1 / 33

Bucket Eradication Status & Action Plans

Bucket Eradication Status & Action Plans Presentation to Select Committee on Land & Environmental Affairs Dated the 23 rd of February 2007. Presented by: MEC Mafereka. Definition of a Bucket System to be Eradicated.

Download Presentation

Bucket Eradication Status & Action Plans

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bucket Eradication Status & Action Plans Presentation to Select Committee on Land & Environmental Affairs Dated the 23rd of February 2007 Presented by: MEC Mafereka

  2. Definition of a Bucket System to be Eradicated Elimination of a historic plastic or any other form of bucket system in formalized areas and replacing it with a suitable approved alternative.

  3. Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the Free State • Total buckets 2004  160 000 • Current Backlog Jan 2007  88 791 • Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007  71 209 • Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006  R799.1 million • Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket  R1 113 billion • Funding available currently  R 679.9 m • Shortfall  R 566.1m

  4. Current Status on Eradication of Buckets in the Free State

  5. Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State • The Free State has challenges of Water Resources in the following Municipal areas: • Dihlabeng • Sterkfontein-Qwaqwa • Nketoane • Ngwathe • Jagersfontien-Fauresmith • Rouxville-Smithfield • Tokologo • As a result, it becomes extremely difficult to eradicate buckets with waterborne sanitation.

  6. Delivery Hot Spot Areas in the Free State (Cont …) • Most municipalities have capacity problems with their sewer treatment plants, they will require upgrading and the province has a short fall of R500 million. • Few existing sewer treatment plants have spare capacity. • Some municipalities are currently not eradicating buckets until they have DoRA allocations in the new financial year (see slide on current status on eradication)

  7. Potential Problem Areas in WSAs • Most municipalities experience shortage of technical skills, the department of LG&H together with DWAF have made available engineers to assist with technical supervision at the WSAs. • A water supply master plan has been developed and it should be implemented as soon as funding is available • A decision making tool to guide municipalities for the choice of sanitation of technology, referred to as the sanitation strategy document, has been developed & municipalities to adhere to it.

  8. Potential Problem Areas in WSAs (Cont…) • Enforce implementation role-out plan as presented, through continuous monitoring • Review unit cost to meet current average in FS • Obtain additional R 566 million to enable the eradication of 45 000 units not yet funded • Ensure that detail action plans, focused on sustainability are being implemented

  9. Expenditure Performance To Jan 2007

  10. Budget Constraints • Current Backlog Jan 2007  88 791 • Buckets eradicated to date Jan 2007  71 209 • Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ R9000/bucket as per Policy 2006  R799.1 million • Funding required to eradicate current backlog @ an average unit cost in the FS @ R12 534/bucket  R1 113 billion • Funding available currently  R 679.9 m • Shortfall  R 566.1m

  11. Provincial Delivery Constraints • Shortage of funding to eliminate all buckets by October 2007 • Ceiling cost per bucket currently of R9000 is not adequate vs. the current average cost of R12 534 • Poor attendance by municipal key staff and politicians in most meetings • No proper roll out plans were available at municipalities during the bucket eradication workshops • Shortage of water in certain municipalities • Insufficient capacity on the existing bulk infrastructure • Some LMs are extending their Programmes to 2008/09

  12. Implementation Plan Mantsopa

  13. Implementation Plan Mohakare

  14. Implementation Plan Naledi

  15. Implementation Plan Letsemeng

  16. Implementation Plan Kopanong

  17. Implementation Plan Mangaung

  18. Implementation Plan Nala

  19. Implementation Plan Masilonyana

  20. Implementation Plan Tokologo

  21. Implementation Plan Tswelopele

  22. Implementation Plan Matjhabeng

  23. Implementation Plan Metsimaholo

  24. Implementation Plan Ngwathe

  25. Implementation Plan Mafube

  26. Implementation Plan Moqhaka

  27. Implementation Plan Phumelela

  28. Implementation Plan Maluti

  29. Implementation Plan Nketoana

  30. Implementation Plan Setsoto

  31. Implementation Plan Dihlabeng

  32. Detail funding per LM

  33. Establish Capacity Constraints • Most rural municipalities are not able to attract the right caliber of skill/expertise they require • No sufficient monitoring of water services delivery at municipal level • Low expenditure of project implementation • Lack of capacity in engaging communities in service delivery issues • Lack of capacity at municipal level to facilitate revenue collection and credit control • Lack of technical expertise mostly in Water & sewer treatment plants, hence water quality problems

More Related