 • No tariff quotas among member states • Common external tariff overcomes trade deflection problems • Some positive integration • Some common policies, especially regarding trade with third countries

  7. Stages of integration: common/single/internal market • Launched in mid-1980s in Europe with view to completion by 1992 – but an ongoing process • Customs union but enhanced by free movement of factors of production – goods, services, capital labour • More positive integration • Fuller development of common policies such as competition and regional policies

  8. Stages of integration: economic and monetary union • Partially achieved in Europe • Enhanced economic co-ordination and fiscal transfers • More intense positive integration • Removal of remaining obstacles to factor mobility • Limits on independence of member states • Single currency and monetary policy • More centralised supranational power, perhaps in a federal context

  9. Business opportunities and challenges from integration • Greater intensity of domestic competition • More opportunities in foreign markets • More diverse sourcing possible • Stimulus to product innovation • Restructuring of production and distribution • Cost and price pressure • Economies of scale • Specialisation • Greater price transparency • Rationalisation of product lines • Networking opportunities • Financing opportunities through integrated financial markets

  10. The origins, evolution and objectives of the European Union

  11. Concepts/ideas • Federalism • a form of government in which power is divided between central and regional authorities – e.g. US federal government and states; Germany and its länder • concerned with the process of achieving political union within a Federal structure

  12. Concepts/ideas • Functionalism The linking of authority to a specific activity – transport, competition regulation – thereby breaking the link between authority and national boundaries • Neo-functionalism Functional and political spillover

  13. Immediate post-1945: several Europes • Central and Eastern Europe – Soviet satellites until 1989–91 • Western Europe • EEC → EU (expanding) • EFTA (contracting) • The rest? CONVERGENCE?

  14. EEC → EU:a growing membership (1) • 1957: France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg • 1973: UK, Denmark, Irish Republic • 1981: Greece • 1986: Spain, Portugal • 1995: Finland, Austria and Sweden

  15. EEC → EU:a growing membership (2) • 2004: Cyprus, Estonia, Lithuania, Hungary, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Czech Republic • 2007: Bulgaria, Romania • 2013: Croatia • In the wings? Albania, Turkey, FYROM, Serbia, Montenegro • Iceland suspended negotiations

  16. Why did European co-operation flourish after 1945? • To prevent recurrence of previous mistakes • to open economies to trade and co-operation • protectionism of 1920s and 1930s regarded as root cause of instability → growth of pre-war Fascism • to include a defeated Germany in post-war reconstruction • reconciliation of France and Germany regarded as essential pre-requisite of peace in Western Europe • to avoid excesses of nationalism and the nation state system

  17. (continued) • Economicreconstruction • To rectify economic dislocation caused by wartime destruction • Political/security reasons • i.e. the emergence of two superpowers with competing political and economic ideologies • to provide a bulwark against Communism Conclusion: Western security and defence should be based on economic reconstruction and well-being European integration was motivated by economic, political and security reasons

  18. Measures to promote post-war integration • Intergovernmental organisations that did not challenge national sovereignty • 1948 Council of Europe • 1948 OEEC (now OECD) • Created to administer Marshall Aid (US financial assistance to aid economic reconstruction of post-war Europe) • 1948 NATO • Provided security framework within which economic integration could flourish

  19. European coal and steel community • 1951 – economic organisation with strong political undertones • France, Germany, Italy and BENELUX (customs union founded in 1948) • Franco-German reconciliation • National sovereignty sacrificed to achieve common goals: • common market for coal and steel • envisaged as step one of neo-functionalist spillover • Creation of supra-national institutions such as High Authority and Court of Justice

  20. Towards the European Economic Community (EEC) • 1955 Messina Conference • 1956 Spaak Report proposes • Common market • Nuclear energy community • 1957 Treaty of Rome (Signatories: France, Germany, Italy and BENELUX) 3 communities: • ECSC • European Economic Community (EEC) • European Atomic Energy Community (EURATOM)

  21. The UK position • Participated in Spaak Committee until 1955 BUT • Wanted a loose free trade area • Withdraws after the ‘6’ indicate they want closer ties • RESULT: European Free Trade Area (EFTA) created in 1960

  22. 1957 Treaty of Rome • A strong economic orientation, stressing economic integration based on economic liberalism (not the CAP) • Aims: • establish a common market – to stimulate internal free trade • ‘ever closer union’ • economic and social progress • constant improvement of living and working conditions • No agreement on political objectives

  23. First two decades • 1960s • Failed British applications • ‘Empty chair’ crisis and Luxembourg compromise • Customs union complete • Relaunch of integration • 1970s • First enlargement • Limited successes e.g. ERDF • Few signs of further integration • First attempt at single currency failed

  24. Early 1980s – Eurosclerosis • Integration paralysis – budget and CAP dominant issues • Concern about Europe’s competitiveness • Above plus international economic crisis → pressure for change • Single market campaign overcame integration paralysis • start of policy activism • 1985 Single Market White Paper • 1987 Single European Act – institutional reform

  25. The Single European market • 1985 White Paper with nearly 300 measures to establish the SEM • 1986 Portugal and Spain become new members • 1987 Single European Act – first Treaty reform • Institutional reform to facilitate passage of SEM measures • SEM • removed technical, physical and fiscal barriers to trade • EC policy into new areas – e.g. environment, R&D • Existing policies strengthened to support SEM – e.g. competition policy

  26. Controversy • Late 1980s – re-emergence of EMU idea • 1993 Maastricht Treaty • foreign and security and justice and home affairs pillars • institutional reform and subsidiarity • timetable and conditions for EMU • Union citizenship • extension of competences • opt-outs • Ratification problems

  27. Maastricht problems • Very ambitious – ahead of public opinion • Fears of loss of national sovereignty and identity and rise of European super-state • Complex, technocratic and incomprehensible • End of Cold War and CEE transformation • German unification • Timing – recession • Currency crises

  28. Post-Maastricht • Lower profile for integration but some successes • 1995 enlargement – Austria, Finland, Sweden • Increasing preparations for Eastern enlargement • May 1, 1999 – Amsterdam Treaty in force • 1999 – decision to proceed with EMU

  29. Amsterdam Treaty • Employment Chapter • Anti-discrimination • Schengen into Treaty • Social Chapter into Treaty • Some strengthening of European Parliament • Some disappointments on institutional reform

  30. Treaty of Nice – in force 2007 • Expressly to prepare for enlargement • Number of Commissioners • Weighting of votes in Council • National veto • Charter of Fundamental Rights • ‘Flexible integration’ – at least 8 countries able to co-operate more closely • Ratification delayed by ‘no’ in Irish referendum – overturned in 2nd vote

  31. Post-Nice • Dissatisfaction with limited achievements of Amsterdam and Nice → convention on the Future of Europe and eventually to the Draft Constitutional Treaty • Fierce opposition – fears of ‘European Super State’ • 2005: Constitution fell after ‘no’ votes in French and Dutch referenda • Back to the drawing board

  32. Lisbon Treaty – in force 2009 • Retained many features of constitution but not referred to as constitution • Less fierce opposition and, despite Irish ‘no’ (overturned in 2nd referendum), ratification relatively trouble-free

  33. Main features of Lisbon Treaty • Clarifies exclusive competences of EU; competences shared with member states and supporting competences • Charter of Fundamental Rights given legal force • EU citizens given rights to petition the Commission • Extension of EP powers and national parliaments given formal powers to challenge EU legislative proposals • Member states given rights to negotiate exit from EU • New voting procedures in the Council • Posts of President of the Council and the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy created

  34. Challenges for the EU? • The survival of EMU – response to crises? • More enlargement – especially Turkish challenge • International challenges and obligations – economic and political • Popular support declining – evidence for this in many EU member states • Diverging visions of Europe

More Related