Veni vidi induxi
1 / 26

Veni, Vidi, Induxi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Ladyman Chapter 1-2. UC 2002 Fall. Veni, Vidi, Induxi. Louis, Jessica, Sandra, Floris. Sci101 History & Philosophy of Science. Order of Appearance. Sandra ( Background Information ) Jessica & Louis ( Discussion ) Floris ( Gruesome Theories ) Louis & Jessica ( Discussion ).

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Veni, Vidi, Induxi' - gad

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Veni vidi induxi

Ladyman Chapter 1-2

UC 2002 Fall

Veni, Vidi, Induxi

Louis, Jessica, Sandra, Floris

Sci101 History & Philosophy of Science

Order of appearance
Order of Appearance

  • Sandra (Background Information)

  • Jessica & Louis (Discussion)

  • Floris (Gruesome Theories)

  • Louis & Jessica (Discussion)

Scientific revolution
Scientific revolution

  • Aristotle

    • deduction

  • Bacon

    • induction


All M are P

S is M

S is P


M1, M2, M3, Mn are P

All M are P

Veni vidi induxi

  • Addressed problems of induction

  • Cause and effect



Jessica & Louis

Hume says
Hume says:

In each case, the moral is that a priori reasoning and argument gets us nowhere: "it is only experience which teaches us the nature and bounds of cause and effect, and enables us to infer the existence of one object from that of another.”

Gruesome theories

Gruesome Theories

The role of theories in inductive science.


Topic outline
Topic Outline

  • What are scientific theories?

    • Characteristics, Inner Mechanics

  • What can go wrong?

    • The role of theories in inductive reasoning.

    • The ‘Grue’-paradox


  • Once again; brainstorm about


Theory characteristics i
Theory Characteristics I

  • A theory tries to explain why certain events take place.

  • Example:

“I (Ptolemy) designed my theory about the solar system to explain the observed movement of the planets and stars.”

Theory characteristics ii
Theory Characteristics II

  • How do they go about explaining?

  • Compare:

    • ‘This here is a chair.’ (hardly a theory)

    • ‘There is a force on this chair.’

  • Can we directly see a force?

    • Only its results.

  • Scientific Theories postulate things that cannot be directly perceived.


  • Likewise, a generalised

    rule cannot be perceived.

  • Causal relation:

    • ‘If I drop this chair out of the window, it will fall to the ground.’

    • We cannot directly ‘see’ this rule in nature; it rather is a pronunciation of our notion of regularity in accumulated perceptions of objects falling when dropped.


  • Since we cannot directly perceive what a theory postulates, therefore, in order to verify the theory, we can only look at the perceivable predictions it makes.


Generalised Rules










Theory (nice story)




Unperceivable Concepts


test X5


  • This thing falls, that thing falls to the ground.

  • This thing falls at a different speed.


  • Everything that is released falls to the ground.

  • In that case, things on the moon will fall at a different speed.

Generalised Rule

  • Things fall because there is a gravitational force being applied to it (depending on size of attracting body).


Problem about scientific theories
Problem about Scientific Theories

  • But if the predictions are correct, then the theory does not have to be right (consider the fairy tale).

  • Therefore, there are two kinds of problems:

    • We cannot verify all possible cases a theory covers. (Presented by Ladyman) (philosophy of science)

    • We cannot verify the theory in itself. (metaphysics)

Illustration problem
Illustration Problem

  • Being ‘grue’ means being green before 2005 and blue after 2005.

  • Now we have a theory that says that all emeralds are ‘grue.’

  • Every emerald we see seems to add up to the conclusion that this theory is correct.

Ockham s razor
Ockham’s Razor

  • William of Ockham’s Razor:

    ‘If all things are equal, the most simple explanation is the right one.’

  • By the way, he was a Medieval Philosopher.


  • Scientific theories are designed to explain.

  • Scientific theories tend to postulate concepts that cannot be directly perceived.

  • Problems about induction:

    • We cannot verify all possible cases a theory covers. (presented by Ladyman)

    • We cannot verify the theory in itself.



Louis & Jessica

Science is the religion of modern societies1
Science is the religion of modern societies

Definition of religion(the concise Oxford dictionary):

  • The belief in a superhuman controlling power, esp. in a personal God or gods entitled to obedience and worship

  • A particular system of faith and worship

  • A thing that one is devoted to

  • Et cetera

Science is the religion of modern societies2
Science is the religion of modern societies

Since scientific theory in itself cannot be observed, therefore it could be just a likely explanation. It takes a leap of faith to believe that the theory is actually true.

The end
The End

  • Have a nice break.

  • A copy of this presentation is available for downloading at