1 / 4

Long-Term Outcomes of DES vs. BMS for Saphenous Vein Graft Occlusions

This study compares the efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in treating saphenous vein graft occlusions over a 35-month follow-up period. The results show DES to be more favorable in reducing adverse events like death, MI, TLR, TVR, and TVF.

gaye
Download Presentation

Long-Term Outcomes of DES vs. BMS for Saphenous Vein Graft Occlusions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PES versus BMS for SV grafts: SOS 35 months Objective: to report the longtermoutcomesafter DES compared to BMS for treatmentof saphenousveingraft occlusionsStudy: single-blindmulticenterrandomizedstudyPopulation: patients treated for saphenousveingraft occlusionsEndpoint: death, MI, TLR, TVR and TVF

  2. PES versus BMS for SV grafts: SOS 35 months

  3. PES versus BMS for SV grafts: SOS 35 months

  4. PES versus BMS for SV grafts: SOS 35 months Conclusion PES wasassociatedwith more favourable 35 monthfollow-up outcomes for treatment of SVG occlusions than BMS Brilakis JACC Intv 2011;4:175-82

More Related