260 likes | 429 Views
Study questions. How are African communities affected by HIV and AIDS actually responding through the adoption, adaptation, innovation of technologies to enhance their livelihood security? How do development policies of governmental and non-governmental actors facilitate and/or hinder community-bas
E N D
1. Crops, Cellphones and T-Cells: Technology Change for Livelihood Security in Sub Saharan Africa
2. Study questions How are African communities affected by HIV and AIDS actually responding through the adoption, adaptation, innovation of technologies to enhance their livelihood security?
How do development policies of governmental and non-governmental actors facilitate and/or hinder community-based technology innovation for livelihood security?
Funded by the John D and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
3. Technology change ?? HIV/AIDS
4. Livelihoods and AIDS mitigation Infection, chronic illness, death = loss of
Labor, knowledge
Remittances, wages
Assets
7. Mixed methods Mapping, Timelines, Participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussion, key informant interviews
Agency reports, email, field reports of technology changes
Secondary data on farm production, wage work, sugar industry, HlV/AIDS surveillance, IEC, VCT, HBC, ART programs
8. Findings from field research
Western Province, Kenya
High prevalence, generalized epidemic
Lake Victoria, fishing, TZ/UG borders, truck routes, sugar industry, history of mobility, wage work
12. Policy implication (1) Tsetse fly & trypanosomiasis control will help mitigate AIDS
Conservation policies (Ruma National Park) conflict with human and livestock health
Traps removed, bush cover (habitat) remains
14. Kakichumma Village Population 2005 ~ 350 households, ~2800
HIV/AIDS
Arrived in 1991, widespread
about 30% directly affected, others indirectly
Poverty: thatch roofs, no hoe, no blankets
Remote: no bus, phone, electricity, extension services, official visits
One NGO (ACE) active, some HBC training
Health center: 5 miles away (foot); hospital (ART) in Bungoma town
16. Changes in Gardens w/ HIV / AIDS concerns Plants
Diversity of herbs, shrubs, grasses, trees, tubers, legumes
knowledge intensive (traditional and modern)
Techniques
Pile vs. pit composting, intercropping, terracing
Conservation agriculture
Permaculture, organic
17. Use Hand Tools
Hoes (jembes)
Machete/pangas
maybe shovels, pickaxe, occasional ox-plow
Storage, Processing, Cooking
Non-chemical preservation
Nutritional Supplements ? IGA
Seed bulking & banks
18. New “adopters” and innovators
chronically ill, HIV +, orphans and vulnerable children, caregivers
New uses
social support, nutrition
social structures & norms
community organization for land, labor, distribution
School clubs
19. Hybrid Systems responding to HIV & AIDS New combinations
Neglected indigenous leafy vegetables and new “ProvitA” enriched sweet potato
For staple food, micronutrients, income-generation
range of HIV & AIDS-affected
20. Constraints to rural garden technology change (the right) Seeds and Planting Material in short supply
Water: In the wrong place, wrong time
Tools: inadequate, worn, lacking
Technical information scarce
Labor & time
21. “Appropriate technology” to combat HIV and AIDS is wide-ranging
Not only “labor-saving” –often capital intensive (animal traction)
more intelligent use of labor, more productive, multi-purpose outputs
hoes + cellphones, drip irrigation + HAART
Drudgery reduction, home based care
23. Diffusion & Adaptation Social Networks
NGOS like ACE ? trainees, friends, opinion leaders, neighbors
Mobility & Remittances ? cash, ideas infusion
Constant adaptation, rejection, recombination
Constant recovery of old, and infusion of new
Rural innovations abound
Development, globalization, HIV/AIDS all bring challenges and opportunities
Information, better nutrition, Anti-retroviral therapy
Polarization and intensification of poverty
material goods, labor, cash, land, hope
24. further conclusions HIV/AIDS in generalized rural epidemic: everyone is affected
through networks and interconnections
Cumulative burden over time, prevention not enough
Eager to talk and learn
Household-level “AIDS affected” measures used in studies are inadequate
“chronically ill” , “presence of orphans”
Cumulative effects, missing, dissolved
need to view community as a whole over time
25. Policy implication (2)
26. Acknowledgements Action in the Community environment (ACE Africa), Bungoma
Animal Draft Power Programme (ADPP), Homa Bay
Residents of Nyapuodi Village
Residents of Kakichumma Village
Paul Harvey, co-investigator, ODI
27. Resources: HIV/AIDS, food and livelihoods International Food Policy Research Institute
www.ifpri.org
FANTAproject.org (nutrition)
Food and Agriculture Organization
www.fao.org/hivaids