1 / 7

Internationalization of the Curriculum

Internationalization of the Curriculum. Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council (AGC) December, 2010. Aleta Anderson, Department Head, Language & Thought Ric Underhile, Associate Dean, Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies. Internationalization of the Curriculum.

gail-mullen
Download Presentation

Internationalization of the Curriculum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internationalization of the Curriculum Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council (AGC) December, 2010 Aleta Anderson, Department Head, Language & Thought Ric Underhile, Associate Dean, Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies

  2. Internationalization of the Curriculum Grand Rapids Community College Academic Governing Council (AGC) February, 2013 Ric Underhile, Associate Dean, Instructional Support & Interdisciplinary Studies

  3. The Committee • Anna Maria Clark • Brent Spitler • Keith St. Clair • Kellie Roblin • Kimberly Overdevest • Kimberly Wyngarden • Matt Douglas • Michael Gillan • Mike Light • Nan Schichtel • Nancy Forrest • Robert Hendershot • Sherry Knoppers • Katherine Geeseman • Mike DeVivo • GordanVurusic • SzymonMachewski • Aleta Anderson • Ric Underhile

  4. Intention • Clearly define “internationalization” • Active consideration of GRCC’s existing capacity and desired scope for internationalizing the curriculum (i.e., “What can we do and what should we do?”) • Review the concept of curriculum • Align existing resources so that they culminate in a logical internationalization/cultural studies curriculum • Link Study Away with Internationalization

  5. How could students benefit? • Promote empathy for other cultures and values systems • Increase awareness of prevailing world conditions and global trends, human values & choices • Support students in their development of a sense of self and community within the city, state, and region; • Provide opportunities for learning, cultural development and career education;* • Foster understanding and building global partnerships;* • Prepare students to take their place in an increasingly global community and world citizenship.*

  6. What we sought to accomplish • Transition “internationalization of the curriculum” to “cultural competency”or “globalization.” • Support Study Abroad becoming Study Away to more accurately reflect the range of opportunities for students to engage in cultural aspects of the local, regional, national and international world • Authorize a capacity analysis for the development of a cultural competencies department or center, including a foreign student exchange program • Further consider trategies for designating student achievement of cultural studies/globalization/internationalization learning outcomes (e.g., diploma or transcript designation)

  7. Status & Recommendation • Academic Program Review: Recreation of the process, including a consultation from an external expert and new position. • Study Away: Recreation of the process, including a consultation from an external consultant and subsequent reassignment of the work in a pilot program. Recommendations • Recognize that these elements are now embedded into existing work. • Retire the Committee.

More Related