Chemistry 114 Lecture Notes. Jim Gimzewski. BASIC ERRORS IN MEASUREMENTS. Every measurement that is made is subject to a number of errors. If you cannot measure it, you cannot know it. A. Einstein. All scientific measures are subject to error.
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Every measurement that is made is subject to a number of errors.
If you cannot measure it, you cannot know it.
These errors are reflected in the number of figures reported for the measurement.
These errors are also reflected in the observation that two successive measures of the same quantity are different.
The word error in science has a different significance than in general human experience
Every measurement that is made is subject to a number of errors. The following is a list
of possible sources of error:
1.1. Static Error
Static error is an error that does not vary with time and is inherent in most instruments. A typical
static error is the zero setting of the needle in an analog display. Some Multimeters are designed to be used laying flat on its back. If a measurement is made with these instrument standing up, then a static error inherent in the design of the instrument is introduced.
1.2. Dynamic Error
A dynamic error can occur when the quantity being measured fluctuates as a function of time. An instrument may not give the correct reading if it is used to measure a voltage that varies slowly with time. Not all instruments can be used to measure periodic waveforms at higher frequencies.
An important rule in making any measurement is that the measuring process must not
significantly upset and alter the phenomena being measured. In practice, the measuring process will have some effect on the measurement being made, and this is something that should be considered as a source of error. Such errors may be caused by “inserting” an ammeter with a non-zero impedance in a circuit, or placing a voltmeter across a circuit that “loads” down the voltage being measured.
Any measuring instrument will be accurate only to a certain extent and only if it has been
1.5. Human Error
A human error is an error made by an observer when recording a measurement or by using an instrument incorrectly. Two types of human error are parallax reading error (caused by reading an instrument pointer from an angle) and interpolation error (made in “guessing” the correct value between two calibrated marks on the meter scale).
Theoretical models are often used to determine the range of measurement that can be expected when measurements of phenomena are made. The actual phenomena, however, may be complex and the model used may be valid over a small limited range of values. This can result in a discrepancy between theoretical and measured results that is not caused by any experimental error, but by the inadequacy of the theoretical model to describe the phenomena being measured.
1.7. Miscellaneous Error
A miscellaneous error is an error that does not fit in the above categories. An example of such an error is an error caused by taking measurements under different temperature conditions.
The number of digits reported in a measurement reflect the accuracy of the measurement and the precision of the measuring device.
In any calculation, the results are reported to the fewest significant figures (for multiplication and division) or fewest decimal places (addition and subtraction).
Non-zero numbers are always significant.
Zeros between non-zero numbers are always significant.
Zeros before the first non-zero digit are not significant. (Example: 0.0003 has one significant figure.)
Zeros at the end of the number after a decimal place are significant.
Zeros at the end of a number before a decimal place are ambiguous (e.g. 10,300 g).
The terms determinate error and systematic error are synonyms. "Systematic" means that when the measurement of a quantity is repeated several times, the error has the same size and algebraic sign for every measurement. "Determinate" means that the size and sign of the errors are determinable (if the determinate error is recognized and identified).
A common cause of determinate error is instrumental or procedural bias. For example: a miscalibrated scale or instrument, a color-blind observer matching colors.
Another cause is an outright experimental blunder.
Examples: using an incorrect value of a constant in the equations, using the wrong units, reading a scale incorrectly. Every effort should be made to minimize the possibility of these errors, by careful calibration of the apparatus and by use of the best possible measurement techniques.
Determinate errors can be more serious than indeterminate errors for three reasons. (1) There is no sure method for discovering and identifying them just by looking at the experimental data. (2) Their effects can not be reduced by averaging repeated measurements. (3) A determinate error has the same size and sign for each measurement in a set of repeated measurements, so there is no opportunity for positive and negative errors to offset each other
1. Indeterminate Errors.
Indeterminate errors are present in all experimental measurements. The name "indeterminate" indicates that there's no way to determine the size or sign of the error in any individual measurement. Indeterminate errors cause a measuring process to give different values when that measurement is repeated many times (assuming all other conditions are held constant to the best of the experimenter's ability). Indeterminate errors can have many causes, including operator errors or biases, fluctuating experimental conditions, varying environmental conditions and inherent variability of measuring instruments.
The effect that indeterminate errors have on results can be somewhat reduced by taking repeated measurements then calculating their average. The average is generally considered to be a "better" representation of the "true value" than any single measurement, because errors of positive and negative sign tend to compensate each other in the averaging process.
length in inches =
(length in m)(conversion factor for mcm)(conversion factor for cminches).
2.54 cm / inch, 100cm = 1 m
In dimensional analysis always ask three questions:
What data are we given?
What quantity do we need?
What conversion factors are available to take us from what we are given to what we need?
M L T K (theta)
a) energy joule (J) kg·m2/s2
b) force newton (N) kg·m/s2
c) frequency hertz (Hz) (cycles)·s-1
d) power watt (W) J/s = kg·m2/s3 calculate energy of 77.9 g object
e) charge coulomb (C) A·s traveling at velocity of 120 m/s
E= ½ mv2 M. L2. T-2 units kg. m.2 s-2 SI units….
Estimates of orders of magnitude…
100g . 100 m/s = 0.1 kg. ( 10e2) 2 m2.s-2 = 10e3 J
If you were an ADC with 12-bit resolution you can resolve a signal into 2 12 or 4096 possible amplitude values, which is adequate for most biological signals; an ADC with 16-bit resolution can resolve a
signal into 2 16 or 65,536 possible amplitude values.
For a 12 bit digitization the values in a 10 V range, say, would be divided into 4000 fixed values from –10 V to +10 V; the minimum change in voltage that could be discerned at that range would be 5 mV. At 10 mV range, the minimum discernible voltage change would be 5 mV.
ADC resolution is part of the hardware, and cannot be set by the user. But the input range can often be.
Was enough data taken
Determinate (systemic or technical)
Significant Figures: experimental uncertainties should be rounded to one significant digit
The last in any stated answer should usually be of the same order of magnitude (in the decimal position) as the uncertainty.
m = H.x ?????
m = H.x2
CONSTANTS IN EQUATIONS: q = B.x
POWER q = xn