1 / 5

FIGHT! FIGHT!

FIGHT! FIGHT!.

gamba
Download Presentation

FIGHT! FIGHT!

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FIGHT! FIGHT!

  2. IMAGINE THAT YOU ARE THE PRINCIPLE OF CVCHS AND YOU JUST FOUND OUT THAT THERE WAS A FIGHT IN THE QUAD DURING LUNCH. YOU’VE ASKED MANY STUDENTS AND TEACHERS WHO WITNESSED THE FIGHT TO WRITE DOWN WHAT THEY SAW AND WHO THEY THINK STARTED THE FIGHT. UNFORTUNATELY YOU HAVE RECEIVED MANY CONFLICTING ACCOUNTS THAT DISAGREE ABOUT IMPORTANT DETAILS OF THE FIGHT, LIKE WHO STARTED IT, WHEN IT STARTED, AND WHO WAS INVOLVED. IT IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT NO ONE IS LYING.

  3. DISCUSS WITH A PARTNER and write in your notebook: • Why are there different stories of the event if no one is lying. • Who are the different people that may have seen the fight? • What might make a person’s story more believable than another person’s? Why?

  4. Discuss: • Why might people see or remember things differently? • Who has an interest in one person getting in trouble versus another? Who was there? Could they see the whole thing? • The plausibility of the stories themselves (e.g. issues of exaggeration and how stories fit into what is known about the student’ prior histories). Is the story believable? Trustworthy? • Time: Do the stories change over time? Will what we remember about the event change over time? Does time affect the trustworthiness of the story? • Physical Evidence: What might physical evidence affect who/what you believe (bruises/missing objects, etc)?

  5. Consider: • The principal needs to consider which stories are more or less reliable because it is important to understand why the fight began. Not only is it important that the instigator (if there was one) be punished, but also it’s important to think about how to prevent such fights in the future. • Historians, in trying to figure out what happened in the past, do the same thing. You can’t recreate the moment or time-travel to witness it. You can only work with evidence that is left: artifacts, people, recorded events. • SOURCING is when we question a piece of evidence to determine if it is trustworthy. You ask about people’s points of view and biases, and consider how that shapes their story. We all the world in a different way but that does not mean that the story is not true or valuable!

More Related