1 / 6

Simplifying IANA Registration for Experimental X-Enumservices

This draft by Bernie Hoeneisen addresses the need for a clearer registration process for experimental and trial ENUM services under the new X-Enumservices category. Currently, many of these services don't meet the criteria for standard registration due to undefined URIs. The proposal suggests creating an additional IANA registry specifically for X-Enumservices to facilitate low-barrier registrations. This approach aims to ensure clarity for ENUM implementors, promote the publication of experimental services, and gather valuable community feedback while aligning with existing ENUM service guidelines.

gali
Download Presentation

Simplifying IANA Registration for Experimental X-Enumservices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IANA Registration of Experimental and Trial Enumservices(X-Enumservices)‏ Bernie Hoeneisen draft-ietf-enum-x-service-regs-01

  2. Problem Statement • RFC 3761 and bis contain text about X- Enumservices • There is demand for trial and experimental Enumservices • Most of those services do not qualify even for the new registration process • E.g. if URI Scheme has not been defined yet • Why a registry? • Clash prevention • Information for ENUM implementors • Way to publish “X-” Enumservice work and gather feedback

  3. Goals • Provide a simpler mechanism to register Enumservices for purpose of: • Trial • Experimental • Separate productive and experimental in terms of requirements for IANA registrations

  4. Approach • Create (additional) IANA Registryfor X- Enumservices • Keeping barriers for registration low • Should those even be lower? • Re-use ordinary registration process (enumservice-guide) descriptions where applicable • Skip those parts not needed for 'X-'

  5. Progress • Was hold up until IETF-71 (Philadelphia)‏ • Reason: Major changes in enumservice-guide • Revision -01 published two months ago • Complete rewrite • Back in line with enumservice-guide • No feedback to revision -01 on the list • Personal feedback received during IETF-72 • Barriers for registration still to be lowered

  6. Issues / Feedback / Questions ?

More Related